Authors

  • Allamurat Xojasov
    Karakalpakstan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.jmsi.111821

Abstract

This article discusses the impact of water-saving irrigation methods on the growth, development and yield of cotton, their application in irrigation systems and the role of these technologies in the effective management of water resources in agriculture. The article highlights the introduction of irrigation systems into agriculture, as well as the study of the influence of important factors on plant irrigation, the usefulness of these technologies in optimizing the irrigation schedule based on meteorological data, soil conditions, plant needs and other important indicators.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 4, 2025

977

THE IMPACT OF THE APPLICATION OF WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION

METHODS ON THE GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND YIELD OF COTTON

Allamurat Xojasov

Karakalpakstan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnology,

Department of Farming and Agricultural

Crop Selection and Seed Production, Associate Professor (Ph.D.)

Abstract:

This article discusses the impact of water-saving irrigation methods on the growth,

development and yield of cotton, their application in irrigation systems and the role of these

technologies in the effective management of water resources in agriculture. The article highlights

the introduction of irrigation systems into agriculture, as well as the study of the influence of

important factors on plant irrigation, the usefulness of these technologies in optimizing the

irrigation schedule based on meteorological data, soil conditions, plant needs and other important

indicators.

Keywords:

irrigation systems, agriculture, cotton, water resources management, irrigation

optimization, technologies, soil monitoring, drainage, sprinkler irrigation, drip irrigation, flood

irrigation, central circulation irrigation.

In the system of agrotechnologies of cotton care, feeding with mineral fertilizers at the

appropriate time and rates and properly organizing irrigation leads to a lag in cotton growth and

development, and ultimately a decrease in cotton yield. Studying the impact of different methods

of irrigation of cotton on the growth and development of the plant and cotton yield is of great

scientific and practical importance. In conditions of shortage of irrigation water, rational use of

existing water sources and introduction of technologies that improve the quality of crop

irrigation are becoming a requirement of the time.

In the conditions of Tashkent region, where the groundwater table is deep, the mechanical

composition is heavy loam, and typical gray soils, the growth and development of cotton, the

accumulation of crop elements, and the weight of cotton crop are studied by irrigating cotton

through a simple furrow and between rows with black polyethylene film and winter wheat straw

in layers along the furrow. The studies were conducted in the cotton fields of the Akqovok

experimental plot of the PSUEAITI during 2012-2014. The experimental system is presented in

Table 1. In the field experiment, each plot area was 240 m2, arranged in three rotations, in one

layer. The cotton variety "Navruz" was planted in the experiment. Irrigation was carried out with

a soil moisture content of 70-70-60% relative to the ChDNS. In the research, all observations,

measurements and analyses were carried out on the basis of the methodological manual

“Methodology of field experiments with cotton in irrigation conditions” adopted by PSUEAITI

(Former UzPITI), agrotechnical measures were carried out in the manner adopted on the farm. In

the experiment, in order to study the effect of different irrigation methods, namely, black

polyethylene film and winter wheat straw mulching at different distances between rows and

irrigation efficiency on the growth and development of cotton, phenological observations were

carried out on 50 plants in each variant and replicate at the beginning of June, July, August and

September.

As can be seen from the results of the data obtained during the years of experimentation, during

the observations conducted in June, there was almost no difference between the experimental

variants in terms of plant height and number of leaflets, and the average plant height was 10.2-


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 4, 2025

978

15.1 cm, and the number of leaflets was 4.3-5.4.

By August, in the control variant 1, which was irrigated through a regular trench and in the

variant 2, which was irrigated alternately with the regular trench, the average plant height was

77.8-82.1 cm, the yield was 12.5-14.4 grains per stalk, 4.7-7.0 grains per node, and 6.4-8.2 grains

per cob. In the variants 3-4, which were irrigated alternately with the regular trench and in the

variants 3-4, which were irrigated alternately with the row-to-row and alternately with the row-

to-row, the plant height was 82.5-89.2 cm, the yield was 14.0-15.8 grains per stalk, 5.3-7.5 grains

per node, and 7.5-8.5 grains per cob. The first two-thirds of the field was covered with black

polyethylene film and the last third was covered with winter wheat straw. In variants 5-6, which

were irrigated with winter wheat straw inter-row and alternately alternating rows, this indicator

was 85.7-97.2; cm; 13.8-15.7 grains; 6.4-8.7 grains and 7.9-9.2 grains, respectively.

