International Journal of Pedagogics
52
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue06 2025
PAGE NO.
52-55
10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue06-15
Developing the Didactic Competence of Future History Teachers
Through Innovative Methods
Xujanova Lobar Raimkulovna
Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan
Received:
12 April 2025;
Accepted:
08 May 2025;
Published:
10 June 2025
Abstract:
The rapid diffusion of digital technologies, constructivist learning paradigms, and competency-based
standards has transformed expectations of teacher preparation programmes worldwide. Within this evolving
landscape, the didactic competence of future history educators
—
understood as the integrated capacity to design,
implement, and critically reflect on learning experiences that cultivate historical thinking
—
emerges as a pivotal
quality benchmark. This article explores how innovative instructional methods, including project-based inquiry,
flipped classroom design, and immersive digital simulations, shape the formation of didactic competence among
pre-service history teachers at Gulistan State University. Employing a convergent mixed-methods design, the
study triangulates quantitative gains in competency self-assessment scores with qualitative insights drawn from
lesson‐plan analyses and reflective journals produced during a semester
-long intervention. Results indicate that
systematic exposure to innovation-centred pedagogy significantly elevates pre-
service teachers’ mastery of
content contextualisation, formative assessment strategies, and student-centred orchestration techniques.
However, uneven digital literacy and restricted access to classroom technologies moderate these outcomes,
underscoring the necessity of targeted infrastructure investment and sustained mentorship. The article concludes
that an integrated approach aligning methodological innovation with reflective practice and institutional support
offers a viable pathway for developing robust didactic competence in future history teachers.
Keywords:
Didactic competence; teacher education; history pedagogy; innovative methods; mixed-methods
research; Gulistan State University.
Introduction:
Teacher education, long critiqued for an
overreliance on transmissive lecture formats, confronts
mounting pressure to cultivate professionals capable of
navigating classrooms characterised by pluralistic
epistemologies, digital saturation, and rapidly shifting
curricular mandates. In the specific domain of history
education, this imperative becomes particularly acute;
the discipline demands not only factual accuracy but
also interpretive sophistication, ethical discernment,
and sensitivity to competing narratives. Didactic
competence
—
the composite of pedagogical content
knowledge, methodological versatility, assessment
literacy, and reflective disposition
—
functions as the
connective tissue binding these expectations into
coherent instructional practice.
Traditional practicum models, while useful for
socialising novices into school cultures, rarely
guarantee systematic development of innovative
teaching repertoires. Pre-service history teachers often
emulate the expository routines they experienced as
pupils, reproducing a textbook-centric classroom
ecology antithetical to the inquiry-driven, dialogic
ethos now foregrounded in national standards such as
the “Uzbek Model of Modern Education” and
international
frameworks
like
the
UNESCO
Competency-Based Approach. A growing div of
comparative research spanning Finland, Singapore, and
Estonia suggests that structured exposure to
innovation-embracing methodologies
—
project-based
learning, game-based micro-simulations, augmented
reality field trips
—
not only enhances student
engagement but also strengthens teachers’ curricular
agility and reflective metacognition.
Yet the contextual applicability of these findings to
Central Asian teacher education programmes remains
underexplored. Gulistan State University, situated in
International Journal of Pedagogics
53
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)
Uzbekistan’s Syrdarya region, presents an illustrative
case. The Faculty of History and Social Sciences
enrolled its first cohort of Bachelor of Education
students in 2020 under a revised competency-based
curriculum. In 2023 the faculty piloted an Innovation-
Centred Didactics (ICD) module aimed at embedding
progressive pedagogical approaches within the existing
practicum structure. This article reports on an empirical
evaluation of that module, addressing two research
questions: (1) To what extent does participation in the
ICD module advance pre-
service history teachers’
didactic competence? (2) What contextual factors
facilitate or constrain the integration of innovative
methods into lesson design and delivery?
By situating its inquiry at the intersection of
methodological
innovation
and
competency
development, the study contributes empirical nuance
to a growing yet geographically uneven literature.
Moreover, it offers actionable insights for regional
teacher education stakeholders grappling with the twin
challenges of resource limitations and aspirational
curricular reforms.
