Гемодинамические сдвиги у детей в период введения в наркоз

inLibrary
Google Scholar
Журнал:
Выпуск:
CC BY f
1226-1230
2
4
Поделиться
Агзамходжаев, Т., Юсупов, А., Исмаилова, М., Талипов, М., & Маматкулов, И. (2020). Гемодинамические сдвиги у детей в период введения в наркоз. in Library, 20(4), 1226–1230. извлечено от https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/archive/article/view/19055
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Аннотация

Статья посвящена изучению гемодинамики у детей в период ввода в наркоз. Проведен анализ результатов исследования – 80 детей в возрасте от 3 до 14 лет подверглись лечебным процедурам по поводу заболеваний органов брюшной полости и аноректальной области. Результаты исследования показали, что комбинация севофлюрана и кетамина в малых дозах вызывает эффективное обезболивающее действие с выраженным вегетативно-стабилизирующим эффектом, обеспечивая стабильное течение следующих этапов анестезии и посленаркозного периода.


background image

1226

  

Medico-legal Update, October-December 2020, Vol. 20, No. 4

Hemodynamic Shifts in

Children During the Induction into Narcosis Period

Talat Agzamkhodjaev

1

, Anvar Yusupov

1

,

Makhfuza Ismailova

1

, Mamur Talipov

1

, Isfandiyor Mamatkulov

1

1

Associate Professor, Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Uzbekistan, Tashkent

Abstract

The article focuses on the study of hemodynamics of children during the period of induction into anesthesia.
The analysis of the study results has been carried out – 80 children aged 3 to 14 years undergone medical
procedures on diseases of abdominal cavity and anorectal area. The study results have shown that the

combination of sevoflurane and ketamine in small doses has caused an effective analgesic effect with a

significant vegetative stabilizing effect providing a stable course of the following stages of anesthesia and

postanesthetic period.

Keywords: Combined anesthesia, induction period, measurements of central hemodynamic, inhalation
anesthetics, fentanyl, ketamine.

Introduction

Induction narcosis is the most essential stage

of anesthesia. Mistakes and inaccuracies during the
induction narcosis

2

and its complications may become

the very reason for the chain of abnormities that entail
a negative outcome in the future

7

. It is known that

medicines applied during the induction period are
not neutral for the organism and might become the
reason for serious complications due to hard-hitting

medicamental effect of the components

9

of anesthesia

on cardiovascular system

6

. Induction period might be

accompanied by significant hemodynamic shifts

5

. The

most frequent complications of the anesthesia period of
children are the disorders of cardiac rhythm and central
hemodynamics

11

.

The purpose of the work is to study the impact of

various types of induction on the condition of central
hemodynamics during the surgery on abdominal cavity
and anorectal area of children

4

.

Materials and Method

The work is based on the analysis of the study

results – 80 children aged 3 to 14 years 80. The study
has been carried out with children who have undergone
surgery because of the diseases of abdominal cavity –

42 children (52,5%) and of anorectal area – 38 children
(47,5%).

A complete clinical examination has been held. For

the purpose of the objective evaluation of the condition
of cardiovascular system a method of echocardiography
with the analysis of end-diastolic (EDD) and end-
systolic (ESD) dimensions of the left ventricle, R-R
interval and ejection time was applied. The study has
been carried out using the echocardiograph “Sonoscape”
(China, regnumber cfda 20123231386) of patients
on the following stages: prior to surgery (initial), post
premedication and post-induction.

Premedication was aimed at eliminating anxiety,

preventing nausea and vomiting. Atropine sulfate at
a dose of 0.01 mg/kg, diphenhydramine - 0.1 mg/kg,
sibazon - 0.25 mg/kg and ketamine - 2.0 mg/kg div
weight were prescribed as a part of premedication.

Small doses of ketamine (1 mg/kg) and propofol

(1 mg/kg) were administered intravenously to patients

of the first group in 30-40 minutes post premedication

as well as inhalation of sevoflurane at a dose 2,0 – 3,0

vol%.

Before a skin incision, a fentanyl solution of 3 μg/

kg was injected intravenously. The maintenance dose


background image

Medico-legal Update, October-December 2020, Vol. 20, No. 4

  

1227

of sevoflurane was 1.5 vol%, the fentanyl dose was

2 μg/kg.

Patients of the second group were exposed to

inhalation of isoflurane at a dose 2,0 vol% and intravenous

doses of fentanyl of 5 μg/kg and droperidol of 0,4 mg/kg

div weight 30-40 minutes post-premedication.

The obtained data has been processed via the set of

auxiliary programs Statistica for Windows, Release 5,5
Stat Soft, Inc, with the calculation of arithmetic mean
value (M), the average error (m), all digital data has been

presented as M±m. The significance of differences was

assessed by Student’s criterion (t) with a known number

of observations (n). The differences were considered

significant at P <0.05.

Results

After the premedication patients of the first group

has shown an increase in the measurement of the heart

rate frequency (HRF) by 6% (Р<0,05), the tendency to

an increase in the measurement of the arterial pressure:
systolic arterial pressure (SAP) by 2,3%, diastolic
arterial pressure (DAP) by 2,9% (Table.1). During

the induction period, propofol and sevoflurane have

caused fast and smooth induction, a smooth sleep onset
within 30-60 seconds of patients has been registered.

While the study period, an insignificant decrease of the

heart rate frequency measurement by 4,08% has been
noticed compared with similar measurements of the
premedication stage. The systolic and diastolic arterial
pressure measurements were characterized by the
downward tendency respectively by 0,7% and 0,9%.

Table 1. Measurements of the HRF, SAP and DAP at the induction anesthesia period with the use of

ketamine, propofol and sevoflurane

Measurements

Study Stages

Initial

Premedication

Induction

HRF

108,25±7,46

114,75±8,40*

110,06±6,80

SAP

89±8,20

91,06±9,30

90,43±9,15

DAP

45±7,79

46,31±8,56

45,87±7,50

Sp O2

95,31±0,60

97,56±0,51*

98,25±0,68*

Note:

* Reliability of differences in measurements compared to the original (Р < 0,05).

Discussion

On a premedication stage patient of the second

group have shown an increase in the measurement of
HRF by 5,5%. SAP measurements - by 3,0%, DAP

measurements - by 1,7%. Isoflurane inhalation has

caused a slow induction and the solutions of fentanyle
and droperidol have been injected intravenously in this
connection. After the fentanyle injection, a respiratory
depression has been observed, an auxiliary ventilation
has been applied and a tracheal intubation has been
implemented after the administration of muscle relaxants.
Skin cover was warm and had a regular staining whilst
the oxygen saturation indicator increased by 3,9%.

HRF measurement increased by 2,0%, an insignificant

increase in the SAP by 1,2% and DAP by 0,2% compared
with similar measurements of the original period has
been observed (Table 2).

On the background of the administration of

medicines for induction – ketamine, propofol and

sevoflurane after the trachea intubation an insignificant

change in hemodynamics not negatively affecting a

hemodynamic system has been observed. Introduction
period of general combined anesthesia with the use of
small doses of has been characterized by smooth clinical
course.


background image

1228

  

Medico-legal Update, October-December 2020, Vol. 20, No. 4

Table 2. Measurements of the HRF, SAP and DAP at the induction anesthesia period of children with the

use of isoflurane, fentanyle and droperidol

Measurements

Study stages

Initial

Premedication

Induction

HRF

115±2,38

121,33+ 2,87*

118,93+ 3,93*

SAP

88,40±2,69

91,7±2,87

89,5±4,21

DAP

45,16±2,69

45,92±3,51

45,07±4,32

SpO2

95,38±0,58

97,44±0,6*

99,07±0,73

Note:

* Reliability of differences in measurements compared to the original (Р<0,05).

When conducting a study of the central

hemodynamics measurements of patients of the first

group, in the introduction period compared with the
similar measurements of the initial period, after the
trachea intubation the increase in HRF measurements

by 7,6%, CI by 18,5% (Р<0,05), some tendency to

the increase of SV measurement by 9,3% have been
observed. At the same time, a downward tendency to the
decrease in the measurements of EF by 5,6% and SPVR
by 8,2% has been noted (Table 3).

Table 3. Measurements of central hemodynamics during the anesthesia induction period of children with the

use of isoflurane, fentanyle and droperidol (n=40)

Measurements

Initial

Premedication

Induction

EF

70.49±0.85

68.28±1.03

66.55±0.96*

SV

24.59±1.61

22.9±1.31

26.88±1.63

HRF

97.8±2.21

107±2.11*

105.18±1.91*

SPVR

30.29±1.54

32.16±1.77

27.81±1.04**

CI

2.87±0.09

3.02±0.11

3.4±0.1***

Note:

* Reliability of differences in measurements compared to the original (Р < 0,05).

Table 4 represents the data on the study of central

hemodynamics during general anesthesia of children

with the use of isoflurane, fentanyle and droperidol.

The increase in the measurements of HRF and Specific

peripheral vascular resistance.

Table 4. Measurements of central hemodynamics during the anesthesia induction period of children with the

use of isoflurane, fentanyle and droperidol (n = 40)

Measurements

Initial

Premedication

Induction

EF

71.96±1.48

71.51±1.17

72.05±1.4

SV

24.87±1.54

23.56±1.31

23.67±1.35

HRF

96.48±2.07

109.15±2.2*

109.9±2.33*

SPVR

29.7±1.41

25.52±1.25*

26.59±1.42

CI

2.81±0.14

3.08±0.15

3.12±0.17

Note:

*Reliability of differences in measurements compared to the original (Р < 0,05).


background image

Medico-legal Update, October-December 2020, Vol. 20, No. 4

  

1229

In the introduction period of anesthesia after the

trachea intubation compared with the premedication
stage only a slight tendency to the measurement change
has been noted. In comparison with the initial period, only

HRF was subjected to a significant change and increased

by 13,9%. Only the SV and SPVR measurements had
a downward tendency by 4,8% and 10,5% respectively.
Subsequent laryngoscopy and intubation do not cause
such a pronounced hyperdynamic response as with
induction with ketamine and barbiturates. Hypotension
was prevented and eliminated by infusion loading.

The results of the existing study show that the

combination of sevoflurane with propofol and ketamine

in small doses has caused the effective analgesia with a

significant vegetative stabilizing effect associated with

central suppression of sympatic activity, and has ensured
a stable course of subsequent stages of anesthesia and
post-anesthesia period. Patients experienced a rapid
restoration of the preoperative level of neuropsychic
status after surgery.

Conclusions

1. Insignificant changes of the main measurements

of central hemodynamics are contingent to the
condition of patients during the introduction period,
the trachea intubation and the manipulations
taken. The vasodilating properties of propofol

and sevoflurane suring the introduction narcosis

determine a switch hypodynamic reaction of the
circulatory system.

2. The evaluation of the clinical course of the

introduction period and of the changes of the
main measurements of central hemodynamics
at conducting the two variants of the combined
anesthesia has shown smooth introduction into
narcosis and therefore an auxiliary stable course of
the subsequent anesthesia stages.

3. Applying small doses of ketamine and propofol

coupled with sevoflurane is an optimal method of

induction during traumatic and extensive surgery in
the abdominal cavity and anorectal area in children.

Ethical Clearance:

No ethical approval is needed.

Source of Funding:

Self

Conflict of Interest:

Nil

References

1.

Vasilkov V.G. MVN, KAF, YNG, ROP.
Antihypoxic antioxidants for the prevention of
perioperative hemodynamic disorders in elderly
patients with hip fracture [Antigipoksanti-

antioksidanti dlya profilaktiki perioperatsionnykh

narusheniy gemodinamiki u pozhilikh patsientov s
perelomom bedra]. Meditsinski alfavit. 2015; 2(9):
p. 23-9.

2.

Dyomin V.V. NVF, KMV, DAV, DDV.
Hemodynamics and heart rate variability in children
with congenital heart defects during anesthesia.
2018;: p. 57-58.

3.

Zabolotskikh I.B. VRV, TNV. Recruitment
maneuver in conditions of general anesthesia during
abdominal operations. Vestnik anestezioologii I
reanimatologii. 2016; 13(6).

4.

Pidgirniy Y.M. UZO, IAV. Multimodal anesthetic
management of a stumectomy operation. Meditsina
neotlozhnykh sostoyaniy. 2019; 4(99).

5.

Nasriev

S.A.

KEG,

MSS,

ABR,

PSK.

Hemodynamic effect of selective spinal anesthesia

during proctologic operations. Dostizheniya nauki I
obrazovaniya. 2018; 1(729).

6. Kulikov A.Y. KOV, LKM. The effect of xenon

anesthesia on hemodynamics: what we know by
2015. Anesteziologiya I reanimatologiya. 2015;
60(6).

7. Kuralov E.T. YAS, NHK. The effect of propofol

on hemodynamics in anti-glaucomatous surgery in
children. Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosi meditsini.
2016; 60(6)(5).

8.

Kachur S.V. SAO. Pathophysiological assessment
of stress response in the early postoperative period
in patients operated on for lung tumors under
multimodal anesthesia. Omskiy nauchniy vestnik.
2015; 2(144).

9.

Yusupov A.S. KAE, ELK. Hemodynamic changes
during pain relief in minor surgeries in children.
Sovremennaya meditsina: noviye podkhody I
aktualniye issledovaniya. 2019;: p. 11-17.

10. Terkawi

AS,

MTSHMJMHSTaMED.

“Ondansetron does not attenuate hemodynamic
changes in patients undergoing elective cesarean
delivery using subarachnoid anesthesia: a double-


background image

1230

  

Medico-legal Update, October-December 2020, Vol. 20, No. 4

blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.” 2015;:
p. 344-348.

11. Helwani MA AMAAKDCJHBKH. Effects of

regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes

after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective
propensity-matched cohort study. JBJS. 2015 Feb
4; 97(3): p. 186-93.

Библиографические ссылки

Vasilkov V.G. MVN, KAF, YNG, ROP. Antihypoxic antioxidants for the prevention of perioperative hemodynamic disorders in elderly patients with hip fracture [Antigipoksanti-antioksidanti dlya profilaktiki perioperatsionnykh narusheniy gemodinamiki u pozhilikh patsientov s perelomom bedra]. Meditsinski alfavit. 2015; 2(9): p. 23-9.

Dyomin V.V. NVF, KMV, DAV, DDV. Hemodynamics and heart rate variability in children with congenital heart defects during anesthesia. 2018;: p. 57-58.

Zabolotskikh I.B. VRV, TNV. Recruitment maneuver in conditions of general anesthesia during abdominal operations. Vestnik anestezioologii I reanimatologii. 2016; 13(6).

Pidgirniy Y.M. UZO, IAV. Multimodal anesthetic management of a stumectomy operation. Meditsina neotlozhnykh sostoyaniy. 2019; 4(99).

Nasriev S.A. KEG, MSS, ABR, PSK. Hemodynamic effect of selective spinal anesthesia during proctologic operations. Dostizheniya nauki I obrazovaniya. 2018; 1(729).

Kulikov A.Y. KOV, LKM. The effect of xenon anesthesia on hemodynamics: what we know by 2015. Anesteziologiya I reanimatologiya. 2015; 60(6).

Kuralov E.T. YAS, NHK. The effect of propofol on hemodynamics in anti-glaucomatous surgery in children. Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosi meditsini. 2016; 60(6)(5).

Kachur S.V. SAO. Pathophysiological assessment of stress response in the early postoperative period in patients operated on for lung tumors under multimodal anesthesia. Omskiy nauchniy vestnik. 2015; 2(144).

Yusupov A.S. KAE, ELK. Hemodynamic changes during pain relief in minor surgeries in children. Sovremennaya meditsina: noviye podkhody I aktualniye issledovaniya. 2019;: p. 11-17.

Terkawi AS, MTSHMJMHSTaMED. “Ondansetron does not attenuate hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery using subarachnoid anesthesia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.” 2015;: p. 344-348.

Helwani MA AMAAKDCJHBKH. Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. JBJS. 2015 Feb 4; 97(3): p. 186-93.

inLibrary — это научная электронная библиотека inConference - научно-практические конференции inScience - Журнал Общество и инновации UACD - Антикоррупционный дайджест Узбекистана UZDA - Ассоциации стоматологов Узбекистана АСТ - Архитектура, строительство, транспорт Open Journal System - Престиж вашего журнала в международных базах данных inDesigner - Разработка сайта - создание сайтов под ключ в веб студии Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil - ilmiy elektron jurnali yuridik va jismoniy shaxslarning in-Academy - Innovative Academy RSC MENC LEGIS - Адвокатское бюро SPORT-SCIENCE - Актуальные проблемы спортивной науки GLOTEC - Внедрение цифровых технологий в организации MuviPoisk - Смотрите фильмы онлайн, большая коллекция, новинки кинопроката Megatorg - Доска объявлений Megatorg.net: сайт бесплатных частных объявлений Skinormil - Космецевтика активного действия Pils - Мультибрендовый онлайн шоп METAMED - Фармацевтическая компания с полным спектром услуг Dexaflu - от симптомов гриппа и простуды SMARTY - Увеличение продаж вашей компании ELECARS - Электромобили в Ташкенте, Узбекистане CHINA MOTORS - Купи автомобиль своей мечты! PROKAT24 - Прокат и аренда строительных инструментов