âÐÒÑиÑодиÑÑ Ð²Ð° инноваÑион ÑÐµÑ Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸ÑлаÑâ илмий ÑлекÑÑон жÑÑнали. â 4, иÑлÑ-авгÑÑÑ, 2015 йил
1
www.iqtisodiyot.uz
K.Khotamov,
senior researcher of the Banking and
Finance Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan
ISSUES OF IMPROVING ANALYSIS OF TAXES
ÐазкÑÑ Ð¼Ð°Òолада билвоÑиÑа ÑолиÒлаÑдан бÑÐ´Ð¶ÐµÑ Ð´Ð°ÑомадлаÑини
ÑаклланÑиÑиÑда аÑоÑий ÑÑинни Ñгаллайдиган ÒÑÑилган ÒÐ¹Ð¸Ð¼Ð°Ñ ÑолиÒи ҳаÒида
ÑÑз ÑÑиÑилган. ÐÑнда ÒÑÑилган ÒÐ¸Ð¹Ð¼Ð°Ñ ÑолиÒининг коÑÑ
она молиÑвий ҳолаÑига
ÑаÑÑиÑи ÑÑганилган. ТадÒиÒÐ¾Ñ Ð¶Ð°ÑаÑнида Ð±Ð¸Ñ ÒанÑа олимлаÑнинг ÑикÑлаÑи
ÑÑганилган. ÐÐ·Ð»Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð½Ð°ÑижаÑи бÑйиÑа амалий миÑÐ¾Ð»Ð»Ð°Ñ ÑÑдамида Ñ
ÑлоÑа ва
ÑаклиÑÐ»Ð°Ñ Ð±ÐµÑилган.
ÐÐ°Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÑаÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ÑвÑÑена вопÑоÑам изÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñоли одного из коÑвеннÑÑ
налогов, налога на добавленнÑÑ ÑÑоимоÑÑÑ, Ð´Ð¾Ð»Ñ ÐºÐ¾ÑоÑого ÑвлÑеÑÑÑ
доминиÑÑÑÑей в ÑоÑмиÑовании доÑ
одов бÑджеÑа. ÐÑоме Ñого, в ÑÑаÑÑе
изÑÑаеÑÑÑ Ð²Ð»Ð¸Ñние ÐÐС на ÑинанÑовое положение пÑедпÑиÑÑиÑ, а Ñакже
пÑедÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð¼Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑазлиÑнÑÑ
ÑÑенÑÑ
-ÑкономиÑÑов. ÐÑÐ¸Ð½Ð¸Ð¼Ð°Ñ Ð²Ð¾ внимание
ÑезÑлÑÑаÑÑ Ð¸ÑÑледованиÑ, в ÑÑаÑÑе пÑедÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ»ÑÑение и наÑÑно
обоÑнованнÑе ÑекомендаÑии.
Key words:
indirect taxes, value added tax, direct tax, tax rate, market price
for one item, cost of sales of the overall production, quantity of goods produced,
profit of company, tax burden.
In modern economies taxes are considered the main financial source for
regulating economy as well as social, economic and political activities of the
government. Taxes comprise the method of formulating the state budget and taxation
can act as the factor influencing the development of this or that process.
In foreign practice according to the economic essence taxes are divided into
direct and indirect taxes.
Direct taxes are levied directly from the object of taxation and the owner of the
income of the property can act as the taxpayer of the direct taxes. Indirect taxes are
the taxes which are added to the price of goods and services so the taxpayer of
indirect taxes is a final consumer of goods and services on which shoulders the tax
burden falls. So companies add indirect taxes to the price of manufactured goods or
services and then remit the amount of taxes to the budget.
Nowadays indirect taxes are widely used as the main source of the budget
revenue. Economic activity of businesses, in turn, is also encouraged by direct taxes
which formulate the revenue part of the state budget.
There are various approaches to the classification of taxes into direct and
indirect. Russian scientist, A. Nachalov has stated that âIndirect taxes are taxes which
are accrued to the price of goods and services by central and local governments. They
are not connected with the income of the taxpayer and are added as special tariffs to
the price of goods and servicesâ [1].
