ZOROASTRIANISM: THE ASPIRATION OF AN ANCIENT BELIEF TOWARDS PERFECTION

Abstract

 This article examines the emergence and development of Zoroastrian beliefs. Like other beliefs, Zoroastrianism has had a significant place in people's lives. It also reveals that some elements of the rituals of this faith have been preserved to this day. It also provides information about the discovery of elements of the Zoroastrian funeral ritual at archaeological sites.

 

 

International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics
Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2023
inLibrary
Google Scholar
 
Branch of knowledge
CC BY f
289-294
20

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Abdurasulov, A. . (2025). ZOROASTRIANISM: THE ASPIRATION OF AN ANCIENT BELIEF TOWARDS PERFECTION. International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics, 1(1), 289–294. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/ijpse/article/view/84932
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus
International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics

Abstract

 This article examines the emergence and development of Zoroastrian beliefs. Like other beliefs, Zoroastrianism has had a significant place in people's lives. It also reveals that some elements of the rituals of this faith have been preserved to this day. It also provides information about the discovery of elements of the Zoroastrian funeral ritual at archaeological sites.

 

 


background image

Volume 4, issue 2, 2025

289

ZOROASTRIANISM: THE ASPIRATION OF AN ANCIENT BELIEF TOWARDS

PERFECTION

Akmal Uralovich Abdurasulov

an independent researcher at

Nizami Tashkent State Pedagogical University

Annotation:

This article examines the emergence and development of Zoroastrian beliefs. Like

other beliefs, Zoroastrianism has had a significant place in people's lives. It also reveals that

some elements of the rituals of this faith have been preserved to this day. It also provides

information about the discovery of elements of the Zoroastrian funeral ritual at archaeological

sites.

Key words:

Zoroastrianism, religious beliefs, Bronze Age, agricultural culture, fire, monument,

cattle breeding, customs, dakhma, ossuary.

Annotatsiya:

Ushbu maqola zardushtilik e’toqodlarining paydo bulishi va uning rivojlanishini

o’rganadi. Insonlar xayotida boshqa etiqodlar singari zardushtiylik xam yaxshi o’rin egallagan.

Bu e’tiqod marosimlaridagi bazi elemintlarning bugungi kungacha saqlanib kelinayotganligi xam

ochib beradi. Zardushtiylikdagi ko’mish marosimi elemintlarining arxeologik joylarda topilgani

xaqida xam malumot beradi.

Kalit so‘zlar:

Zardushtiylik, diniy e’tiqodlar, bronza davri, dehqonchilik madaniyati, olov,

yodgorlik, chorvachilik, urf-odat, daxma, ostadon.

Аннотация:

В статье рассматривается возникновение и развитие зороастрийских

верований. Зороастризм, как и другие религии, занимает важное место в жизни людей.

Это также свидетельствует о том, что некоторые элементы религиозных ритуалов

сохранились до наших дней. В нем также содержится информация об обнаружении

элементов зороастрийских погребальных ритуалов на археологических памятниках.

Ключевые слова.

Зороастризм, религиозные верования, бронзовый век, земледельческая

культура, огонь, памятник, скотоводство, обычаи, дахма, ассуарий.

Zoroastrianism is one of the oldest world religions and has been the main religion of many

Eastern peoples for over a thousand years. Before the spread of Islam, the peoples of Central

Asia, Iran, and Azerbaijan followed this faith. Even after the arrival of Islam, this religion

maintained its position for a long time. The influence of Zoroastrianism grew stronger as several

states were established in the Middle East, and its customs and principles later affected the newly

formed religions and traditions.

As a result of analyzing the Avesta, it becomes evident that until the time of Zarathustra, our

primitive ancestors adhered to various tribal religious beliefs. Primitive relations were gradually

replaced by the earliest class-based society. A strong idea was necessary for the formation of this

era. Because local tribal religions became a force hindering the rise of society to a new stage of

development. In these complex times, the need arose to unite the various tribes of the region,

thereby uniting them around the idea of statehood. Zarathustra entered the historical arena as one

of the progressive people of his time, correctly understanding this necessity [1, – P. 197]

.