Cotton yield was calculated for each harvest according to the experimental variants, the data

obtained are presented in Table 3. According to the results obtained, in the 1st variant, which

was irrigated with inter-row irrigation through a simple furrow and the 2nd control variant,

which was irrigated with alternating rows from a simple furrow, the average annual yield was

27.1-29.8; 29.3-31.2; 30.6-30.9 centners, in variants 3-4, where the upper two-thirds of the plot

was covered with ordinary straw and the last third with winter wheat straw, inter-row

Cotton yield index in the experimental field, c/ha (Shamsiev A.S.2015).

2012 year

2013 year

2014 year

Cotton

yield, c/ga

Additional

cotton

harvest, c/ga

Cotton yield,

c/ga

Additional

cotton

harvest,,

c/ga

Cotton yield,

c/ga

Additional

cotton

harvest, c/ga

1

27,1

-

29,3

-

30,6

-

2

29,8

-

31,2

-

30,9

-

3

31,6

4,5

32,1

2,8

33,3

2,7

4

32,1

2,3

33,1

1,9

34,2

3,3

5

34,3

7,2

34,9

5,6

37,9

7,3

6

36,6

6,8

35,5

4,3

39,0

8,1

Compared to the control variant 1, which was irrigated with a regular furrow and alternating

rows, the third variant, which was irrigated with a regular furrow in the beginning two-thirds of

the field and winter wheat straw in the last third of the field, yielded an average of 4.5; 2.8; 2.7

centners per hectare, and the fifth variant, which was irrigated with a black polyethylene film in

the upper two-thirds of the field and winter wheat straw in the last third, yielded an average of

7.2; 5.6; 7.3 centners per hectare.

The fourth variant, which was irrigated with a regular furrow and alternating rows in the last

third of the field, yielded an average of 2.3; 1.9; 3.3 centners and the option 6, which was

irrigated alternately with black polyethylene film in the upper two-thirds of the field and winter

wheat straw in the lower one-third, achieved an average additional cotton yield of 6.8; 4.3; 8.1

centners per hectare.

In general, by mulching the rows between the rows with black polyethylene film and winter

wheat straw in layers along the field, when the method of inter-row and alternate row irrigation

was used during the growing season, a favorable agrobiological environment was created for the

growth and development of the plant due to uniform soil moisture, prevention of washing out of

the fertile topsoil layer, and reduction of unnecessary evaporation of moisture. Also, mulching

the cotton rows with black polyethylene film and winter wheat straw improved the water,

nutrient, heat, and air regimes in the soil layer where the plant's root system was distributed, and

increased the activity of microorganisms.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 4, 2025

979

References

1. Artukmetov Z., Sheraliev X. Fundamentals of crop irrigation. T. 2007
2. Norkulov U., Sheraliev X. Agricultural reclamation. T. 2003
3. S.Azimboev, B.Tokhtashev, T. Qarabayeva, E.Berdiboev. Practical and experimental

exercises in agricultural reclamation and land management. Tashkent 2012.

Additional literature

1. I.A.Karimov "Agricultural development is a source of poverty", T. 1994.
2. I.A.Karimov "Agricultural development is a source of abundant life" 1998 T. .
3. Lev V.T., Gramatovich M.K. "Drainage on saline lands of Uzbekistan" Mekhnat, 1987.

References

Artukmetov Z., Sheraliev X. Fundamentals of crop irrigation. T. 2007

Norkulov U., Sheraliev X. Agricultural reclamation. T. 2003

S.Azimboev, B.Tokhtashev, T. Qarabayeva, E.Berdiboev. Practical and experimental exercises in agricultural reclamation and land management. Tashkent 2012.