https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
490
TASHKENT UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND PEDAGOGY
A pragmatic analysis of slang in modern English (based on internet platforms)
Rustamov Dastonjon Uktam ugli
e-mail:
Abstract:
This study investigates the pragmatic functions of slang in contemporary English as
used on two major internet platforms: Twitter and Reddit. Drawing on qualitative data from 100
authentic online interactions, the research explores how slang operates beyond its lexical
meaning to perform a range of context-sensitive communicative functions. Utilizing frameworks
from Speech Act Theory, Grice’s Cooperative Principle, and Politeness Theory, the study
identifies key pragmatic roles of slang, including expressing solidarity, managing face,
performing humor and irony, and amplifying emotional stance. Findings reveal that users on
both platforms strategically deploy slang to align socially with their audiences, negotiate
disagreement, and enhance expressivity—often in ways shaped by platform-specific norms and
affordances. The study highlights the importance of treating slang as a legitimate and dynamic
resource in digital pragmatics and calls for broader, multimodal, and cross-cultural research to
capture its evolving role in online communication.
Keywords:
Discourse analysis, Internet language, Pragmatics, Slang, Social media
1. Introduction
Language is in a constant state of evolution, adapting to the communicative needs and cultural
shifts of its users. Among the most dynamic and fluid aspects of language is slang—informal,
often playful or subversive language that emerges within particular communities and spreads
rapidly, particularly through digital communication. While traditionally associated with youth
culture or marginalized groups, slang has now become a central feature of everyday interaction
on internet platforms, influencing not only vocabulary but also pragmatic choices in online
discourse.
In recent years, the explosion of social media and participatory digital spaces has
transformed the way slang is created, shared, and understood. Platforms such as Twitter, Reddit,
and TikTok have given rise to a new breed of slang expressions that are often multimodal,
context-dependent, and richly pragmatic. These expressions do more than convey lexical
meaning; they signal group membership, enact humor or irony, and navigate social norms—
functions that are deeply rooted in the pragmatics of language use.
Despite growing interest in online language practices, the study of slang remains
underrepresented in pragmatic research. Much of the existing literature has focused on the lexical
or sociolinguistic aspects of slang, often overlooking its pragmatic dimensions—how slang
functions within actual interactions, what intentions it serves, and how it shapes interpersonal
dynamics. This gap is particularly evident in studies of internet discourse, where slang operates
not just as vocabulary but as a tool for performing identity, managing politeness, and negotiating
meaning in real time.
This study aims to address that gap by offering a pragmatic analysis of slang as used on
contemporary internet platforms. By examining naturally occurring interactions on Twitter,
Reddit, and TikTok, this research investigates the ways in which slang expressions function
within their communicative contexts. Drawing on frameworks such as Speech Act Theory,
Grice’s Cooperative Principle, and Politeness Theory, the analysis explores how slang
contributes to meaning-making, social alignment, and discourse coherence in online
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
491
environments.
In doing so, the study not only enriches our understanding of pragmatic variation in digital
communication but also highlights the evolving nature of slang as a linguistic and social
phenomenon. It offers insights into how language adapts pragmatically in virtual spaces where
brevity, wit, and shared cultural knowledge are key to successful communication.
2. Literature Review
Slang has long occupied a paradoxical place in linguistic research. Often dismissed as ephemeral
or non-standard, it is simultaneously recognized as a powerful marker of identity, in-group
solidarity, and linguistic innovation (Eble, 1996; Coleman, 2012). Traditionally studied within
sociolinguistics and lexicography, slang is increasingly gaining attention in studies of digital
discourse due to its vibrant role in shaping online communication. However, its pragmatic
functions—how slang operates in context to convey meaning, intentions, and social
relationships—remain relatively underexplored.
2.1. Slang in Sociolinguistics and Cultural Studies
Historically, slang has been approached as a sociolect—language tied to particular groups such
as youth, subcultures, or occupational communities (Labov, 1972; Eckert, 2000). Scholars have
emphasized its role in constructing social identity, resisting authority, or fostering group
cohesion (Matthews, 2007; Bucholtz, 2009). In these frameworks, slang is often viewed as a
sociocultural tool: one that signals alignment, exclusion, rebellion, or intimacy. While these
perspectives provide insight into who uses slang and why, they tend to treat slang primarily as a
lexical or stylistic phenomenon, with limited attention to how it functions in real-time interaction.