One of the features that completely distinguishes Zoroastrianism from other religions, such as the

worship of fire, is the peculiarity of the burial rite. The bodies were transported to special places

- burial chambers, and the bones, cleaned by birds, were placed in ossuaries. [2, – P. 53-56].

According to Zoroastrian teachings, it was considered a sin to bury people's bodies in the ground

after death. Therefore, after a person's death, their div was carried to special hills. These hills


background image

Volume 4, issue 2, 2025

290

were located far from human habitation, and on the hill various dogs, eagles, and wild birds ate

human flesh and separated it from bones. And the rain cleansed the bones even more. The sun

dried it completely. After this, people living around the hill collected the bones, placed them in

pottery vessels, and in many cases were buried in the deceased's house. These vessels were

called ostadons or ossuaries. The shape of the ostadon varied, with a rectangular base and a lid of

various shapes, even in the form of a human head or figure, sometimes resembling a jug,

sometimes in the form of a seated person. [3, 4]. The faces of the ostadon were decorated with

relief images or drawings. These images reflect the customs of people of that time, for example,

mourning events. Numerous such remains have been found in Central Asia, particularly in

Khorezm. (Xumbuztepa [2, - P. 53-56], Mizdahkon [5, - P. 65-70], Qirontov [6], Toq qal'a [7, - P.

171.; 8], etc.).

As mentioned above, creatures that cleanse bones after death (various dogs, eagles, wild birds)

were considered sacred. Especially in their work, the eagle was valued very differently in

people's lives. In the Kashkadarya region, elements of various religious beliefs are reflected in

many examples of material culture. One of the examples of material culture is the ossuaries

associated with burial rites, usually made of ceramics and stones. Ossuaries discovered and

studied during scientific research and numerous archaeological and ethnographic expeditions in

Kashkadarya are preserved in the "Shakhrisabz" State Museum-Reserve. In 2012, fragments of

printed (stamped) ossuaries dating back to the 6th-7th centuries were discovered in Yumoloktepa,

located 5 km southeast of Shahrisabz. The hill appears to consist of the remains of a small village

fortress. When the ossuary fragments were reconstructed by combining them, it was found that

two of them were whole ossuaries and one was half. All of them are red clay, have the same

composition in terms of shape and decorations, and their exterior is engraved in bright colors [9,

- P. 48-55].

One of the main reasons for the constant burning of fires in Zoroastrian temples was that during

the spread of belief, that is, at the end of the Bronze Age and the beginning of the Early Iron Age,

the climate in Central Asia cooled down. In turn, our ancestors, in order to help socially

vulnerable groups, constantly lit fires in temples, protecting them from the cold. Religious

lessons were also taught around the fire. onsequently, fire temples served not only as a religious

institution but also as a spiritual and social institution [10, - P. 31].

Fire held special significance in Zoroastrian rituals. Fire manifested itself in various forms:

celestial fire, fire hidden in a tree, fire burning in fire temples, divine fire, lightning fire, and fire

that gives warmth and life to the human div.

The burning bonfire was considered eternal and

was dedicated to the spirits of a particular deity or ancestors. They were preserved without being

erased and protected from the gaze of strangers and non-believers. The ash of the hearth or

fireplace was also considered sacred and was buried in sacred places [11, - P. 47-48]. Even

today, fire is considered sacred and is widely used in daily life. For example, in many places in

Surkhandarya, Kashkadarya, and Bukhara regions, when the bride arrives at the groom's house,

they circle around the fire at the entrance. In some places, the bride is carried by the groom and

circled around the fire three times. More often, in the oasis regions, before placing a child in a

cradle, they would step over the burning fire three times, according to such beliefs, there was a

belief that people who clung to the cradle would burn to death in the fire. In the Surkhan oasis,

many rituals of cleansers are performed with fire. This shows that the sacred fire rituals in

Zoroastrianism still continue in the daily rituals of people. Some other manifestations of the

customs of respect and attention to fire have been preserved in the lifestyle of the peoples of

Central Asia to this day. In the valley Kipchaks, the hearth of the household is never

extinguished. Not extinguishing the fire day and night in the hearth is a custom inherited from


background image

Volume 4, issue 2, 2025

291

our ancestors, and according to their understanding, a hearth without fire is like an ownerless,

lonely house. Only in a household whose hearth always burned with fire did there always be

prosperity [12, - P. 67]. In Zoroastrianism, specific funeral rites were developed [13, - P. 65-72].