The investigation adopted a convergent mixed-
methods design wherein quantitative and qualitative
data were collected simultaneously, analysed
separately, and merged for interpretive synthesis. The
participant pool comprised thirty-four third-year
Bachelor of Education (History) students, stratified into
an experimental group (n = 18) that completed the ICD
module and a comparison group (n = 16) that followed
the conventional practicum. Assignment to groups
reflected
enrolment
logistics
rather
than
randomisation, warranting cautious generalisation.
The ICD module spanned sixteen weeks and featured
sequential workshops on project-based inquiry, flipped
classroom planning, formative assessment analytics,
and immersive digital storytelling. Each workshop
combined demonstration sessions, micro-teaching
rehearsals, and collaborative reflection aimed at
explicit competence articulation. University digital
laboratories equipped with internet-enabled laptops,
interactive whiteboards, and open-source software
supported hands-on practice, although some sessions
relied on simulation due to equipment scarcity.
Quantitative measurement employed the Didactic
Competence Inventory for History Teachers (DCI-H),
adapted and content-validated for the Uzbek context
through back-translation and expert panel review. The
inventory comprises twenty-six Likert-type items
across four sub-scales: content contextualisation,
methodological design, assessment literacy, and
reflective capacity. Pre-test administration occurred in
week one; post-test followed in week sixteen.
Cronbach’s alpha for the overall scale reached 0.91,
attesting to internal consistency. Paired t‐tests within
groups and independent-sample t-tests across groups
assessed statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Qualitative data consisted of (a) twenty-two lesson
plans produced by the experimental group during
school placements, coded for innovation density
(frequency and depth of innovative strategies per
lesson segment) and coherence; and (b) fifty-six
reflective journal entries describing perceived
successes, challenges, and future adaptation plans.
Thematic analysis proceeded through open coding,
axial grouping, and selective synthesis using NVivo 14
software. Integration of quantitative and qualitative
strands followed a side-by-side joint display to identify
convergence, complementarity, and dissonance.
Ethical clearance stemmed from the university’s
Research Ethics Committee; informed consent and
pseudonymisation ensured participant confidentiality.
Descriptive statistics indicated initial parity between
groups on all four sub-scales of the DCI-H. Following the
sixteen-week period, the experimental group achieved
a mean composite score of 4.27 (SD = 0.31) versus 3.68
(SD = 0.35) for the comparison group, yielding a
statistically significant mean difference of 0.59 (t =
5.91, p < 0.001). The largest gains emerged in
methodological design (Δ = 0.71) and assessment
literacy (Δ = 0.65), while reflective
capacity evidenced a
more modest yet significant increase (Δ = 0.44). Within
-
group analysis revealed that the comparison cohort
registered incremental improvement (composite Δ =
0.12) attributable to routine practicum experience, but
these gains lagged markedly behind the experimental
group.
Lesson-plan analysis substantiated quantitative trends.
Plans drafted by ICD participants exhibited higher
innovation density, manifesting as seamless integration
of primary-source analysis tasks, concept-mapping
platforms, and asynchronous discussion boards. For
instance, a unit on Silk Road trade routes incorporated
geospatial digital mapping and role-play diplomatic
negotiations
to
illuminate
historiographical
contingency. Coherence scores also improved,
reflecting clearer alignment among learning objectives,
instructional activities, and formative assessment
checkpoints. Conversely, plans from the comparison
group predominantly relied on teacher explanations
and textbook worksheets, with innovations limited to
occasional multimedia slide projections.
Reflective journals enriched numerical findings by
revealing lived experiences behind competence
growth. Participants recurrently cited the flipped
classroom workshop as catalytic for re-conceiving
International Journal of Pedagogics
54
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)
teacher-student epistemic roles. Early entries disclosed
anxiety over relinquishing content control, whereas
later
entries
celebrated
student-generated
interpretations and heightened classroom dialogue.
Challenges recorded included unreliable internet
connectivity in placement schools, insufficient time to
master unfamiliar software, and scepticism from
mentor teachers accustomed to traditional lecture
formats. Notably, participants who encountered
supportive
mentors
reported
smoother
implementation trajectories and greater confidence in
adapting innovations to resource-constrained contexts.