2.2. Digital Discourse and the Emergence of Online Slang
With the advent of social media, the production and circulation of slang have become more
visible, immediate, and participatory. Internet users actively generate new terms, recycle old
ones, and attach slang to memes, hashtags, and trending content. Research on digital discourse
has begun to explore this phenomenon, focusing on the rapid spread of slang across platforms
and its evolution through user engagement (Crystal, 2011; Tagg, 2015; Zappavigna, 2018).
Studies have shown how slang varies across communities like Twitter users or Reddit forums,
often shaped by platform norms and user interaction styles (Androutsopoulos, 2014; Sharma &
Brookes, 2022).
Yet even in this emerging div of work, the pragmatic dimension of slang—how it
achieves communicative goals such as persuasion, politeness, or humor—remains largely
unaddressed. Researchers tend to categorize slang semantically or trace its etymology rather than
examine its usage in interactional context.
2.3. Pragmatics and the Function of Informal Language
Pragmatics, concerned with meaning-in-use, offers valuable tools for analyzing how slang
operates in everyday communication. Foundational frameworks such as Speech Act Theory
(Austin, 1962; Searle, 1975), Grice’s Cooperative Principle (Grice, 1975), and Politeness Theory
(Brown & Levinson, 1987) provide lenses for examining how speakers use language to perform
actions, convey implied meanings, and negotiate social relationships. These frameworks have
been applied extensively to informal and digital language, particularly in examining politeness
strategies, implicature, and expressive language in online settings (Herring, 2007; Locher &
Graham, 2010).
Some studies have begun to explore how humor, irony, or affect are expressed through
informal online language (Dynel, 2016; Bou-Franch et al., 2019). However, few focus
specifically on slang as the vehicle for such pragmatic effects. This is surprising given that slang,
by its very nature, often carries connotative, indexical, or context-dependent meaning that goes
beyond literal interpretation. Slang can act as a form of social indexing, pragmatic softening or
intensification, or implicit stance-taking—functions that align closely with core concerns of
pragmatics.
2.4. The Research Gap
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
492
Despite growing interest in digital discourse and informal language, there is a notable gap in
empirical research that analyzes slang pragmatically—especially using naturally occurring data
from internet platforms like Twitter and Reddit. Most existing studies either describe slang
lexically or analyze general informal speech without focusing on slang as a distinct pragmatic
tool. Furthermore, cross-platform studies comparing how slang operates in different digital
environments remain rare, leaving questions about how platform affordances influence
pragmatic use unresolved.
2.5. Contribution of the Present Study
This study addresses this gap by offering a cross-platform, context-sensitive pragmatic analysis
of slang in online discourse. By examining interactions on Twitter and Reddit, it investigates
how slang is used to perform speech acts, manage politeness, express alignment or distancing,
and construct digital identities. The study applies established pragmatic theories to new,
culturally significant linguistic data, contributing both to the study of internet language and to
broader pragmatic theory by illustrating how meaning is dynamically constructed through slang
in real-time digital communication.
2.6. Research Questions
Grounded in the principles of pragmatic theory and informed by recent studies on digital
discourse, this study addresses the following research questions:
1.
What pragmatic functions do slang expressions serve in online discourse across Twitter
and Reddit?
2.
How are these functions shaped by platform-specific norms and communicative
affordances?
3.
In what ways do slang expressions contribute to the performance of speech acts and the
generation of implicatures in digital interactions?
4.
How is slang used to construct, maintain, or challenge social relationships in internet-
based communication?
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Design
This study employs a qualitative descriptive research design grounded in pragmatic analysis and
informed by discourse analysis principles. The objective is to investigate the pragmatic functions
of slang expressions in online interactions, with particular attention to meaning in context,
speech act realization, and social relationship management. A qualitative approach was chosen to
allow for an in-depth exploration of language use as it naturally occurs in digital communication
settings.
3.2. Data Collection
3.2.1. Data Sources
The linguistic data for this study were drawn from two major social media platforms: Twitter and
Reddit. These platforms were selected due to their wide user base, informal discourse style, and
high density of slang in public communication. Twitter provides a space for brief, performative
utterances often shaped by trending topics, while Reddit allows for more extended and threaded
discussions organized around topic-specific communities.