At Zoroastrian burials, priests and relatives of the deceased recited special prayers for three days

and nights. Drinking water and eating were forbidden during rituals. Twice a year, during the

spring Navruz and autumn Mehrjon holidays, they would offer incense, charity, and sacrifices to

the spirits of their ancestors [11, - P. 46].

The Avesta reflects the socio-economic life, religious views, ideas about the world, customs, and

spiritual cultures of all Turkic peoples, Persian-Tajik, Azerbaijani, Afghan, and other peoples

who lived in Central Asia in ancient times. Stages of development of Zoroastrianism in Central

Asia.

Zoroastrianism is a doctrine that opposed the beliefs that deified the forces of nature that existed

in Central Asia in primitive times. He condemned unnecessary bloodshed, military conflicts, and

wars of aggression, calling for a settled and peaceful life, engaging in labor, farming, and animal

husbandry.

With his teachings, Zoroaster wants to teach people to live in peace and harmony, to work

honestly. According to the teachings of this religion, people's fate in the afterlife is determined

according to their life in this world, and after death, each person, according to their deeds in this

world, either enters eternal comfort - paradise, or if they have many evil deeds, they enter a place

of limbo - misvongatu, which sees neither joy nor sorrow [14, - P. 72].

The basis of Zoroastrianism is dualism, according to which the world is built on the basis of the

struggle of opposites. The eternal struggle between good and evil, light and darkness, life and

death continues. All good is represented by Ahura Mazda, and all evil is represented by Ahriman.

Ancient burials of the settled population of the Surkhandarya and Kashkadarya oases, dating

back to the 9th-4th centuries BC, have not been found. During this period, Zoroastrian burial

rites were widespread in the southern regions of Uzbekistan. Some bones of ancient people were

found and examined in the vicinity of Sangirtepa in Kashkadarya, Kyzyltepa and Bandikhontepa

in Surkhandarya. Dispersed bones of people from Sangirtepa and Kyzyltepa were found under

the surfaces of houses [15, - P. 28]. Thus, archaeological data indicate that burial rites in these

regions were based on Zoroastrian traditions.

The 4th-1st centuries BC were the flourishing period of ancient Khorezm, and monuments from

this period are numerous and diverse. Almost all ancient cities of Khorezm were built to defend

the oasis from neighboring steppe tribes. On the right bank of the Amu Darya, Jonboskala,

Bozorkala, Qurgoshinkala, Qirqqizkala, Ayozkala, and Tuproqqal'a, stretching from east to west,

were built close to each other and in a row at the foot of irrigation structures. The presence of a

unified defense system and extensive irrigation systems indicates that Khorezm was a powerful

centralized state. Until now, religious finds have been recorded in Kuzaliqir, considered the

oldest city in ancient Khorezm. Fragments of burial masks and hollow statues dating back to the

4th-3rd centuries BC were found in the temple complex and the center of the cult of kings in

Kuzalikir. Based on ash and small bone fragments, these hollow sculptures, dwarf ostadon, as

well as burial masks and box-shaped ash containers, to ostadon, and subsequently to statuary

ashtrays. In 1950-1954 BC. Numerous ossuaries have been found in the central part of the

Oybuyirkala settlement dating back to the 5th-4th centuries. The shape of the ostadon is barrel-

shaped, and there are many sculptures of a seated woman [16, - P. 68]. In the Ancient Khorezm

kingdom, which was formed in the 5th-4th centuries BC and pursued an independent policy, the

state religion was Zoroastrianism. During this period, the Old Khorezmian script (4th century BC)

emerged. Until recently, the main city of the country, which had not found its place in science,


background image

Volume 4, issue 2, 2025

292

Akchakhan Kala, was a ruined ancient city in Southern Khorezm, now under the Kyzylkum

dunes of the Beruni district of the Republic of Karakalpakstan.

