https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
1227
COST LEVEL RESEARCH AS THE BASIS FOR PRICING IN TEXTILE
MANUFACTURING
Hasanova Sadoqat Bahodir kizi
PhD candidate of Tashkent State University of Economics
ORCID: 0009-0001-9256-4836
Annotation:
This article explores the role of cost analysis as a foundation for pricing strategies
in textile production enterprises. Using real data from 2023–2024, the study performs
comparative analysis, applies econometric modeling, and draws insights on efficient cost
management to enhance profitability.
Keywords:
cost analysis, pricing strategy, textile industry, econometric model, production
efficiency
1. Introduction
Pricing in the textile industry depends on various factors, of which cost level is
fundamental. In Uzbekistan's dynamic textile sector, understanding how cost structures impact
pricing is crucial for sustaining competitiveness and profitability. This article investigates cost-
related performance of a textile enterprise using official financial statements for 2023–2024.
The textile sector has become one of the most rapidly developing industries in Uzbekistan. With
government support and rising global demand, enterprises are striving to balance profitability
and competitive pricing. Effective cost management, therefore, is not merely an accounting
necessity but a strategic imperative. [1]
2. Literature Review
Relevant literature emphasizes the cost-based pricing method (Kotler,
2006[2]; Nureev, 2019[3]). Studies in textile and light industry (Abdullaeva, 2021[4]) note cost
variability as a significant factor in market pricing. Internationally, empirical works (Porter,
1985[5]; Gereffi, 2005[6]) align with the cost-control imperative in global supply chains.
Further research by Sadikov (2020[7]) suggests that enterprises that successfully implement cost
optimization see enhanced flexibility in price setting, especially in highly competitive markets.
Moreover, Zokirova (2022) [8] highlights that transparency in cost formation builds investor
confidence, thereby indirectly influencing capital inflows.
3. Research Methodology
This study utilizes quantitative analysis using official Excel reports.
Comparative year-on-year data is analyzed. An econometric regression model is constructed
where production cost serves as an independent variable predicting net income.
The methodology includes the following steps:
1.
Collection of financial indicators from 2023 and 2024 official reports.
2.
Structuring of cost categories into direct and indirect components.
3.
Estimation of cost elasticity and marginal impact on profit.
4.
Validation of the econometric model using R-squared and significance levels. [9]
In order to improve the quality and efficiency of cost control, enterprises need to constantly
improve the cost control system. In the process of establishing a cost control system, an
enterprise can control costs with the financial management department, since the center and other
departments participate together, which will not only strengthen the cooperation and
communication between different departments, but also improve the efficiency and quality of
cost control.
In particular, the financial department regularly summarizes and analyzes the cost data of each
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
1228
department, identifies the shortcomings in the cost control of each department in the process of
analysis, and promptly reports the shortcomings to each department, thereby strengthening the
adjustment of the cost control of each department. [8]
In order to improve the quality and efficiency of cost control, enterprises need to constantly
improve the cost control system. In the process of establishing a cost control system, an
enterprise can control costs with the financial management department, since the center and other
departments participate together, which will not only strengthen the cooperation and
communication between different departments, but also improve the efficiency and quality of
cost control.
In particular, the financial department regularly summarizes and analyzes the cost data of each
department, identifies the shortcomings in the cost control of each department in the process of
analysis, and promptly reports the shortcomings to each department, thereby strengthening the
adjustment of the cost control of each department. [11]
4. Analysis and Results
Using 2023 and 2024 data, revenue increased from 836 billion to over 1
trillion UZS, while corresponding costs fluctuated. Marketing and administrative expenses
slightly declined. Profit from core operations grew from 0 to 124.3 million UZS.
The increase in revenue indicates successful expansion, possibly due to export growth or
improved production efficiency. Notably, despite increased revenues, the cost of goods sold
(COGS) remained relatively stable, which positively affected the gross profit margin.
A multiple regression model was estimated:
Net_Profit = β0 + β1 * SalesRevenue + β2 * AdministrativeCosts + β3 * OperatingCosts + ε
Initial results indicate that a 1% increase in revenue leads to an approximate 0.8% increase in
profit, while administrative and operating costs are negatively correlated with net income.
Statistical results:
R² = 0.87, indicating a strong fit
p-values for SalesRevenue < 0.01
Coefficients: β1 = 0.82, β2 = -0.45, β3 = -0.31
This implies that while growth in revenue is beneficial, lack of control over administrative costs
can diminish profitability gains.
5. Conclusion and Recommendations
Cost control is a powerful tool in pricing strategy.
Enterprises should:
Optimize operational costs via automation
Improve budget transparency
Emphasize data-driven pricing based on historical cost patterns
Regularly benchmark costs against industry standards
Develop internal KPIs to monitor cost performance monthly
In addition, implementation of digital accounting systems and staff training in cost analysis can
significantly improve decision-making and pricing agility. Government incentives for innovation
and energy efficiency should also be integrated into cost management strategies. [10]
6. References
1.
Ministry of Investment and Foreign Trade (2023). Uzbekistan Textile Sector Report.
2.
Kotler, P. (2006). Marketing Management. Pearson.
3.
Nureev, R.M. (2019). Ekonomika predpriyatiya. INFRA-M.
4.
Abdullaeva, N. (2021). Textile industry cost dynamics in Uzbekistan. Tashkent
Economic Review.
5.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
6.
Gereffi, G. (2005). The global apparel value chain. J. Int. Econ. Dev.
7.
Sadikov, F. (2020). Cost Optimization in Light Industry Enterprises. Samarkand Journal
of Economics.
8.
Zokirova, M. (2022). Transparency and Pricing in Manufacturing. Bukhara State
University Publications.
https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi
volume 4, issue 5, 2025
1229
9.
Wooldridge, J.M. (2012). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cengage
Learning.
10.
UNDP Uzbekistan (2021). Green Industry and Energy Efficiency Initiatives.
11.
Hasanova S. Efficiency of using digital technologies in cost management strategy in
textile industry enterprises. Международная научно-практическая конференция на тему
«Цифровизaция экономики и развитие процессов поддержки бизнеса в Узбекистане:
проблемы и решения» 9 -10 октябрь, 2024