3.2.2 Sampling Procedure
A purposive sampling strategy was adopted to ensure the inclusion of content rich in slang and
informal language. Specific subreddits (e.g., r/teenagers, r/Ask Reddit, r/Out Of The Loop) and
Twitter hashtags or trending topics were identified as likely sources of slang-heavy discourse.
The following criteria guided the selection of data:
Posts or comments written in English
Content publicly accessible and free of personal identifiers
Examples that included at least one slang expression
Timeframe: January 2023 – March 2025
A total of 100 samples were collected: 50 from Reddit comment threads and 50 from Twitter
posts and replies. Each sample consisted of a short exchange or post of 3–10 lines of discourse.
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
493
3.3. Analytical Framework
The analysis was conducted within the frameworks of established pragmatic theories, particularly:
Speech Act Theory (Austin, 1962; Searle, 1975), to examine how slang expressions
contribute to illocutionary force;
Grice’s Cooperative Principle and Maxims (Grice, 1975), to identify instances of
implicature and strategic maxim flouting;
Politeness Theory (Brown & Levinson, 1987), to explore how slang is used to manage
face, mitigate threats, or express solidarity;
Relevance Theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986), to interpret how users infer meaning
through shared context and cultural cues.
These frameworks facilitated a systematic examination of how slang is pragmatically
deployed in digital communication.
3.4. Coding and Analysis Procedure
The analysis followed a thematic coding process in three stages:
1.
Initial coding: All slang expressions were identified and annotated within their immediate
discourse context.
2.
Functional categorization: Each instance was coded according to its pragmatic function,
such as humor, criticism, face-saving, irony, group alignment, or distancing.
3.
Cross-platform comparison: The use and function of slang were compared between
Twitter and Reddit to assess how platform affordances influenced pragmatic deployment.
Coding was conducted manually and iteratively, allowing for themes to emerge organically while
remaining grounded in theoretical constructs. A small portion of the data (15%) was cross-
checked by a second coder to ensure consistency, achieving a high level of intercoder agreement.
3.5. Ethical Considerations
Only publicly available data were used, and no private or login-restricted content was accessed.
Usernames and other identifiable information were anonymized or excluded to protect individual
privacy. The study adhered to the ethical guidelines for internet-mediated research as outlined by
the British Psychological Society (2021) and relevant institutional review protocols.
3.6. Trustworthiness and Rigor
To ensure the credibility and transparency of the research process:
Triangulation was applied by analyzing data from two distinct platforms.
Thick description was employed to present contextualized excerpts that illustrate slang
usage in interaction.
An audit trail documented all coding decisions and category definitions to ensure
dependability and transparency.
4. Results
The analysis of 100 samples—50 from Reddit and 50 from Twitter—revealed a range of
pragmatic functions for slang expressions in online discourse. Slang was not only a lexical
choice but a strategic communicative tool used to express stance, manage social relations, and
construct digital identities. Four major themes emerged from the data: (1) Solidarity and Group
Alignment, (2) Humor and Irony, (3) Politeness and Facework, and (4) Emphatic and Evaluative
Force. Platform-specific patterns were also observed.
4.1. Solidarity and Group Alignment
Across both platforms, slang was frequently used to signal in-group membership and establish
rapport. Expressions such as
bruh
,
fam
,
no cap
, and
based
were employed to affirm shared
understanding or cultural references.
On Reddit, especially in subreddits like r/teenagers or r/memes, slang marked
generational identity and participation in internet culture. For example:
“That take is so based, not even gonna lie.”
On Twitter, slang often functioned as a marker of communal irony or social commentary,
particularly in replies and quote tweets:
“He said he’d fix it and then dipped . Classic.”
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
494
In both cases, slang served to align the speaker with the audience, creating a sense of intimacy or
shared worldview.
4.2. Humor and Irony
A large number of slang expressions were used for comic effect or self-deprecating humor,
especially when addressing controversial or awkward topics.
Twitter users favored compact, meme-driven slang (
ratio
,
L
,
mid
,
delulu
) to convey
layered irony or mockery. For example:
“Bro tried to flex his playlist and got cooked. L take fr.”
