МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 11.79/2023
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 2, Выпуск 9, 31 Октябрь
389
https://universalpublishings.com
POLITENESS IN GENDER AND LANGUAGE USAGE
Shodieva Maftunabonu Adizovna
Asia International University, English chair
Email: shodiyevamaftunabonuadizovna@oxu.uz
Abstract
The article delves into the differences, in politeness strategies between men
and women. How these variations affect the way they communicate with each other.
Politeness, in speech mirrors expectations and power dynamics shaped by gender
norms. Women typically employ cooperative language that highlights forming
connections whereas men usually opt for more direct communication centered
around tasks. Nevertheless these tendencies are not. Can change depending on
backgrounds, situational contexts and personal traits. Recognizing these distinctions
could enhance how people connect with each other and increase recognition of
prejudices, in communication.
Keywords: politeness, gendered communication, indirectness, discourse
strategies sociolinguistics, intersectionality.
Introduction
Social norms influencing communication include politeness levels and
societal expectations related to language use well as the subtleties of indirect
communication methods, in various social contexts, within the field of
sociolinguistics and the intersections of identity factors.
The way we use language is closely connected to the expectations and beliefs
society has about how men and women should behave in situations." Being using
language to show respect or avoid causing offense. Is an essential part of these
expectations." Researchers such, as Brown and Levinson (1987)" developed the
theory of politeness to explain how people try to avoid hurting others feelings or
social status by using different techniques depending on factors like gender." This
study explores these techniques. How they are shown differently between men and
women, in social settings."The results show that women often prefer using subtle
ways to be polite compared to men who tend to be more straightforward; however
these behaviors can differ basedon situational factors.The research suggests that it's
important to challenge stereotypes in order to promote communication strategies.
МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 11.79/2023
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 2, Выпуск 9, 31 Октябрь
390
https://universalpublishings.com
Men and women tend to use politeness strategies in ways based on norms and
expectations Women tend to lean towards using polite expressions like hedging
words ("maybe" or ", in my opinion") tag questions ("right?" or "don't you think?")
and subtle requests as a way to foster cooperation and maintain conversation
harmony On the contrary men often opt for assertive language and competitive tones
showcasing their independence and dominance, in social interactions
The publication named the American Journal of Philological Sciences is quite
interesting and informative.
Women tend to use speech acts as compared to men do, in communication
scenarios.Contrary to giving orders or commands like men typically do women may
opt for a subtler approach by phrasing their requests for instance saying "Could you
please close the window?" This method aims to lessen the burden placed upon the
listener and showcases a preference, for maintaining harmony (Brown & Levinson
1987). The crux here lies in the utilization of expressions where women employ
nuanced language in order to sidestep conflicts. According to Mills (2003) the
behaviors, in question are not innate but rather shaped by societys norms and
expectations that link femininity to nurturing and masculinity, to power and
resilience. Building upon this idea Holmes (1999 ) adds that women are often
pressured to speak while men are typically urged to convey dominance particularly
in work environments.
Mens Utilization of Politeness.
On the side of the coin males tend to utilize language to effectively and
confidently communicate information. They concentrate on accomplishing goals
during discussions resulting in communication styles that're often competitive or
task oriented. Although this direct approach may seem courteous it is commonly
viewed as a display of self reliance and assurance characteristics typically linked
with masculinity according to Mills ( 2003 ). Nevertheless men also exhibit
politeness in situations within hierarchical settings where showing respect to
superiors or clients is considered standard practice.
The correlation, between politeness and intersectionality is crucial in
comprehending language fully as various factors like race and social status intersect
МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 11.79/2023
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 2, Выпуск 9, 31 Октябрь
391
https://universalpublishings.com
with gender to shape how people demonstrate courtesy in contexts within society
and across cultures. Expectations around politeness can differ significantly among
backgrounds; some societies prioritize respect more than others do. Moreover
individuals in roles may not conform strictly to gender norms when it comes to
communication styles; they might employ assertiveness or deference based on the
situation, at hand.
We should be careful, with statements like these since situations can bring out
varied responses from people regardless of their gender – whether its a formal setting
or a casual interaction, across different cultures. Also worth noting is how these
tendencies change over time with advancements where gender rolesre no longer
rigid but more flexible and inclusive in todays world.
Traditional politeness norms are being tested by changes, in gender roles
where language expectations are concerned as society embraces inclusivity openly
and individuals feel less bound by stereotypes that dictate how they communicate
based on gender differences blur in communication styles. Men and women now
adjust their strategies for being polite depending on the circumstances they find
themselves in and are leaning towards approaches that're more adaptable and
situation specific according to Holmes (1999). Moreover as new gender identities
emerge beyond the female categories it becomes more complex to analyze politeness
using old frameworks which necessitates new research into politeness, within
various identities and contexts.
The idea of intersectionality highlights how gender intersects, with aspects of
identity such as race and social class when it comes to language use choices.