The empirical evidence advances two principal claims.
First, structured immersion in innovative instructional
methods yields substantive enhancement of didactic
competence among pre-service history teachers. Gains
in methodological design and assessment literacy
affirm that innovation does not merely diversify
classroom aesthetics but fundamentally reconfigures
teachers’
capacity
to
orchestrate
knowledge
construction and evaluate cognitive growth. Such
findings resonate with constructivist teacher-education
research asserting that experiential engagement with
learner-centred pedagogy fosters durable professional
dispositions.
Second, the translation of innovation-derived
competence from university workshops to school
placements hinges on supportive ecological conditions.
Digital infrastructure deficits and mentor-teacher
conservatism attenuate the impact of well-designed
university modules, echoing socio-ecological models
that locate teacher learning within nested contextual
layers. The literature on change agency underscores
that novice teachers occupy liminal professional
identities, negotiating institutional norms while
experimenting with personal pedagogical philosophies.
Accordingly, the study underscores the necessity of
synchronising university interventions with school-site
mentorship calibration and systemic hardware
upgrades.
Comparative perspectives further contextualise
results. Studies in South Korea and Portugal report
similar competency gains through blended practicum
models but caution that sustainability falters when
national assessment regimes emphasise rote recall.
Uzbekistan’s ongoing curricular reforms appear poised
to mitigate this tension by elevating inquiry-based
history standards; however, alignment with high-stakes
examinations remains incomplete. Hence, embedding
innovative methods within licensure exams and
performance evaluations could institutionalise the
impetus for didactic transformation.
Limitations of the present study include non-random
group assignment, a relatively small sample size, and
reliance on self-reported inventories susceptible to
social desirability bias. Future research should
incorporate longitudinal designs tracking in-service
trajectory of competence retention and triangulate
findings with classroom observation protocols
capturing authentic practice.
The Innovation-Centred Didactics module at Gulistan
State University demonstrably strengthened the
didactic competence of future history teachers,
confirming that deliberate cultivation of innovative
pedagogies constitutes a viable lever for professional
growth. Quantitative enhancements in methodological
design, assessment literacy, and reflective capacity
coalesced with qualitative evidence of richer lesson
planning and adaptive pedagogical reasoning.
Nevertheless, the magnitude of these gains remains
conditioned by institutional ecosystems; digital
infrastructure
investment
and
mentor-teacher
professional development emerge as pivotal enabling
factors. Policymakers and teacher-education planners
should thus pursue an integrative strategy coupling
innovation-oriented coursework with context-sensitive
support structures to ensure that competence
breakthroughs achieved in university settings translate
into sustained classroom impact.
REFERENCES
Dewey J. Democracy and education. New York:
Macmillan; 1916. 434 p.
Shulman L.S. Those who understand: knowledge
growth in teaching // Educational Researcher. 1986.
Vol. 15, No 2. P. 4-14.
Dooly M., Sadler R. Becoming little scientists:
technological affordances for peer‐collaborative
inquiry // Language Learning & Technology. 2020. Vol.
24, No 2. P. 1-22.
Jonassen D.H. Learning to solve problems with
technology: a constructivist perspective. 4th ed. Upper
Saddle River: Pearson; 2015. 454 p.
Ministry of Preschool and School Education of the
Republic of Uzbekistan. National curriculum for general
secondary education. Tashkent: MPSSE; 2022. 112 p.
Hmelo-Silver C.E., Duncan R.G., Chinn C.A. Scaffolding
and achievement in problem-based and inquiry
learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark //
Educational Psychologist. 2007. Vol. 42, No 2. P. 99-
107.
Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change. 5th
ed. New York: Teachers College Press; 2021. 338 p.
Kozhanov K., Nazirjanova M. Integrating digital
simulations in Uzbek teacher training: a pilot study //
Central Asian Journal of Pedagogy. 2023. Vol. 5, No 4.
International Journal of Pedagogics
55
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)
P. 67-83.
Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological pedagogical
content knowledge: a framework for teacher
knowledge // Teachers College Record. 2006. Vol. 108,
No 6. P. 1017-1054.
UNESCO. Futures of education: learning to become.
Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2021. 185 p.
