THE HISTORICAL CONDITION OF SETTLEMENTS IN THE GUZOR BEKLIK AT THE END OF THE 19TH – BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY

Abstract

This topic focuses on the historical condition of settlements in the territory of Guzor Beklik during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It analyzes the formation of towns and villages within the Beklik, their administrative-territorial structure, population size, daily life, economic activity, transportation routes, and market infrastructure. Based on historical sources and archival documents, the study explores the socio-economic significance of these settlements, forms of local governance, and cultural life. This research provides a crucial scientific foundation for the study of the historical geography and development of the Guzor Beklik's settlement system.

International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics
Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2023
inLibrary
Google Scholar
 
Branch of knowledge
CC BY f
198-202
0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Xoliqov , G. (2025). THE HISTORICAL CONDITION OF SETTLEMENTS IN THE GUZOR BEKLIK AT THE END OF THE 19TH – BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY. International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics, 1(4), 198–202. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/ijpse/article/view/125151
0
Citations
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus
International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics

Abstract

This topic focuses on the historical condition of settlements in the territory of Guzor Beklik during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It analyzes the formation of towns and villages within the Beklik, their administrative-territorial structure, population size, daily life, economic activity, transportation routes, and market infrastructure. Based on historical sources and archival documents, the study explores the socio-economic significance of these settlements, forms of local governance, and cultural life. This research provides a crucial scientific foundation for the study of the historical geography and development of the Guzor Beklik's settlement system.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

198

THE HISTORICAL CONDITION OF SETTLEMENTS IN THE GUZOR BEKLIK AT

THE END OF THE 19TH – BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY

Xoliqov G’olib

Associate Professor at the University of Information Technology and Management

Ergasheva Marjona Khidir qizi

Student of History University of Information Technologies and Management

Annotation:

This topic focuses on the historical condition of settlements in the territory of

Guzor Beklik during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It analyzes the formation of towns

and villages within the Beklik, their administrative-territorial structure, population size, daily life,

economic activity, transportation routes, and market infrastructure. Based on historical sources

and archival documents, the study explores the socio-economic significance of these settlements,

forms of local governance, and cultural life. This research provides a crucial scientific

foundation for the study of the historical geography and development of the Guzor Beklik's

settlement system.

Keywords:

Guzor Beklik, settlements, historical geography, urban planning, agriculture,

demography, late 19th century, early 20th century, administrative-territorial structure, society,

economic life, lifestyle.

Introduction.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Guzor Beklik (or province) existed

as a distinct administrative-territorial unit within the Bukhara Emirate, encompassing the

southwestern part of the Kashkadarya oasis. During this period—particularly the second half of

the 19th century and the early years of the 20th century—the Kashkadarya region consisted of

administrative units referred to as “beklik” or “viloyat,” including Qarshi, Chiroqchi, Khuzor

(Guzor), Yakkabogʻ, Shahrisabz, and Kitob.

These units, similar to other regions of the Emirate, contained numerous smaller administrative

divisions known as “amlok” (estate, property), each comprising dozens or even hundreds of

villages. It is important to note that during this era, the Bukhara Emirate was administratively

divided into 27 bekliks, including Karmana, Khatirchi, Ziyovuddin, Nurata, Qarshi, Kitob,

Shahrisabz, Chiroqchi, Yakkabogʻ, Khuzor (Guzor), Boysun, Sherobod, Denov, Karki, Chorjuy,

Hisor, Kulob, Qorategin, Darvoz, Baljuvon, Shughnon-Rushon, Qorqontepa, Qobadiyon, Kalif,

Bòrdaliq, and Qobogli.Each beklik was governed by a bek, appointed by the emir himself. The

bekliks were divided into amlokliks, which were administered by amlokdors, also appointed by

the beks

1

.

Territorially, the Guzor Beklik included not only the present-day Guzor district but also

encompassed the current Dehqonobod district and part of the Qamashi district, specifically the

villages adjacent to Guzor. It bordered Qarshi Beklik in the northwest, Yakkabogʻ Beklik in the

northeast, Boysun and Sherobod Bekliks in the south, and Karki Beklik in the southwest.

Additionally, the population of Guzor Beklik maintained relatively close economic and cultural

ties with neighboring territories such as Chiroqchi in the north, Shahrisabz in the northeast,

Burdaliq in the west, Kalif (Kelif) in the southwest, and Denov in the southeast.