Archaeologists of

Karakalpakstan under the leadership of Professor V.M. Yagodin, together with archaeologists

from the University of Sydney, Australia, have been conducting archaeological field research

since 1995. The monument consists of two parts, namely inner and outer cities, which are

surrounded by two rows of majestic defensive walls. The inner city part of Akchakhan fortress

covers 13 hectares, and its defensive walls are fortified with towers every 22-23 meters along its

perimeter. There are four entrance gates to the city on all sides [17, - P. 82-83]. In the center of

the city, on a high platform, stands the city's main fireplace. The flames burning in it were visible

from afar, beyond the city walls. When determining the time when the Avesta was written or

when Zoroaster lived, Soviet historians repeatedly focused their attention on the era of Kavi

Vishtaspa. According to the research of V.V. Struve and V.I. Abaev, Zarathustra and Kavi

Vishtaspa, who defended his views, were historical figures. According to V.V. Stroeve,..." For

the first time in Margiana, the largest mass of people accepted Zoroastrianism" [18, - P. 29].

Almost all prominent historians acknowledge that Central Asia was the first homeland of

Zoroastrianism. In particular, V.I. Abaev wrote that..."Zoroastrianism was formed in Eastern Iran,

in neighboring territories where settled culture and Scythian nomads lived," while M.M.

Dyakonov believes that the ancient parts of the "Avesta" were written in Bactria [19, - P. 60-73].

If I. Aliyev believes that the Avesta was created in the expanses of Eastern Media and Central

Asia, then K.V. Trever considers Sogd, and I.M. Dyakonov considers Bactria or Khorezm the

homeland of the Avesta [20, - P. 24.; 22, - P. 85.; 23, - P. 390]. Uzbek Avesta scholar M.

Ishoqov considers..."Khorezm, Sogd, and adjacent regions" as the place where the Avesta was

created [24, - P. 5]. The subsequent period in the development of Zoroastrianism began in the

3rd millennium BC. The last quarter of the 2nd millennium BC and the period before the

Achaemenid invasion. It was during this period that we observe the emergence of the truly

legitimized Zoroastrianism - the Avesta - in Central Asia. Archaeological data also confirm the

complete formation of Zoroastrianism during this period. If in the Bronze Age in the south of

Central Asia it was customary to bury the dead with their belongings, now this custom has been

abolished, since, although many archaeological monuments of this period have been excavated

(Kuchuktepa, Bandikhan I, Kyzylcha VI), archaeologists have not encountered a single grave.

This situation indicates a radical change in the customs of burial - the formation of

Zoroastrianism. The next stage in the development of Zoroastrianism can be called

Zoroastrianism of the Achaemenid period [25, - P. 198-207].

It seems that V.I. Abayev did not pay attention to the following scientific innovations on

Zoroastrianism of the Achaemenid period. In Bactria, along with Zoroastrianism, there are

archaeological sources indicating the preservation of the custom of burning the dead during the

Achaemenid period. An example of this is the Pshaktepa monument [26] discovered and studied

by Academician A.A. Askarov. Here, researchers witnessed burned human bones being buried

according to certain customs.

In the territory of Central Asia, the period of Kuchuk, Yaz I can be called a period of widespread

Zoroastrian traditions. According to the ideology of Zoroastrianism, the material culture and

customs of the population also changed. We see this primarily in the abolition of the custom of

burying the deceased. According to Zoroastrianism, customs such as considering water sacred,

honoring bread, and respecting the farmer were also among the requirements of this Zoroastrian

religion [27, - P. 5]. These customs continue to this day in our traditions and values. This is a

separate object of research, which is currently mainly studied by ethnologists.


background image

Volume 4, issue 2, 2025

293

Kazakh archaeologists have discovered Zoroastrian fire temples in the regions of Southern

Kazakhstan, Semirechye, and Taraz. The widespread prevalence of Zoroastrianism in these

regions is evidenced by the excavations of the ancient cemetery in Taraz and the ancient

settlement of Baba-ata near the Karatau Range.