Reddit comments used longer turns but similarly relied on slang to create humorous
distance:
“That’s peak clownery, my guy. Peak.”
In both cases, slang operated pragmatically to soften criticism, inject playfulness, or perform
irony, often relying on shared internet literacy.
4.3. Politeness and Facework
Though slang is often perceived as informal or abrasive, it was strategically used to mitigate
face-threatening acts, particularly criticism or disagreement.
In Reddit debates, users employed slang to cushion disagreement:
“Hot take, but I lowkey agree with the villain here.”
On Twitter, slang offered a way to engage disagreement without direct confrontation, e.g.:
“Might be an unpopular opinion but that movie was kinda sus ngl.”
Such usage reflects a shift from conventional politeness markers to community-specific facework
strategies embedded in slang.
4.4. Emphatic and Evaluative Force
Slang terms were often used to intensify emotional expression or signal strong evaluation.
Reddit users used terms like
cringe
,
fire
,
legit
, and
simp
to frame opinions:
“She’s legit carrying the whole show, not even mad.”
Twitter users amplified reactions using emojis and slang in tandem:
“That performance was straight . No notes.”
These choices reflect a pragmatic use of slang to heighten expressivity, often replacing or
enhancing traditional adverbs and adjectives.
4.5. Platform-Specific Patterns
While thematic overlap existed, some platform-specific tendencies emerged:
Twitter users relied more on brevity, stylization, and trending slang, often embedding
expressions within visual or meme-based formats.
Reddit featured more elaborated discourse, where slang was embedded in extended
arguments, personal anecdotes, or storytelling.
This suggests that platform architecture and community norms influence not only the lexical
items chosen but their pragmatic deployment.
5. Discussion
The findings of this study provide compelling evidence that slang in online discourse operates
not merely as informal vocabulary but as a powerful pragmatic resource. Drawing on samples
from Twitter and Reddit, the analysis revealed that slang expressions perform a range of context-
dependent functions: they align users socially, index stances, mitigate threats to face, and
enhance expressive force. These findings support and extend previous work on the role of
informal language in digital environments (Locher & Graham, 2010; Dynel, 2016), while
highlighting the specific pragmatic versatility of slang within platform-mediated communication.
5.1. Slang as a Marker of Social Alignment
Consistent with sociolinguistic accounts of slang as a tool for group identity (Eckert, 2000;
Bucholtz, 2009), this study found that users on both Reddit and Twitter deployed slang to
express solidarity, cultural belonging, and generational identity. However, going beyond lexical
tagging, the current analysis shows how these expressions function at the illocutionary level to
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
495
perform acts of agreement, affirmation, or bonding. Terms like
based
or
no cap
do more than
reference shared knowledge—they construct a relationship between speaker and audience, often
with subtle indexical meanings that depend on discourse context.
5.2. Humor and the Strategic Use of Irony
Slang was frequently embedded in humorous or ironic exchanges, especially on Twitter. This
aligns with previous research suggesting that humor and affect are central to informal digital
communication (Dynel, 2016; Bou-Franch et al., 2019). What this study adds is a pragmatic
account of how slang enables speakers to perform indirect speech acts, such as critique or
mockery, while preserving politeness or plausible deniability. The widespread use of terms like
delulu
or
L
illustrates how implicature and community inferences are leveraged for humor. This
supports Gricean analyses of flouted maxims as productive, rather than disruptive,
communicative strategies in digital discourse (Grice, 1975).
5.3. Politeness, Facework, and Slang
Unexpectedly, the findings revealed that slang was also used to negotiate politeness, particularly
in Reddit discussions. While not traditionally associated with face-sensitive language, slang here
served as a softening mechanism, reducing the threat of disagreement or dissent. For example,
the use of
lowkey
or
hot take
prefaces allowed users to present controversial views without direct
confrontation. This echoes Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory of facework, suggesting that in
digital discourse, community norms and platform affordances shape how indirectness and
mitigation are expressed—sometimes through non-traditional linguistic resources like slang.
5.4. Expressivity and Emphatic Functions
Another consistent pattern was the use of slang to intensify emotional or evaluative meaning.