The administrative center of Khuzor (Guzor) Beklik was the city of Guzor. The beklik included

several amlokliks, namely: Afghonbogʻ, Eskibogʻ, Yorti-tepa, Oʻrayi-kalon, Karsang, Garmiston,

1

Материалы по районированию Средней Азии. Кн.1: Территория и населения Бухары и Хорезма. Часть 1:

Бухара. – Т.: Туркпечать, 1926. – С. 63-64.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

199

Qamay, Beliboyli, and Gurshak. A significant portion of these amlokliks were situated in the

southern and southwestern parts of the Kashkadarya oasis, adjacent to the Surkhandarya oasis

across mountainous terrain.

Compared to other regions of the Kashkadarya oasis, Guzor Beklik was divided into fewer

amlokliks. Among them, Garmiston included a part of the villages located northwest of Guzor

city; Afghonbogʻ encompassed villages to the north of Guzor; and Beliboyli included several

villages located in the southeastern part of the beklik

2

.

Of the nine amlokliks in Guzor Beklik, some are rooted in Turkic (Uzbek) languages, while

others are based on Iranian (Sogdian, Tajik) linguistic origins. Among the amlokliks of Guzor,

the names Yortitepa, Qamay, and Beli-boyli are of Turkic origin; Eskibogʻ and Oʻra-i Kalon

reflect a blend of Turkic and Persian; while Gurshak and Garmiston derive from Iranian

(Sogdian, Persian-Tajik) terms. The name of Afghonbogʻ amloklik may possibly be associated

with Afghan merchants who were active in trade in the city of Guzor. Such naming of the Guzor

amlokliks is clearly connected to the socio-cultural and ethnic context of the period. The region

was primarily inhabited by Uzbeks and Tajiks, with some Arab communities as well.

Most of these amlokliks included dozens of villages, many of which were linked to various

Uzbek tribes such as the Qovchin, Qongirot, Saroy, and Batosh. In addition, the city of Guzor

and its surroundings were home to Uzbek populations who did not associate themselves with any

specific tribal affiliation; they were mainly engaged in agriculture, gardening, trade, and

craftsmanship.Tajiks were represented by Persian-speaking artisans and merchants living in

Guzor city and by a highland ethnic group known as the “Harduri” residing in the southern

mountainous parts of the beklik. Moreover, in the northwestern part of Guzor Beklik, bordering

Qarshi Beklik, Arabs were also present. A portion of Guzor’s population consisted of Arabs,

particularly those living in areas close to Qarshi

3

.

Based on the documents of the Bukhara Emirate compiled in 1914, we present the names of the

populated areas – villages – within the amlokliks of Guzor

4

.

According to documents of the Bukhara Emirate from 1914, the following villages were part of

the amlokliks within Guzor Beklik:

In the Eskibogʻ amloklik, there were 26 villages: Abu Vays, Oqtosh, Gulcha, Harduri, Jarariq,

Jar Qoravul, Echki Qirildi, Qayirma, Eskibogʻ, Quduq-i Qoraboy, Qongirot, Panj Kamar,

Tavakkal, Tozgoʻzar, Toshgoʻzar, Khoja Chahor Dakh, Chavghon, Chirrovuq, Chunagor, Chur

Tamah, Chuchuk, Shakarbuloq, Shoʻrarna, Shoʻr Quduq, Shoʻrcha.

In the Gurshak amloklik, there were 31 villages: Aygʻir-uba, Oq Dahana, Bol Quduq, Gurshaki

Bolo, Gurshaki Poyon, Gushmon, Dakhdor, Juychoq, Zirakcha, Yetti Quduq, Kalta Poy, Kon,

Qizilcha, Qiz Quduq, Qiyomat Sharm, Qirginchaq, Lalloq, Sabotli, Sang Suloq, Takham,

Tandircha, Tulash, Turna Soy, Ulus Qanchuqli, Khoja Balos, Khoja Guluk, Husayn Shaykh,

Changaruq, Chighon, Chiroqchi, Juychoq.

