Authors

  • Ziyoda Kamalova
    University of Management and Future Technologies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.jmsi.109187

Abstract

This scientific research analyzes the sentence, which is the fundamental unit of syntax, and its predicative nature. The sentence serves as the primary means of expressing and conveying human thought, holding a significant place in the language system due to its communicative function. Predicativity, an inseparable grammatical feature of the sentence, manifests through categories such as person, number, tense, mood, and affirmation-negation. The article examines two approaches to predicativity: logical and grammatical perspectives. Predicativity is considered to be formed solely through the subject-predicate relationship and is viewed as the grammatical content of the entire sentence. Additionally, the article distinguishes between the concepts of sentence models and utterances, analyzing the sentence as a general grammatical unit and the utterance as a communicative unit realized in speech. While sentence models are limited, the forms of utterances can appear in infinite variations in speech, as proven by linguistic theories.  


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 4, 2025

254

THE BASIC UNIT OF SENTENCE SYNTAX

Kamalova Ziyoda Mukhamedsobirovna

Senior Teacher, Faculty of Philology and Foreign Languages,

University of Management and Future Technologies

Email: kamalovaziyoda86@gmail.com, Phone: +998933860086

Abstract:

This scientific research analyzes the sentence, which is the fundamental unit of

syntax, and its predicative nature. The sentence serves as the primary means of expressing and

conveying human thought, holding a significant place in the language system due to its

communicative function. Predicativity, an inseparable grammatical feature of the sentence,

manifests through categories such as person, number, tense, mood, and affirmation-negation.

The article examines two approaches to predicativity: logical and grammatical perspectives.

Predicativity is considered to be formed solely through the subject-predicate relationship and is

viewed as the grammatical content of the entire sentence. Additionally, the article distinguishes

between the concepts of sentence models and utterances, analyzing the sentence as a general

grammatical unit and the utterance as a communicative unit realized in speech. While sentence

models are limited, the forms of utterances can appear in infinite variations in speech, as proven

by linguistic theories.

Keywords:

syntax, functional, communicative, objective, predicative person, paradigm,

predicate, modality, definiteness.

Introduction

The sentence, as the fundamental unit of syntax, plays a crucial role in expressing and

conveying human thought, serving as the primary means of communication in any language.

This article explores the concept of predicativity, a defining grammatical feature of sentences

that distinguishes them from other linguistic units like words and phrases. Predicativity,

expressed through categories such as person, number, tense, mood, and affirmation-negation, is

analyzed from both logical and grammatical perspectives, highlighting its role in shaping the

structure and meaning of sentences. Additionally, the article examines the distinction between

sentence models—abstract grammatical structures—and utterances, their realizations in specific

speech contexts, emphasizing the dynamic and infinite nature of language in communication.

Through this analysis, the article aims to deepen the understanding of sentences as the core

units of syntax and their significance in linguistic theory.

Methodology

The sentence is the primary unit of study in syntax. As the main means of forming, expressing,

and conveying human thought, the sentence serves a communicative function, reflecting the

rules of a specific language. Unlike words and phrases, which primarily serve naming functions,

the sentence stands out due to its predicative nature, a feature that distinguishes it as a

communicative unit. For example, "Tom came" and "Tom's coming" convey the same

information but differ in how they express objective content. The former contains predicativity,


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 4, 2025

255

while the latter does not.

Result

Predicativity is considered the grammatical meaning of a sentence. It represents the inseparable

grammatical content of the sentence within the system of forms. Predicativity consists of person,

number, tense, aspect, mood, affirmation-negation, and the forms that express these meanings.

Thus, any syntactic unit possessing such grammatical meaning and its corresponding system of

forms is considered a sentence.

Discussions

Predicativity can be formed in the following ways:
1. Each predicative meaning is expressed through separate forms as components (e.g., negation,

person, tense, modality). For example, in "yoz+ma+sa+(y)+di+ng+iz," five predicative

meanings are expressed through five grammatical forms: -ma (negation), -sa (modality), -di

(tense), -ng (person), -iz (number).
2. A single form can synthetically express multiple meanings. For example, "yoz+ay"

(affirmation, definiteness, future tense, first person) or "I’m a student" (affirmation, definiteness,

present tense, first person, singular).
3. The infinitive form without "to" can be determined based on its paradigm. For example,

"yoz+ay" and "Let me write" share similar grammatical meanings.
4. A zero form, determined by the speech context, can also express predicativity. For example,

"Spring" becomes a sentence when it expresses existence, person, number, and tense through

the speech situation.

Conclusion

In summary, predicativity is the primary grammatical category of a sentence, consisting of

affirmation, negation, modality, tense, person, and number.
Modern syntactic theories recognize predicativity as the defining feature of a sentence, though

it is not an independent unit. Two perspectives exist regarding its nature and structure:
1. The first perspective views predicativity as the relationship between the subject and predicate,

influenced by logical approaches. This perspective considers predicativity as the basis of both

judgment and sentence structure.
2. The second perspective, introduced by V.V. Vinogradov, treats predicativity as a holistic

grammatical meaning of the sentence, not limited to subject-predicate relations. This view

emphasizes that predicativity is expressed through syntactic categories like modality, tense, and

person.
The term "sentence"

refers to a generalized grammatical unit, while "utterance"

(высказывание) refers to its realization in speech. Sentence models are limited and typified,

whereas utterances can appear in infinite variations. For example, English has only seven core

sentence models, yet the number of grammatically and semantically correct sentences derived

from them exceeds 3×10³², far more than the number of seconds in a century.

References:


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 4, 2025

256

1. Moskalskaya O.M. Theoretical Syntax of the German Language. M., 1973.
2. Shvedova N.Yu. Grammar of the Modern Russian Language. M.: Nauka, 1970.
3. Vinogradov V.V. The Russian Language. M.: Nauka, 1970.
4. Blok M.Ya. Theoretical Foundations of Grammar. M.: VSh, 1983.
Online resources:
1.https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/syntax
2.https://www.cambridge.org/core/subjects/linguistics/syntax-and-morphology
3.https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=syntax+predicativity
4.https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/ac

References

Moskalskaya O.M. Theoretical Syntax of the German Language. M., 1973.

Shvedova N.Yu. Grammar of the Modern Russian Language. M.: Nauka, 1970.

Vinogradov V.V. The Russian Language. M.: Nauka, 1970.

Blok M.Ya. Theoretical Foundations of Grammar. M.: VSh, 1983.

Online resources: