LISTENING FOR DISCOURSE MARKERS AND CONNECTORS

Annotasiya

In this article, the main aim of the author is explaining the role of discourse markers (DM) and connectors in linguistics. Besides that, there is stated the significant role the abovementioned tools play in listening comprehension these days.

Manba turi: Konferentsiyalar
Yildan beri qamrab olingan yillar 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Chiqarish:
41-44
191

Кўчирилди

Кўчирилганлиги хақида маълумот йук.
Ulashish
Teshaboyeva, N., & Quvonova , M. (2024). LISTENING FOR DISCOURSE MARKERS AND CONNECTORS. Молодые ученые, 2(36), 41–44. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/yosc/article/view/62237
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Annotasiya

In this article, the main aim of the author is explaining the role of discourse markers (DM) and connectors in linguistics. Besides that, there is stated the significant role the abovementioned tools play in listening comprehension these days.


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

41

LISTENING FOR DISCOURSE MARKERS AND CONNECTORS

Teshaboyeva Nafisa Zubaydulla qizi

Jizzakh Branch of the National

University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulug'bek

The faculty of Psychology, department of Foreign languages

Phylology and foreign languages

Quvonova Mohichehra

Student of group 102-23

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14498804

Annotation.

In this article, the main aim of the author is explaining the role of discourse

markers (DM) and connectors in linguistics. Besides that, there is stated the significant role
the abovementioned tools play in listening comprehension these days.

Key words:

listening comprehension, information, summarizing, contrasting,

connectors, phrases, conversation.

Аннотация

. В данной статье основной целью автора является объяснение роли

дискурсивных маркеров (ДМ) и коннекторов в лингвистике. Кроме того, указывается
на важную роль, которую вышеупомянутые инструменты играют в аудировании в
наши дни.

Ключевые слова:

аудирование, информация, резюмирование, сопоставление,

коннекторы, фразы, разговор.


INTRODUCTION

Connectors: because, however, therefore, moreover, although, as a result, consequently.

Introducing a new idea: moving on, let’s talk about, on to. Providing examples: for instance,
such as, for example. Showing contrast: but, yet, on the other hand. Adding information:
furthermore, in addition, also. Expressing cause and effect: since, because, thus. Summarizing:
to sum up, in conclusion, overall. Indicating sequence: first, next, finally, then.

In effective communication, especially in academic, professional, or even casual

conversations, discourse markers and connectors play a crucial role in organizing thoughts,
signaling transitions, and indicating relationships between ideas. For learners a new language
or even native speakers looking to improve their comprehension, being able to identify and
understand these markers is essential for better listening skills.

MAIN BODY

What Are Discourse Markers and Connectors?
Discourse markers are words or phrases that guide the listener through the speaker's

train of thought. They help in structuring spoken or written language, indicating shifts in
conversation, introducing new ideas, providing emphasis, or showing the speaker’s attitude.
Common examples include words like well, so, anyway, actually, and you know.

Connectors, on the other hand, are specific words or phrases used to link ideas
together, showing relationships such as cause and effect, comparison, contrast, or

sequence. Examples include words like because, however, therefore, moreover, and although.
They are vital in signaling the logical flow of an argument or discussion.

Why Listen for Discourse Markers and Connectors?


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

42

When listening to someone speak, recognizing these elements can significantly improve

your understanding of the conversation. Here is why:

Organizing Information: Discourse markers often signal shifts in topics or ideas.

Recognizing these cues helps listeners understand when a speaker is moving from one point
to another, making the information easier to follow.

Clarifying Relationships Between Ideas: Connectors indicate how ideas are related. For

instance, “because” signals a reason or cause, “but” indicates contrast, and “therefore”
suggests a conclusion or result. Being aware of these links enhances comprehension of the
argument or narrative.

Predicting What Comes Next: Certain discourse markers give clues about what the

speaker is about to do. For instance, “to sum up” indicates a conclusion, while “on the other
hand” signals a comparison. Recognizing these markers helps listeners anticipate the
speaker’s next move and adjust their focus accordingly.

Understanding the Speaker's Attitude or Intention: Some discourse markers give hints

about the speaker’s feelings or attitudes. For example, “well” can signal hesitation, and
“actually” might indicate a correction or contrast to something previously said. By paying
attention to these markers, listeners can better understand the speaker’s intentions or
emotions.

Common Discourse Markers and Connectors in Listening and here are some examples of

discourse markers and connectors to listen for:

Introducing a new idea: Now, so, okay, moving on to...

Providing examples: For instance, such as, for example...

Showing contrast: However, on the other hand, although, but...

Adding information: Moreover, furthermore, in addition...

Expressing cause and effect: Because, as a result, therefore, consequently...

Summarizing: In conclusion, to sum up, overall...

Indicating sequence: First, next, finally, then...

Practical Tips for Improving Listening Skills with Discourse Markers

Practice Active Listening: Pay close attention to how speakers organize their speech.

Make mental notes or even jot down discourse markers as you hear them. This will help you
follow the structure of the conversation.

Listen to a Variety of Sources: Expose yourself to different types of audio materials, such

as

podcasts

lectures

interviews

conversations.

Television or radio talk shows
The more diverse the material, the more likely you will encounter a range of
discourse markers and connectors in various contexts.
Use Transcripts: If you are practicing with recorded materials, follow along with a

transcript. This will help you visually identify the markers as they are used in speech, making
it easier to recognize them in future listening situations.


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

43

Anticipate the Next Idea: Once you become familiar with common discourse markers

and connectors, use them to predict what is coming next in the conversation. For example, if
you hear “on the other hand”, you can expect the speaker to contrast what was just said with a
new idea.

Reflect on What You Heard: After listening to a conversation or speech, take time to

think about how the speaker organized their ideas. What discourse markers did they use?
How did those help clarify the relationships between ideas?

CONCLUSION

Listening for discourse markers and connectors is a powerful tool for improving

comprehension in both everyday conversations and more formal listening situations. By
recognizing these linguistic cues, you can follow conversations more easily, understand the
logical flow of ideas, and even predict what a speaker is about to say. Over time, this will
enhance not only your listening skills but also your ability to engage in more meaningful,
organized communication. Not only in listening to communicate, but also while listening to
practise such tools are of great significance to find and guess correct answers beforehand.
Therefore, it is considered to be rather critical to learn as much as possible about discourse
markers and connectors to accelerate and ease Language Acquisition in this era.

References:

1.

Teshaboyeva, N. (2023). THE MODERN INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING

FOREIGN LANGUAGES. Журнал иностранных языков и лингвистики, 5(5).
2.

Hansen, M. (1997). Alors and donc in spoken French: a reanalysis. Journal of Pragmatics,

28, 153-187.
3.

Hellermann, J. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of

beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 1,157-179.
4.

Jucker, A., & Y. Ziv. (1998). Discourse Markers: Description and Theory. Amsterdam:

John Benjamins.
5.

Knott, A., & T. Sanders. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their

linguistic markers: an exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 135-175.
6.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford:

Pergamon Press.
7.

Macaulay, R. (2002). You know, it depends. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 749-767.

8.

Norrick, N. R. (2002). Discourse markers in oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 35,

849-878.
9.

O’Malley, J. M., & A. U. Chamot. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language

Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.

Redeker, G. (1991). Linguistics markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29, 1139-

1172
11.

Risselada, R., & W. Spooren. (1998). Introduction: Discourse markers and coherence

relation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 131-133. 8
12.

Rost, M. (1990). Listening in Language Learning. New York: Longman.

13.

Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern

Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221.
14.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

44

15.

Sperber, D., & D. Wilson, (2001) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Beijing:

Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
16.

Taboada, M. (2006). Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal

of Pragmatics, 38, 567-592.
17.

Ахmеdоvа S. R. и др. Mаsоfаviy tа’lim vа uning hоrijiy tillаrni o’qitishdаgi o’rni

//Science and Education. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 10. – С. 608-612.
18.

Ахmedova, S. R. (2021). Chet tillarni o’rganish va undagi metodlarning ahamiyati.

Science and Education

,

2

(11), 1076-1080.

19.

Ахmedova, S. R. (2021). Ilova elementlarining strukturaviy tahlilini o’rganish.

Science

and Education

,

2

(12), 583-587.

20.

Ахмедова, С. Р. (2022). Иловали унсурларининг иккинчи даражали бўлаклар

формасида ифодаланиб келиши.

Science and Education

,

3

(3), 814-817.

21.

Akhmedova, S. (2022). STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF APPLIED ELEMENTS IN

THE GERMAN LANGUAGE.

Science and innovation

,

1

(B5), 94-97.

22.

Ахмедова, С. Р. (2022). Эга шаклида ифодаланган мураккаб тузилишли иловали

элементларнинг таҳлилини ўрганиш.

Science and Education

,

3

(4), 1963-1966.

23.

Akhmedova

Sevara

Rakhmankulovna.

(2022).

NEMIS

TILIDA

ILOVALI

ELEMENTLARINING SEMANTIK O’ZIGA XOSLIKLARI.

International Journal of Contemporary

Scientific and Technical Research

,

1

(2), 481–485.Nafisa, T. (2023, December). Secondary ways

of word formation. In " Conference on Universal Science Research 2023" (Vol. 1, No. 12, pp.
109-112).
24.

Nafisa, T. (2023). VOWELS AND THEIR MODIFACATIONS. Новости образования:

исследование в XXI веке, 2(16), 298-305.
25.

Nafisa, T. (2023, December). Secondary ways of word formation. In " Conference on

Universal Science Research 2023" (Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 109-112).
26.

Nafisa, T. (2023). THE EDUCATION SYSTEM OF THE USA: PRESCHOOL EDUCATION,

SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION, SCHOOL FORMS. The Role of Exact Sciences in the
Era of Modern Development, 1(6), 53-57.
27.

Qizi, T. N. Z., & Umedovich, M. Y. (2023). AMERICAN-BASED PRONUNCIATION

STANDARDS OF ENGLISH. Scientific Impulse, 2(15), 563-567.
28.

Nafisa, T. (2023, December). Word Formation: Compounding. In " Conference on

Universal Science Research 2023" (Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 113-115).

Bibliografik manbalar

Teshaboyeva, N. (2023). THE MODERN INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES. Журнал иностранных языков и лингвистики, 5(5).

Hansen, M. (1997). Alors and donc in spoken French: a reanalysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 153-187.

Hellermann, J. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 1,157-179.

Jucker, A., & Y. Ziv. (1998). Discourse Markers: Description and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Knott, A., & T. Sanders. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: an exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 135-175.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Macaulay, R. (2002). You know, it depends. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 749-767.

Norrick, N. R. (2002). Discourse markers in oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 849-878.

O’Malley, J. M., & A. U. Chamot. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Redeker, G. (1991). Linguistics markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29, 1139-1172

Risselada, R., & W. Spooren. (1998). Introduction: Discourse markers and coherence relation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 131-133. 8

Rost, M. (1990). Listening in Language Learning. New York: Longman.

Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sperber, D., & D. Wilson, (2001) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Taboada, M. (2006). Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 567-592.

Ахmеdоvа S. R. и др. Mаsоfаviy tа’lim vа uning hоrijiy tillаrni o’qitishdаgi o’rni //Science and Education. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 10. – С. 608-612.

Ахmedova, S. R. (2021). Chet tillarni o’rganish va undagi metodlarning ahamiyati. Science and Education, 2(11), 1076-1080.

Ахmedova, S. R. (2021). Ilova elementlarining strukturaviy tahlilini o’rganish. Science and Education, 2(12), 583-587.

Ахмедова, С. Р. (2022). Иловали унсурларининг иккинчи даражали бўлаклар формасида ифодаланиб келиши. Science and Education, 3(3), 814-817.

Akhmedova, S. (2022). STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF APPLIED ELEMENTS IN THE GERMAN LANGUAGE. Science and innovation, 1(B5), 94-97.

Ахмедова, С. Р. (2022). Эга шаклида ифодаланган мураккаб тузилишли иловали элементларнинг таҳлилини ўрганиш. Science and Education, 3(4), 1963-1966.

Akhmedova Sevara Rakhmankulovna. (2022). NEMIS TILIDA ILOVALI ELEMENTLARINING SEMANTIK O’ZIGA XOSLIKLARI. International Journal of Contemporary Scientific and Technical Research, 1(2), 481–485.Nafisa, T. (2023, December). Secondary ways of word formation. In " Conference on Universal Science Research 2023" (Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 109-112).

Nafisa, T. (2023). VOWELS AND THEIR MODIFACATIONS. Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке, 2(16), 298-305.

Nafisa, T. (2023, December). Secondary ways of word formation. In " Conference on Universal Science Research 2023" (Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 109-112).

Nafisa, T. (2023). THE EDUCATION SYSTEM OF THE USA: PRESCHOOL EDUCATION, SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION, SCHOOL FORMS. The Role of Exact Sciences in the Era of Modern Development, 1(6), 53-57.

Qizi, T. N. Z., & Umedovich, M. Y. (2023). AMERICAN-BASED PRONUNCIATION STANDARDS OF ENGLISH. Scientific Impulse, 2(15), 563-567.

Nafisa, T. (2023, December). Word Formation: Compounding. In " Conference on Universal Science Research 2023" (Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 113-115).