In the Yorti-tepa amloklik, there were 26 villages: Oynakoʻl, Juychoq, Akhanguzar, Gunatoy,

Dovud, Kaltatoy, Qora Kamar, Qorongʻi Koʻl, Katta Qishloq, Qizil Buloq, Qishliq, Quboi Kalon,

Quboi Khurd, Koʻk Boʻynoq, Qutchi, Qoshtamghali, Murodboy, Nogohon, Sawsan, Tol, Toli

Bolo, Toli Poyon, Uch Tepa, Khon Tushdi, Khudoyor, Shayton.

2

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.) Материалы к исторической

географии Средней Азии. Под. Ред. А.Р. Мухаммеджанова. – Т.: Университет, 2001. – С. 297-304.

3

Ражабов Р. Ўзбекистондаги араблар тарихи ва этноргафияси. – T.: Sharq, 2012. – Б. 191-205.

4

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.). Материалы к исторической

географии Средней Азии. – С. 297-304.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

200

In the Oʻra-i Kalon amloklik, there were 18 villages: Oq Dahana, Boʻzastar, Govkhona, Zarang

Buloq, Yongʻoqliq, Qaychiliq, Kalta, Kalta Minor, Konsay, Qorongʻi Koʻl, Qizil Mozor, Koʻka

Buloq, Qoshquduq, Qoshilish, Teraklik, Hayit, Khachcha, Chosh Tepa.

In the Oʻra-i Khurd amloklik, there were 7 villages: Oynakoʻl, Bobo Surkhon, Besh Buloq,

Doricha, Kon, Turk, Uygʻur.

In the Tangʻi Harom amloklik, there were 11 villages: Oqtoshkent, Anarbuloq, Arab, Gumbuloq,

Gʻuroti, Darkhon, Qorakhol, Quruqsay, Khoja Mahmud, Chashma-i Hofizon, Shakarbuloq.

In the Afghonbogʻ amloklik, there were 11 villages: Omon-ota, Afardi, Batosh, Besh Gul,

Jahondodi, Yargʻuvchi, Qamishli, Qoshtepa, Savlughor, Harduri, Qorakoʻz.

In the Garmiston amloklik, there were 11 villages: Jonbaliq-i Poyon, Zang Tepa, Kerait-i Bolo,

Kerait-i Poyon, Qirgʻiz-Saroy, Mojor-i Bolo, Savbogʻi Bolo, Khoja Rozmoz, Chumushli-i Bolo,

Chumushli-i Poyon, Garmiston.

In the Qamay amloklik, there were 12 villages: Oqguzar, Qozoq, Qayboqchi, Kalon, Qora

Qoʻton, Karvon, Qori Qishloq, Sarv Guzar, Sart Boʻkujali, Oʻlmas, Uch Tut, Xudi Qamay.

Many of the village names in Guzor Beklik come from tribal names, religious or social terms, or

natural-geographic features. For example, in Eskibogʻ amloklik, there are villages like Qongirot

and Harduri; in Gurshak – Ulus Qanchuqli, Khoja Balos (Barlos); in Yorti-tepa – Kaltatoy,

Qishliq, Qutchi, Qoshtamghali; in Oʻra-i Kalon – Qaychili; in Oʻra-i Khurd – Turk and Uygʻur;

in Tangʻi Harom – Arab; in Afghonbogʻ – Batosh and Harduri; in Garmiston – Kerait, Mojor,

Qirgʻiz-Saroy, Chumushli; in Qamay – Qozoq, Sart-Boʻkujali.

Most of these names are connected to Uzbek tribes such as Qongirot, Barlos, Kaltatoy, Qishliq,

Qutchi, Batosh, Turk, Uygʻur, Kerait, Mojor, Qirgʻiz, Saroy, and Qozoq. These are also

mentioned in the famous list of “92 Uzbek clans” from the 16th to early 20th centuries

5

.

At this point, it should be noted that a significant portion of the villages within Guzor Beklik

were settlements inhabited by members of the Qongirot tribe. For example, in villages such as

Ulus Qanchuqli, Qaychili, and Qoshtamghali, residents belonged to subgroups of the Qongirot

tribe, specifically to the Ulus and Qaychili branches. In particular, the village of Qaychili in the

Oʻra-i Kalon amloklik was formed as an ethnonymic toponym, associated with the Qaychili

subgroup of the Qongirot tribe.

In the early 20th century, in his work "Tarikh-i Humoyun," Muhammad Sodiqkhoja Gulshani

also mentioned this ethnonym as one of the branches of the Qongirot tribe.