Users employed slang terms as a substitute for traditional adverbs or adjectives to express
approval, disdain, or intensity. This finding reinforces previous observations that online language
often emphasizes amplification and affective force (Zappavigna, 2018). From a pragmatic
perspective, this reflects a strategic manipulation of relevance (Sperber & Wilson, 1986), where
users maximize communicative impact using minimal, culturally-loaded lexical items.
5.5. Platform-Specific Variation
While thematic patterns were consistent across Twitter and Reddit, their form and frequency
varied. Twitter posts, shaped by character limits and a culture of rapid interaction, relied heavily
on concise, trend-sensitive slang and visual-emotional layering (e.g., emojis). Reddit discourse,
in contrast, allowed for more elaborated turns and narrative structure, with slang embedded in
storytelling and argumentation. This supports Androutsopoulos’ (2014) claim that platform
affordances significantly influence not just language form, but language function.
5.6. Revisiting the Research Questions
This study set out to explore the pragmatic functions of slang on internet platforms and how
platform norms shape its usage. The data reveal that slang serves multiple pragmatic roles—far
beyond mere lexical novelty—and that these roles are conditioned by both contextual cues and
platform dynamics. These findings advance our understanding of how users co-construct
meaning through informal language, while highlighting the adaptability of slang to diverse
communicative needs.
6. Conclusion
This study set out to explore the pragmatic dimensions of slang in modern English as used on
two major internet platforms: Twitter and Reddit. By applying frameworks from pragmatic
theory to naturally occurring digital discourse, the research demonstrated that slang is far more
than casual or playful language; it is a strategically employed communicative tool used to
achieve a variety of interpersonal and rhetorical goals.
The analysis revealed that slang serves to align speakers socially, express humor and irony,
negotiate politeness, and amplify emotional meaning. These pragmatic functions were context-
dependent and often tailored to the affordances and norms of each platform. Twitter favored
brevity, stylization, and viral resonance, while Reddit encouraged extended discourse and more
subtle forms of alignment and facework.
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
496
In doing so, the study fills a notable gap in existing research, which has largely focused on
the semantic or sociolinguistic dimensions of slang. By foregrounding the functional and
interactional roles slang plays in digital communication, this study contributes to a more nuanced
understanding of how informal language evolves and adapts within online communities.
As digital communication continues to shape language use in real time, slang will remain a
key site for the negotiation of identity, humor, power, and group belonging. Future research
could expand this inquiry by incorporating additional platforms (e.g., Instagram, Discord),
longitudinal data, or user-centered perspectives through interviews or ethnographic observation.
Furthermore, there is potential to explore how slang functions across different cultural or
linguistic communities in online settings.
Ultimately, this study underscores the value of integrating pragmatic theory with digital
discourse analysis to capture the rich, socially embedded ways that language functions in
contemporary communication.
7. Implications of the study
The findings of this study offer several important implications for both linguistic scholarship and
digital communication practices. From a theoretical standpoint, the analysis highlights the need
for pragmatic models to more fully account for informal, community-driven language use in
digital contexts. Slang expressions, as demonstrated in this study, function as meaningful
pragmatic tools—shaping speech acts, managing face, and expressing alignment or irony within
online discourse. This calls for a more dynamic and context-sensitive understanding of
pragmatics that reflects the realities of internet-mediated interaction. Pedagogically, the study
has relevance for digital literacy education, where greater awareness of slang's communicative
functions can help learners and educators decode online texts with more nuance. Rather than
treating slang as peripheral or problematic, language instruction can incorporate its social and
rhetorical roles as part of authentic communication strategies. Additionally, the findings have
implications for social media moderation and community management. Recognizing that slang is
often used to maintain rapport, express solidarity, or soften criticism suggests that automated or
blanket censorship policies may misinterpret user intent. Moderation strategies should consider
the pragmatic function of slang before labeling it as disruptive or offensive. Finally, this study
contributes to the growing div of research that connects academic inquiry with real-time
linguistic evolution. By examining naturally occurring data from online platforms, it underscores
the importance of treating slang not merely as cultural ephemera but as a legitimate subject of
linguistic and social analysis.