Some researchers consider the territory of modern Kazakhstan to be the homeland of the founder

of Zoroastrianism. One of them, the Avestan scholar M. Boys, writes: "Based on the content and

language of the hymns composed by Zoroaster, it was established that he lived in the Asian

steppes east of the Volga." Indeed, nomadic pastoralism, the main occupation of the ancient

population of Kazakhstan, left an indelible mark on the views of Zoroastrians.

The "Avesta" shows special care for cattle and the improvement of their feed, pastures, and

animal breeds. This is clearly stated: a person who eats meat is more satisfied than a non-meat

eater. Excavations of the Tekturmas Zoroastrian cemetery in Taraz have shown that the external

forms of the ossuaries are represented by yurts. Their surfaces are decorated with geometric or

floral ornaments. Many cults associated with Zoroastrianism persisted in the cities of Kazakhstan

even after the appearance of Islam [28, - P. 96]. In the houses of Otrar in the 12th century,

archaeologists discovered hearth-altars [29].

Conclusion. Zoroastrianism is one of the ancient religions that occupies a special place in the

history of human civilization, the formation and improvement of which includes a long

evolutionary process. We analyzed the emergence of the religion of Zoroastrianism, its

appearance in various monuments from the Bronze Age, and its connection with such types of

economy as agriculture and animal husbandry. The religious beliefs of Zoroastrianism, the

veneration of the sacred fire, the idea of the struggle between good and evil, the significance of

customs and religious rituals in social and cultural life, as well as rituals through mausoleums

and ostadon, and traditions related to the deceased are of great importance. The results indicate

that Zoroastrianism can be evaluated not only as an ancient belief system, but also as a

worldview system striving for perfection, which had a significant impact on the spiritual and

cultural development of humanity.

REFERENCES:

1.

Асқаров А. Ўзбек халқининг этногенези ва этник тарихи. - Тошкент: Университет,

2007.– Б. 197.

2.

Баратов С.Р. Древнейшие этапы развития городской культуры Хорезмского оазиса.

Материалы международной конференции: «Ўзбекистон археологияси Мустақиллик

йилларида: ютуқлар ва истиқболлар». 15-16 сентябр 2016 г. Самарканд. 2016 ст. 53-56.

3.

Толстов С.П. Қадимги Хоразм маданиятини излаб. Т., Фан нашриёти, 1964.,

4.

Амиров Ш.Ш., Искандерова А.Д. Оссуарный могильник (Археологический объект

5) // Институт истории археологии и этнографии Каракалпакского отделения Академии

Наук Республики Узбекистан и Французский институт исследований Центральной Азии

(IFEAK) Археология Приаралья Выпуск VII1 Ташкент, Издательство “ФАН” .2008. – С. 29.

5.

Ходжаниязов Г., Юсупов Н.Ю., Қдырниязов М.Ш., Туребеков М., Авезова А.,

Сайпанов Б., Багдасарова Н. “Археологические исследования в некрополе Миздахкан.

Вестник Каракалпакского филиала Академии наук Уз ССР., Нукус. 1989. С. 65-70.

6.

Ходжаниязов Г., Юсупов Н., Амиров Ш., Даулетназаров Ж, Калменов М. Новые

археологические материалы с возвышенности Крантау. // Вестник ККО 2001. АН РУз. № 3.

7.

Ходжайов Т.К. О преднамеренной деформации головы у народов Средней Азии в

древности. // Вестник КК ФАН УзССР, № 4, 1966. – С. 171.

8.

Гудкова А.В. Ток-кала. Ташкент, 1964.


background image

Volume 4, issue 2, 2025

294

9.

Холматов О. Жанубий Сўғд Жамиятидаги Зардуштийлик Дини ва Юмалоқтепа

Оссуарийси // Synergy: journal of ethics and governance. Volume: 01 Issue: 06 | 2021. 48-55.

10.

Эргашев И.С., Собиров Д. А. Марказий Осиёда динларнинг тадрижий

ривожланиши // Фалсафа.

