ISSN:
2181-3906
2024
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 3 / ISSUE 4 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
624
FRENCH PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH A ZOONYM COMPONENT.
Aliyeva Gulzoda Tulkinovna
Doctoral student of Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10996761
Abstract.
In this article, to identify and systematize lexical-semantic, linguoculturological
and structural featuressystems of modern personal names in French. Competentuse of the
anthroponym form, knowledge of a foreign language and knowledge foreign cultural models of
personal names is one of the most important conditions the success of the process of intercultural
communication. Many questions related to the functioning of personal names have been
considered by various disciplines.
Key words:
zoonimy, onomastics, semantics, identification, linguoculturology.
ФРАНЦУЗСКИЕ ФРАЗЕОЛОГИЗМЫ С ЗООНИМИЧЕСКИМ КОМПОНЕНТОМ.
Аннотация.
В данной статье необходимо выявить и систематизировать лексико-
семантические, лингвокультурологические и структурные особенности системы
современных личных имен во французском языке. Грамотное использование
антропонимической формы, знание иностранного языка и знание инокультурных моделей
личных имен является одним из важнейших условий успешности процесса межкультурной
коммуникации. Многие вопросы, связанные с функционированием личных имен,
рассматривались различными дисциплинами.
Ключевые
слова:
зоонимия,
ономастика,
семантика,
идентификация,
лингвокультурология.
Most phraseologists paid primary attention to the special status of phraseological units in
the language, their specific categorical properties, and unmodeled syntactic structure. The internal
contents of these units remained virtually out of sight. In addition, the task of identifying the
special essence of phraseological meaning was solved mainly by comparing the meanings of
phraseological units and words.
The bulk of research by foreign linguists, in particular French, was carried out in a
diachronic manner. Typical in this regard is the work of P. Guiraud, who is primarily interested in
the etymology of the properties of phraseological units, and who sees the main reason for
phraseologization in the presence of linguistic or extralinguistic (extralinguistic) archaism in the
composition of the phrase.
In this study, we did not abandon the attempt to find out the reasons and origins of the
appearance of relevant features of phraseological units. But we tried to transfer the direction of
analysis of these units to synchrony and, first of all, to their semantics, as the most significant,
essential, emphasizing their national identity and determining their properties in the functional,
communicative and connotative planes.
Putting forward the concept of the specificity of the structure of the semantic content of
phraseological units, we set ourselves the goal of studying the semantic space of the language,
which is revealed by analyzing the semantics of phraseological units with a zoonym component in
the French language.
ISSN:
2181-3906
2024
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 3 / ISSUE 4 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
625
Having chosen French phraseological units containing a zoonym, we could not even
foresee that a relatively limited set (only 1500 phraseological units) would appear as an
exceptionally multifaceted phenomenon.
We examined the object of study from different angles, and as a result, the study acquired
the character of a multidimensional analysis of linguistic material. The work reflects various issues
(some of them are debatable in modern science), such as: the formal grammatical organization of
phraseological units, the specifics of the semantic structure, functional features, pragmatic
meaning, significance in the processes of cognition and objectification of the world.
During the study, we made a number of conclusions.
Firstly, we classify phraseological units with a zoonym component as nominative units as
a result of secondary indirect nomination due to the presence in their semantic structure of a
subject-conceptual core, which helps to correlate these units with the realities of the surrounding
reality.
Secondly, in the structure of phraseological meaning, the dominant component is the
connotative component, which explains the unlimited possibilities of phraseological units in the
role of expressing emotional and evaluative meanings, relegating the nominative function to the
background.
Thirdly, in line with the new broad interpretation, connotation appears as a component of
the PU, which contains the most important semantic elements that correlate with certain
components of the external structure of the PU, and with its functional purpose, as well as a wide
range of ethnocultural information. Phraseologisms are an encyclopedia of knowledge about the
French people
- a native speaker of French: about unique character traits, habits, views, customs, history,
way of life. Thanks to phraseological units, a person penetrates into an unknown national culture
and becomes acquainted with the enormous wealth stored in the language being studied.
Fourthly, phraseological units with a zoonym differ from other types of phraseological
units of the French language in their stylistic reduction. Distributed primarily in the colloquial-
familiar, vernacular and argotic functional registers, they are a means of communication, a way of
adding brightness to speech and, to some extent, a speech code for the lower strata of French
society and individual professional groups.
Fifthly, from the point of view of expressing the meaning of the overall “good/bad”
assessment, the vast majority of phraseological units studied are marked negatively. Moreover, a
distinctive feature of this type of phraseological units is the inclusion in the evaluative aspect of
their meaning of various private evaluative values (sensory-gustatory, psychological, aesthetic,
ethical, normative), which make it possible to reveal the features of the value scale of French
speakers.
Sixth, one of the purposes of phraseological units with an animalistic component as specific
nominative-expressive means is to depict a complete, finely differentiated “portrait” of a typical
representative of a linguistic community speaking French, and to display his physical, moral,
intellectual, and social appearance. From here we conclude that phraseological units with a
zoonym are anthropomorphic, that is, they reflect those realities and spheres of life that are closely
related to the person himself, his activities, his interests, etc.
ISSN:
2181-3906
2024
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 3 / ISSUE 4 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
626
Finally, we believe that the specific features of the structure of the meaning of French
phraseological units are partly due to the semantics of the key word, which is a zoonym, which
influences the formation of phraseological meaning, introducing elements of its semantic content,
namely: the semes “a person with the property of an animal”, “property animal, inherent in man",
"assessment".
As it seems to us as a result of the analysis carried out, the study of phraseological units
with a zoonym component would be useful to continue with the involvement of wider linguistic
material, perhaps some classes of background vocabulary of the French language or even
phraseological corpora of other languages, in order to establish the reasons for the historical,
etymological, social the nature of various language processes.
REFERENCES
1.
Avaliani Yu.Yu. On the semantic connections of words in independent function and as part
of phraseological units // Questions of describing the lexical-semantic system of language.
Abstract. report scientific conf. - M., 1971. - P.15-19.
2.
Avaliani Yu.Yu., Emirova A.M. Towards the semantic structure of phraseological units //
Proceedings of the Samarkand State. University named after A. Navoi. Vol. 217. Questions
of phraseology, IV. Samarkand, 1971. - P.29-34.
3.
Alefirenko N.F. Onomasiological isomorphism of multi-level units of language //
Onomasiological aspects of semantics. Volgograd, 1993.-P.3-13.
4.
Apresyan Yu.D. On the question of the meaning of phraseological units (based on the
material of the English language) // Foreign languages at school. 1957. - No. 6. -WITH.
12-22.
5.
Arutyunova N.D. Types of linguistic meanings: Evaluation. Event. Fact. M.: Nauka, 1988.
- 314 p.
