HYBRIDIZED: A PHILOSOPHY OF DEPARTMENT IN INITIAL TEENS AUTHORITY.

J. Thomas

HYBRIDIZED: A PHILOSOPHY OF DEPARTMENT IN INITIAL TEENS AUTHORITY.

HAC

inLibrary

Google Scholar

25-04-2021

Journal:

CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES

Issue:

No. 04 (2021)

J. Thomas

Department Of Social And Political Science University Of Wollongong, Australia

dfever@masterjournals.com

01-04

To share

Download

Article on Google Scholar

J. Thomas, . (2021). HYBRIDIZED: A PHILOSOPHY OF DEPARTMENT IN INITIAL TEENS AUTHORITY. CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2(04), 01–04. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/crjps/article/view/18798

Citations

Сrossref

Scopus

Google

Keywords:

authority / hybridized

Abstract

Contemporary social science research concerning authority ends to take an institutional perspective that privileges structural analysis. The resulting body of literature has an emphasis on classification, typologies and regimes. This approach has been criticized on the basis that it neglects the role of department and context when research concerns complex and heterogeneous community authority cases. An emerging literature on hybridized in social services aims to address the limitations of structural accounts by acknowledging that diverse logics, ideas, and norms influence the way community based social services resist or adapt in turbulent policy environments. This article considers the strengths and limitations of hybridized in development of a research frame working corporation structure, department and ideas. The relevance of hybridized philosophy for the Kids in Communities study—an Australian research project investigating neighbourhood influences on child development across multiple case study sites is evaluated.

HYBRIDIZED: A PHILOSOPHY OF DEPARTMENT IN INITIAL TEENS AUTHORITY.

Keywords:

Abstract

Similar Articles