The first part of the village name Ulus Qanchuqli in the Gurshak amloklik likely refers to the

Ulus group, which is a branch of the Qongirot tribe. Villages with the name Ulus can be found in

several regions of present-day Uzbekistan, and in the early 20th century, many of their residents

identified themselves as belonging to a branch of the Qongirot tribe. Especially, subgroups like

Qanjighali and Qoshtamghali were large tribal divisions that were also known by these names

6

.

The name of the village Qoshtamghali, located in the Yorti-tepa amloklik, likely comes from the

fact that it was inhabited by members of the Qoshtamghali clan — one of the major branches of

the Qongirot tribe. It is well known that Qoshtamghali is one of the large subgroups of the Uzbek

Qongirots, and this ethnonym is commonly found among both Uzbeks and other Turkic peoples

7

.

The name Sart-Boʻkujli, found in the Qamay amloklik mentioned above, is also likely an

ethnonymic toponym. In the Qushbegi records, the name is written somewhat unclearly, but it is

5

Султанов Т.И. Опыт анализа традиционных списков 92 «племен илатия» Средняя Азия в древности и

средневековье. – М.: Наука, 1977. – С. 165-176; Асқаров А. Ўзбек халқининг келиб чиқиш тарихи. – Тошкент:

O‘zbekiston, 2015. – Б. 487-490.

6

Бегалиев Н.Б., Туробов А.М. Самарқанд топонимияси. – Самарқанд: СамДЧТИ нашриёти, 2015. – Б. 85.

7

Нафасов Т. Қашқадарё қишлоқномаси. – Б. 402.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

201

probably Sart-Boʻgajili, which is still the name of a village in today’s Qamashi district. The

original root of the word comes from the Hindi term "sartha" or "sart", which meant "merchant."

Later, in some regions, it became an exo-ethnonym and was used to name certain tribal

subgroups.The name Sart-Boʻgajili is formed by combining the ethnonyms Sart and Boʻgajili. A

branch of the Qashqadarya Qongirots known as Voxtamghali had a subgroup called Boʻgajili,

and a smaller part of that subgroup was referred to as Sart

8

According to the Qushbegi records, in the early 20th century, there were villages named Qozoq

and Qozoqli in the Qarshi, Chiroqchi, and Guzor bekliks. These villages were mainly associated

with the Manghit tribe, one of the major Uzbek tribal groups. The village named Qozoq in the

Qamay amloklik of Guzor Beklik may also have been connected to the Manghit tribe. Although

settlements inhabited by members of the Manghit tribe did exist in Guzor Beklik, unlike other

place names, villages bearing the name Manghit were rarely found there. Only once was a

village named Manghit mentioned in the Qushbegi records, located in the Afghonbogʻ amloklik

9

.

At this point, it is worth noting that some of the village names in Guzor Beklik recorded in the

Qushbegi archive also appear in other written sources, particularly in historical works related to

the historiography of the Bukhara Emirate. One of the major historians of the Bukhara Emirate,

Mirzo Somiy (d. 1907), in his work titled "Tarikhi Salotin-i Mangitiya" (“The History of the

Manghit Sultans”), mentions the city of Guzor and several villages within the beklik. For

example, in this work, there is reference to the fortress of the village Yorti-tepa. It describes how

one of the princes of the Bukhara Emirate, Abdumalikkhoja, a political and military figure

known for his opposition to Russian occupation and for uniting anti-colonial forces around

Guzor and its surroundings, passed through this fortress on his way from Khanabad in the Qarshi

Beklik to Shahrisabz

10

. Based on this information, it can be concluded that during that time there

was a fortress in the Yorti-tepa amloklik which functioned as an administrative center. This

suggests that each amloklik likely had its own specific fortress that served as a seat of authority,

where officials such as the amlokdor or amin carried out their duties. It is also worth noting that

while describing the activities of Abdumalikh To‘ra, Mirzo Somiy repeatedly mentions the

Qarshi fortress and also refers to the Yorti-tepa fortress. This indicates that the Yorti-tepa

fortress was of significant strategic importance at the time

11

.

References:

1.

Murodullaevich, B. O. (2024). The fight against infectious diseases of Uzbekistan on

experience. Western European Journal of Historical Events and Social Science, 2(4), 93-97.

