This article presents a systematic literature review of studies that have used data mining and learning analytics techniques to predict student performance. The review covers a period of 10 years (2011-2021) and examines a total of 50 papers from various sources. The results show that data mining and learning analytics techniques have been widely used to predict student performance in different educational contexts, including K-12, higher education, and online learning. The most commonly used data mining and learning analytics techniques were decision trees, logistic regression, neural networks, and support vector machines. The review identifies the main challenges and limitations of using data mining and learning analytics techniques for predicting student performance, including issues related to data quality, feature selection, model validation, and ethical considerations. The article concludes with recommendations for future research in this area.
Daniel, B. Big data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2015, 46, 904–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zohair, L.M.A. Prediction of student’s performance by modelling small dataset size. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2019, 16, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hellas, A.; Ihantola, P.; Petersen, A.; Ajanovski, V.V.; Gutica, M.; Hynninen, T.; Knutas, A.; Leinonen, J.; Messom, C.; Liao, S.N. Predicting academic performance: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Larnaca, Cyprus, 2–4 July 2018; pp. 175–199. [Google Scholar]
Baradwaj, B.K.; Pal, S. Mining educational data to analyze students’ performance. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2012, 2, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhang, L.; Li, K.F. Education analytics: Challenges and approaches. In Proceedings of the 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), Krakow, Poland, 16–18 May 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Daud, A.; Aljohani, N.R.; Abbasi, R.A.; Lytras, M.D.; Abbas, F.; Alowibdi, J.S. Predicting student performance using advanced learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, Perth, Australia, 3–7 April 2017; pp. 415–421. [Google Scholar]
Macayan, J.V. Implementing outcome-based education (OBE) framework: Implications for assessment of students’ performance. Educ. Meas. Eval. Rev. 2017, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
Yassine, S.; Kadry, S.; Sicilia, M.A. A framework for learning analytics in moodle for assessing course outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Abu Dhabi, UAE, 10–13 April 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 261–266. [Google Scholar]
Rajak, A.; Shrivastava, A.K.; Shrivastava, D.P. Automating outcome based education for the attainment of course and program outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2018 Fifth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT), Dubai, UAE, 28–29 November 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 373–376. [Google Scholar]
Kitchenham, B.; Charters, S. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering; EBSE: Keele, UK, 2007; pp. 1–65. [Google Scholar]
Okoli, C.; Schabram, K. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Ssrn Eletronic J. 2010, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Kaliannan, M.; Chandran, S.D. Empowering students through outcome-based education (OBE). Res. Educ. 2012, 87, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Premalatha, K. Course and program outcomes assessment methods in outcome-based education: A review. J. Educ. 2019, 199, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kanmani, B.; Babu, K.M. Leveraging technology in outcome-based education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education, New Delhi, India, 5–8 January 2015; Natarajan, R., Ed.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 415–421. [Google Scholar]
Namoun, A.; Taleb, A.; Benaida, M. An expert comparison of accreditation support tools for the undergraduate computing programs. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (IJACSA) 2018, 9, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mahajan, M.; Singh, M.K.S. Importance and benefits of learning outcomes. IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2017, 22, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Namoun, A.; Taleb, A.; Al-Shargabi, M.; Benaida, M. A learning outcome inspired survey instrument for assessing the quality of continuous improvement cycle. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. (IJICTE) 2019, 15, 108–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Taleb, A.; Namoun, A.; Benaida, M. A holistic quality assurance framework to acquire national and international. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2019, 14, 6685–6698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Singh, R.; Sarkar, S. Teaching Quality Counts: How Student Outcomes Relate to Quality of Teaching in Private and Public Schools in India; Young Lives: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 1–48. [Google Scholar]
Philip, K.; Lee, A. Online public health education for low and middle-income countries: Factors influencing successful student outcomes. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (IJET) 2011, 6, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]