Different cultural backgrounds can impact what is considered behavior. May affect
how people show respect or assertiveness. Factors like a persons status and the
specific power dynamics in a situation can also play a role in shaping these patterns
of behavior which can sometimes defy beliefs, about gendered expressions of
politeness.
In summary
The way we speak politely reflects the norms and expectations tied to gender
roles in society today; women are often encouraged to communicate in a cooperative
manner while men tend to be more direct, in their approach. But these guidelines
МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 11.79/2023
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 2, Выпуск 9, 31 Октябрь
392
https://universalpublishings.com
aren't set in stone. Understanding and acknowledging these communication patterns
can foster an environment by encouraging people to question and push back against
stereotypes. Further studies could delve into how these communication styles
develop over time and vary across settings.
References
1.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in
Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
2.
Holmes, J. (1999). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London:
Longman.
3.
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
4.
Kaniyazova, A. B. (2024). Gender Differences in Language Use
and Politeness Strategies. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(4), 17-23.
5.
Shodieva,
M.
(2024).
SOCIOLINGUISTIC
APPROACHES:
UNDERSTANDING LANGUAGE IN SOCIAL CONTEXTS.
Modern Science and
Research
,
3
(1), 69-75.
6.
Shodiyeva,
M.
(2023).
SOCIOLINGUISTICS
AND
IDENTIFICATION IN THE CLASSROOM.
Modern Science and Research
,
2
(12),
494-498.
7.
Adizovna, S. M. (2023). Code-Switching and Multilingualism:
Exploring the Dynamics of Language use in Uzbekistan.
American Journal of
Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education (2993-2769)
,
1
(9), 549-553.
8.
Shodieva, M. (2023). UNDERSTANDING SOCIOLINGUISTIC
APPROACH IN THE ENGLISH CLASSROOM.
Modern Science and
Research
,
2
(10), 64-68.
9.
Maftunabonu,
S.
(2023).
THE
DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN
TRADITIONAL AND MODERN TEACHING METHODS.
Modern Science and
Research
,
2
(10), 829-831.
10.
Shodieva, M. (2023). MASTERING ENGLISH IN A MONTH:
EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR RAPID PROGRESS. In
Academic International
Conference on Multi-Disciplinary Studies and Education
(Vol. 1, No. 19, pp. 83-
87).
11.
Shodieva, M. (2023). DEVELOPING SUMMARY WRITING SKILL
IN ACADEMIC WRITING.
Modern Science and Research
,
2
(9), 140-144.
МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 11.79/2023
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 2, Выпуск 9, 31 Октябрь
393
https://universalpublishings.com
12.
Surat, F. N. . (2024). DIALOGUE IN THE ANIMATED SERIES
"KUNG FU PANDA.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, ETHICS AND VALUE
,
3
(4),
202–205.
Retrieved
from
https://jeev.innovascience.uz/index.php/jeev/article/view/624
13.
Fayzullayeva, N. (2024). FEEL THE FREEDOM IN THE WORKS OF
WALT WHITMAN. MODERN SCIENCE AND RESEARCH, 3(3), 330–335.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10814469
14.
Fayzullayeva, N. (2024). WALT WHITMAN WORD ABOUT "A
CELEBRATION OF THE HUMAN SPIRIT IN POETRY". MODERN SCIENCE
AND RESEARCH, 3(3), 336–341.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10814566
15.
Fayzullayeva, N. (2024). WALT WHITMAN AND HIS POEM
ABOUT AMERICA.
Modern Science and Research
,
3
(1), 35–39. Retrieved from
https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/28918
16.
Fayzullayeva, N. (2024). "AMERICAN DREAM" IN WALT
WITHMAN’S POEMS.
Modern Science and Research
,
3
(1), 220–224. Retrieved
https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/27940
17.
Sur’at qizi Fayzullayeva, N., & Kilicheva, M. R. (2022). UOLT
UILTMAN NASRIDA “AMERIKA ORZUSI” KONSEPTI.
INTERNATIONAL
СONFERENCE ON LEARNING AND TEACHING
,
1
(8), 574-576.
18.
Fayzullayeva, N. (2023). THE IMPROVING OF LISTENING
SKILL.
Modern Science and Research
,
2
(10), 272–276. Retrieved from
https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/25086
19.
Fayzullayeva, N. (2023). THE CONCEPT OF THE AMERICAN
DREAM AND WALT WHITMAN.
Solution of social problems in management and
economy
,
2
(11), 137-142.
20.
Fayzullayeva, N. (2023). THE ROLE OF THE AMERICAN DREAM
IN UOLT WILTMAN’S POEMS.
Modern Science and Research
,
2
(10), 714–718.
https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/24676
21.
Fayzullayeva, N. (2023). USAGE OF THE FLORA IN THE EARLY
MODERN ENGLISH POETRY. Modern Science and Research, 2(9), 36–39.
Retrieved from
https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/24078