2.

Бўронов, О. Қишлоқ врачлик пунктларида тиббий кадрлар салоҳиятини оширишга

қаратилган давлат сиёсати. Ўтмишга назар.№ 7.2023.

3.

Buronov, O. (2025). Changes In The Murobak Gas Processing Plant In The Years Of

Independence. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 40, 62-67.

8

Нафасов Т. Қашқадарё қишлоқномаси. – Б. 228.

9

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.) Материалы исторической географии

Средней Азии. – С. 93.

10

Епифанова Л.М. Неофициальная версия истории Бухары Мирза Абдулазима Сами “Тарихи салатини

мангития дар ас-салтанаи Бухараи шариф” (2- я половина XIX века): Дисс. ... канд. филол. наук. – Ташкент,

1959; Сами Мирза Абдалазим. Тарихи салатини мангития (История мангытских государей) Изд. текста,

пред., пер. и прим. Л.М. Епифановой. – Москва: ИВЛ, 1962. – С. 100.

11

Сами Мирза Абдалазим. Тарихи салатини мангития (История мангытских государей). – С. 99.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

202

4.

Buronov, O., & Davronov, U. B. (2025). Administrative-territorial division and

demographic indicators of Samarkand during the years of independence. International Journal of

Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 405-409.

5.

Buronov, O., & Davronov, U. B. (2025). History of modern construction and urban

development in Samarkand region during the years of independence. International Journal of

Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 410-414.

6.

Buronov, O. (2025). SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN UZBEKISTAN IN THE

40-80-IES OF THE XX CENTURY. BRIDGING THE GAP: EDUCATION AND SCIENCE

FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 1(1), 1160-1168.

7.

Murodullayevich, B. O. (2025). O‘ZBEKISTONDA QISHLOQ JOYLARDA

IJTIMOIY-MAISHIY OMILLARNING AHOLI SALOMATLIGIGA TA’SIRI (XX ASR 50-80

YILLARI). Международный научный журнал, 2(1), 52-58.

8.

Буронов,

О.

(2021).

ЭТАПЫ

РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ

ОЗДОРОВИТЕЛЬНЫХ

МЕРОПРИЯТИЙ В СЕЛЬСКОЙ МЕСТНОСТИ (1991-2021 ГГ.). In ПСИХОЛОГИЯ И

ПЕДАГОГИКА 2021 (pp. 22-26).

9.

Bo‘ronov, O. Qishloq joylarda tibbiy profilaktika va sanitariya-epidemiologik

barqarorlikni ta’minlash ishi tarixi. Journal of Social Sciences, 1(02).

10.

Buronov, O., & Abdulla, B. (2025). LIBRARIES DURING THE TIMURID ERA AND

THEIR SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE. EDUCATION AND RESEARCH IN THE ERA OF

DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, 1(2), 3658-3664.

11.

Buronov, O., & Tursunov, A. (2025). SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL LIFE

OF SAMARKAND REGION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF NURABAD DISTRICT). BRIDGING

THE GAP: EDUCATION

12.

Материалы по районированию Средней Азии. Кн.1: Территория и населения

Бухары и Хорезма. Часть 1: Бухара. – Т.: Туркпечать, 1926. – С. 63-64.

13.

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.) Материалы к

исторической географии Средней Азии.

Под. Ред. А.Р. Мухаммеджанова. – Т.:

Университет, 2001. – С. 297-304.

14.

Ражабов Р. Ўзбекистондаги араблар тарихи ва этноргафияси. – T.: Sharq, 2012. – Б.

191-205.

15.

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.). Материалы к

исторической географии Средней Азии. – С. 297-304.

16.

Султанов Т.И. Опыт анализа традиционных списков 92 «племен илатия» Средняя

Азия в древности и средневековье. – М.: Наука, 1977. – С. 165-176; Асқаров А. Ўзбек

халқининг келиб чиқиш тарихи. – Тошкент: O‘zbekiston, 2015. – Б. 487-490.

17.

Бегалиев Н.Б., Туробов А.М. Самарқанд топонимияси. – Самарқанд: СамДЧТИ

нашриёти, 2015. – Б. 85.

18.

Нафасов Т. Қашқадарё қишлоқномаси. – Б. 402.

19.

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.) Материалы

исторической географии Средней Азии. – С. 93.

20.

Епифанова Л.М. Неофициальная версия истории Бухары Мирза Абдулазима Сами

“Тарихи салатини мангития дар ас-салтанаи Бухараи шариф” (2- я половина XIX века):

Дисс. ... канд. филол. наук. – Ташкент, 1959.

21.

Сами Мирза Абдалазим. Тарихи салатини мангития (История мангытских

государей). – С. 99.

References

Murodullaevich, B. O. (2024). The fight against infectious diseases of Uzbekistan on experience. Western European Journal of Historical Events and Social Science, 2(4), 93-97.

Бўронов, О. Қишлоқ врачлик пунктларида тиббий кадрлар салоҳиятини оширишга қаратилган давлат сиёсати. Ўтмишга назар.№ 7.2023.

Buronov, O. (2025). Changes In The Murobak Gas Processing Plant In The Years Of Independence. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 40, 62-67.

Buronov, O., & Davronov, U. B. (2025). Administrative-territorial division and demographic indicators of Samarkand during the years of independence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 405-409.

Buronov, O., & Davronov, U. B. (2025). History of modern construction and urban development in Samarkand region during the years of independence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 410-414.

Buronov, O. (2025). SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN UZBEKISTAN IN THE 40-80-IES OF THE XX CENTURY. BRIDGING THE GAP: EDUCATION AND SCIENCE FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 1(1), 1160-1168.

Murodullayevich, B. O. (2025). O‘ZBEKISTONDA QISHLOQ JOYLARDA IJTIMOIY-MAISHIY OMILLARNING AHOLI SALOMATLIGIGA TA’SIRI (XX ASR 50-80 YILLARI). Международный научный журнал, 2(1), 52-58.

Буронов, О. (2021). ЭТАПЫ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ ОЗДОРОВИТЕЛЬНЫХ МЕРОПРИЯТИЙ В СЕЛЬСКОЙ МЕСТНОСТИ (1991-2021 ГГ.). In ПСИХОЛОГИЯ И ПЕДАГОГИКА 2021 (pp. 22-26).

Bo‘ronov, O. Qishloq joylarda tibbiy profilaktika va sanitariya-epidemiologik barqarorlikni ta’minlash ishi tarixi. Journal of Social Sciences, 1(02).

Buronov, O., & Abdulla, B. (2025). LIBRARIES DURING THE TIMURID ERA AND THEIR SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE. EDUCATION AND RESEARCH IN THE ERA OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, 1(2), 3658-3664.

Buronov, O., & Tursunov, A. (2025). SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL LIFE OF SAMARKAND REGION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF NURABAD DISTRICT). BRIDGING THE GAP: EDUCATION

Материалы по районированию Средней Азии. Кн.1: Территория и населения Бухары и Хорезма. Часть 1: Бухара. – Т.: Туркпечать, 1926. – С. 63-64.

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.) Материалы к исторической географии Средней Азии. Под. Ред. А.Р. Мухаммеджанова. – Т.: Университет, 2001. – С. 297-304.

Ражабов Р. Ўзбекистондаги араблар тарихи ва этноргафияси. – T.: Sharq, 2012. – Б. 191-205.

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.). Материалы к исторической географии Средней Азии. – С. 297-304.

Султанов Т.И. Опыт анализа традиционных списков 92 «племен илатия» Средняя Азия в древности и средневековье. – М.: Наука, 1977. – С. 165­176; Асқаров А. Ўзбек халқининг келиб чиқиш тарихи. – Тошкент: O‘zbekiston, 2015. – Б. 487-490.

Бегалиев Н.Б., Туробов А.М. Самарқанд топонимияси. – Самарқанд: СамДЧТИ нашриёти, 2015. – Б. 85.

Нафасов Т. Қашқадарё қишлоқномаси. – Б. 402.

Населенные пункты Бухарского эмирата (конец XIX – начало XX в.) Материалы исторической географии Средней Азии. – С. 93.

Епифанова Л.М. Неофициальная версия истории Бухары Мирза Абдулазима Сами “Тарихи салатини мангития дар ас-салтанаи Бухараи шариф” (2я половина XIX века): Дисс. ... канд. филол. наук. – Ташкент, 1959.

Сами Мирза Абдалазим. Тарихи салатини мангития (История мангытских государей). – С. 99.