Илмий хабарнома. Серия: Гуманитар тадқиқотлар, 2020. №1

(45). – Б. 31.

11.

Сулаймонов Р.Ҳ. ва Исҳоқов М.М. Заратуштранинг ватани ва яшаган даврига оид

мулоҳозалар // Ўзбекистон тарихи. 1999. №1. – Б. 47-48.

12.

Аширов А. Ўзбек халқининг қадимий эътиқодлари ва маросимлари. Т. 2007. – Б. 67.

13.

Аширов А. Ўзбек халқи мотам маросимларида зардуштийлик излари // Ozbekiston

tarixi. 2002 № 1. – Б. 65-72.

14.

Агзамходжаев С., Раҳимжонов Д., Муҳамедов Н., Нажмиддинов Ж. Дунё динлари

тарихи. Ўқув қўлланма. Тошкент. 2011. – Б. 72.

15.

Сагдуллаев А. Қадимги Ўзбекистон илк ёзма манбаларда. – Т., Ўқитувчи. 1996. – Б.

28.

16.

Рапопорт Ю.А. Из истории религии Древнего Хорезма // ТХАЭЭ. Т. VI. – М.:

Наука, 1971. – С. 68.

17.

Эсанов М. ““Авесто” жамиятининг археологик материалларда акс этиши (Қадимги

Бақтрия ва Марғиёнанинг бронза даври моддий маданият ёдгорликлари мисолида)”. т.ф.н.

дис... – Тошкент, 2007. – Б. 82-83.

18.

Струве В.В. Этюды по истории Северного Причерноморья, Кавказа и Средней

Азии. - Л., 1968. - С. 29.

19.

Абаев В.И.. Скифский быт и реформа Зароастра // Archiv Orientalni, XXIV, 1956. -

С.23-36;

20.

Дьяконов М.М. Очерк истории древнего Ирана. - М.: 1961. – С. 60-73.

21.

Алиев И. Истории Мидии. - Баку, 1960. - С. 24;

22.

Тревер К.В. Гопадшах - пастух-царь // ТОВЭ, II, 1940. - С. 85;

23.

Дьяконов И.М. Истории Мидии от древнейших времен до конца IV века до н.э., М.-

Л., 1956. – С. 390.

24.

Исҳоқов М. «Авесто» - тарих ва маънавий дунёмиз сарчашмаси. «Авесто» ва унинг

инсоният тараққиётидаги ўрни. - Тошкент - Урганч, 2001, - Б. 5.

25.

Абаев В.И. Два зароастризма в Иране // ВДИ. - М.: 1990, №4. - С. 198-207.

26.

Аскаров А.А. Раскопки Пшактепа на юге Узбекистана

// ИМКУ 17,

1982. – С. 30-41.

27.

Хисматуллин А.А., Крюкова В.Ю. Смерть и похоронный обряд в исламе и

зороастризме. СПб. Петербургское востоковедение.1997. – С. 5

28.

Кузембайүлы А.Әбiл Е. История Республики Казахстан. – Алматы: «Санат», 1998.

– С. 96.

29.

https://www.sunhome.ru/religion/19568

References

Асқаров А. Ўзбек халқининг этногенези ва этник тарихи. - Тошкент: Университет, 2007.– Б. 197.

Баратов С.Р. Древнейшие этапы развития городской культуры Хорезмского оазиса. Материалы международной конференции: «Ўзбекистон археологияси Мустақиллик йилларида: ютуқлар ва истиқболлар». 15-16 сентябр 2016 г. Самарканд. 2016 ст. 53-56.

Толстов С.П. Қадимги Хоразм маданиятини излаб. Т., Фан нашриёти, 1964.,

Амиров Ш.Ш., Искандерова А.Д. Оссуарный могильник (Археологический объект 5) // Институт истории археологии и этнографии Каракалпакского отделения Академии Наук Республики Узбекистан и Французский институт исследований Центральной Азии (IFEAK) Археология Приаралья Выпуск VII1 Ташкент, Издательство “ФАН” .2008. – С. 29.

Ходжаниязов Г., Юсупов Н.Ю., Қдырниязов М.Ш., Туребеков М., Авезова А., Сайпанов Б., Багдасарова Н. “Археологические исследования в некрополе Миздахкан. Вестник Каракалпакского филиала Академии наук Уз ССР., Нукус. 1989. С. 65-70.

Ходжаниязов Г., Юсупов Н., Амиров Ш., Даулетназаров Ж, Калменов М. Новые археологические материалы с возвышенности Крантау. // Вестник ККО 2001. АН РУз. № 3.

Ходжайов Т.К. О преднамеренной деформации головы у народов Средней Азии в древности. // Вестник КК ФАН УзССР, № 4, 1966. – С. 171.

Гудкова А.В. Ток-кала. Ташкент, 1964.

Холматов О. Жанубий Сўғд Жамиятидаги Зардуштийлик Дини ва Юмалоқтепа Оссуарийси // Synergy: journal of ethics and governance. Volume: 01 Issue: 06 | 2021. 48-55.

Эргашев И.С., Собиров Д. А. Марказий Осиёда динларнинг тадрижий ривожланиши // Фалсафа. Илмий хабарнома. Серия: Гуманитар тадқиқотлар, 2020. №1 (45). – Б. 31.

Сулаймонов Р.Ҳ. ва Исҳоқов М.М. Заратуштранинг ватани ва яшаган даврига оид мулоҳозалар // Ўзбекистон тарихи. 1999. №1. – Б. 47-48.

Аширов А. Ўзбек халқининг қадимий эътиқодлари ва маросимлари. Т. 2007. – Б. 67.

Аширов А. Ўзбек халқи мотам маросимларида зардуштийлик излари // Ozbekiston tarixi. 2002 № 1. – Б. 65-72.

Агзамходжаев С., Раҳимжонов Д., Муҳамедов Н., Нажмиддинов Ж. Дунё динлари тарихи. Ўқув қўлланма. Тошкент. 2011. – Б. 72.

Сагдуллаев А. Қадимги Ўзбекистон илк ёзма манбаларда. – Т., Ўқитувчи. 1996. – Б. 28.

Рапопорт Ю.А. Из истории религии Древнего Хорезма // ТХАЭЭ. Т. VI. – М.: Наука, 1971. – С. 68.

Эсанов М. ““Авесто” жамиятининг археологик материалларда акс этиши (Қадимги Бақтрия ва Марғиёнанинг бронза даври моддий маданият ёдгорликлари мисолида)”. т.ф.н. дис... – Тошкент, 2007. – Б. 82-83.

Струве В.В. Этюды по истории Северного Причерноморья, Кавказа и Средней Азии. - Л., 1968. - С. 29.

Абаев В.И.. Скифский быт и реформа Зароастра // Archiv Orientalni, XXIV, 1956. - С.23-36;

Дьяконов М.М. Очерк истории древнего Ирана. - М.: 1961. – С. 60-73.

Алиев И. Истории Мидии. - Баку, 1960. - С. 24;

Тревер К.В. Гопадшах - пастух-царь // ТОВЭ, II, 1940. - С. 85;

Дьяконов И.М. Истории Мидии от древнейших времен до конца IV века до н.э., М.-Л., 1956. – С. 390.

Исҳоқов М. «Авесто» - тарих ва маънавий дунёмиз сарчашмаси. «Авесто» ва унинг инсоният тараққиётидаги ўрни. - Тошкент - Урганч, 2001, - Б. 5.

Абаев В.И. Два зароастризма в Иране // ВДИ. - М.: 1990, №4. - С. 198-207.

Аскаров А.А. Раскопки Пшактепа на юге Узбекистана // ИМКУ 17, 1982. – С. 30-41.

Хисматуллин А.А., Крюкова В.Ю. Смерть и похоронный обряд в исламе и зороастризме. СПб. Петербургское востоковедение.1997. – С. 5

Кузембайүлы А.Әбiл Е. История Республики Казахстан. – Алматы: «Санат», 1998. – С. 96.

https://www.sunhome.ru/religion/19568