8. Limitations of the Study
While this study offers valuable insights into the pragmatic functions of slang in digital discourse,
several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the scope of the analysis was limited to two
platforms—Twitter and Reddit—which, although rich in informal language, do not fully
represent the diversity of digital communication environments. Other platforms such as
Instagram, Discord, or TikTok may foster different linguistic norms, modes of expression, and
user demographics, potentially leading to alternative uses and interpretations of slang. Second,
the data were restricted to English-language posts within a specific timeframe (2023–2025),
primarily reflecting Western online culture. As slang is both temporally and culturally situated,
these findings may not be generalizable to other linguistic communities or historical moments.
Third, the analysis was based solely on textual data, without access to users’ intentions or
audience perceptions. As such, interpretations of pragmatic function are inferential, and may not
fully reflect how messages were intended or received. Furthermore, although coding was
grounded in established pragmatic theory and supported by intercoder checks, the inherently
interpretive nature of qualitative analysis introduces a degree of subjectivity. Finally, the use of
short, isolated samples may overlook the broader conversational or multimodal contexts in which
slang operates. These limitations suggest that future research could benefit from more diverse
data sources, cross-cultural comparisons, and user-centered methodologies to deepen our
understanding of slang as a complex and evolving pragmatic phenomenon.
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
497
9. Future Research
Building on the findings and limitations of this study, several directions for future research are
evident. One promising area involves expanding the platform scope to include additional social
media environments such as TikTok, Discord, or messaging applications, where slang is used in
more multimodal and interactive ways. Exploring how slang functions pragmatically in video
content, voice messages, or meme culture could provide deeper insights into the relationship
between linguistic form, visual context, and user intent. Additionally, a longitudinal or
diachronic approach could trace how specific slang expressions evolve over time—examining
shifts in their meaning, frequency, or pragmatic use as they move from subcultural to mainstream
contexts. Cross-cultural and multilingual research would also be valuable, particularly in
exploring how slang performs similar or divergent pragmatic functions across different linguistic
communities or in intercultural online interactions. Furthermore, incorporating user-centered
methods such as interviews, surveys, or digital ethnography could enrich the analysis by
capturing how speakers themselves understand and strategically use slang in real-world online
settings. Finally, reception-based studies could investigate how different audiences interpret
slang expressions, and whether factors such as age, platform familiarity, or cultural background
influence understanding. By pursuing these avenues, future studies can build a more
comprehensive and inclusive account of slang as a dynamic and socially embedded aspect of
digital pragmatics.
References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social
media.
Discourse, Context & Media, 4–5
, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006
Austin, J. L. (1962).
How to do things with words
. Oxford University Press.
Bou-Franch, P., García-Gómez, A., & Pardo, A. (2019). Analyzing humor in online interaction:
Multimodal and pragmatic perspectives.
Journal of Pragmatics, 141
, 78–89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.006
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987).
Politeness: Some universals in language usage
(Vol. 4).
Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, M. (2009). From stance to style: Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican
immigrant youth slang. In A. Jaffe (Ed.),
Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives
(pp. 146–170).
Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J. (2012).
The life of slang
. Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2011).
Internet linguistics: A student guide
. Routledge.
Dynel, M. (2016). “I has seen it all!”: Towards an integration of Internet memes into the study of
intertextuality,
humor and inter-discursivity.
Internet
Pragmatics,
1
(1), 29–52.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00004.dyn
Eble, C. (1996).
Slang and sociability: In-group language among college students
. University of
North Carolina Press.
Eckert, P. (2000).
Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity
in Belten High
. Blackwell.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),
Syntax and
semantics
(Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.
Language@Internet, 4
(1). http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761
Labov, W. (1972).
Sociolinguistic patterns
. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Locher, M. A., & Graham, S. L. (2010). Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates. In M. A.
Locher & S. L. Graham (Eds.),
Interpersonal pragmatics
(pp. 1–13). De Gruyter Mouton.
Matthews, P. H. (2007).
The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics
(2nd ed.). Oxford
University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),
Syntax and semantics
(Vol. 3, pp. 59–82). Academic Press.
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
498
Sharma, P., & Brookes, G. (2022). Memes, communities, and the pragmatics of belonging on
Reddit.
Discourse & Society, 33
(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211038877
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986).
Relevance: Communication and cognition
. Blackwell.
Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action.
Routledge
.
Zappavigna, M. (2018).
Searchable talk: Hashtags and social media metadiscourse
. Bloomsbury.