âÐÒÑиÑодиÑÑ Ð²Ð° инноваÑион ÑÐµÑ Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸ÑлаÑâ илмий ÑлекÑÑон жÑÑнали. â 4, иÑлÑ-авгÑÑÑ, 2015 йил
2
www.iqtisodiyot.uz
According to the opinion of English economist and statesman John Stuart Mill
âIf direct taxes are charged from the taxpayer himself, the tax burden of indirect taxes
is shifted to the taxpayer by other personsâ [2].
Former Minister of Finance of France Joseph Marie Terray has noticed that
âindirect taxes are levied graduallyâ [2].
So we can make a conclusion that indirect taxes are added as an additional cost
to the manufactured goods, accomplished works and rendered services. They are
compulsory indirect payments to the state budget in the form of additional costs in
the structure of the turnover.
The object of indirect taxes is the value of sold goods, accomplished works and
rendered services. It is connected not with the income or profit received, but is
referred to additional cost accrued to the value of turnover. In this case, the value of
manufactured products, accomplished works and rendered services should be
converted into goods.
Producers of goods and services are considered legal payers of indirect taxes.
However, at the end of the process, legal persons or individuals consume those goods
and services which comprise the object of indirect taxes.
Therefore in the opinion of the enterprise it is not so important to distinguish
direct and indirect taxes from the point of view of their economic and social role.
Irrespective of the fact, if they are direct taxes or indirect taxes, they are considered to
the revenue source of the budget. Anyway their taxpayers will be consumers â either
legal persons or individuals.
Nowadays in the structure of the budget revenue the share of the Value Added
Tax (VAT) is the biggest.
The VAT was implemented in the tax practice in some countries of Western
Europe in the 70s of the XX century. The reason and legal foundation for this was
adoption of the special resolution on uniting all existing legal norms on charging the
VAT in the territory of countries â members of the European community. This
resolution was adopted in 1977 and according to this document the VAT was
considered the main type of indirect taxes.
According to the economic literary sources France was the first country in the
world where the VAT was introduced. In 1977 in compliance with the adopted
resolution the VAT was introduced in several European countries at the same time.
The VAT played a big role in establishing and developing integration processes in the
countries of Western Europe so this tax was named as âEuropeanâ tax.
Nowadays the VAT also plays a big role in formulating the revenue part of the
state budget in the countries â members of the European Union. The role of indirect
taxes in Europe is significantly bigger that the role of these taxes in the USA, Japan,
Canada and Australia. In European countries the share of indirect taxes amounts to
more than 40% in the volume of the overall tax revenue and in some countries like
Mexico, Turkey and Korea it accounts for more than 50%. In the USA, Japan,
Canada and Australia this indicator equals to 25-30%. The main reason for high share
of indirect taxes in the structure of the tax revenue in countries â members of the
European Union is generalization of tax rates in these countries and their mutual
harmonization with the taxation base.
âÐÒÑиÑодиÑÑ Ð²Ð° инноваÑион ÑÐµÑ Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸ÑлаÑâ илмий ÑлекÑÑон жÑÑнали. â 4, иÑлÑ-авгÑÑÑ, 2015 йил
3
www.iqtisodiyot.uz
This issue has a practical importance for the Republic of Uzbekistan because
the major share of goods turnover belongs to Russia, the Ukraine and the Republic of
Kazakhstan. For the time being the problem of generalizing the rates of the VAT
between these countries and harmonization of the tax base hasnât been solved yet.
This, in turn, can prevent development of foreign trade relations between these
countries.
The VAT has been implemented in practice of the Republic of Uzbekistan
since 1992. This tax was introduced to replace the tax on turnover and tax on sales.
The difference between the VAT and turnover tax is that the VAT is charged at each
stage and a final tax burden falls on the taxpayer. However, the turnover tax was
levied only once on the overall turnover.
The main reason for introducing the VAT in Uzbekistan was the experience of
the world community in imposing this kind of tax. As the practice of advanced
foreign countries shows, accounting of indirect taxes was developing and the VAT
has turned to be the tax which does not disturb the sale of any goods and does not
change finance distribution in economic activity. From the point of view of scientists,
the practice of the Value Added Tax has advanced the theory of the VAT and the
share of indirect taxes is significant in the budget structure of some countries.
In Uzbekistan the rate of the VAT accounted for 30% in 1992, in 1996 it was
reduced to 17%. In 1997 the rate amounted to 18% and a reduced rate of 10% was
applied to some food products (flour, bread, meat, milk and dairy products). In 1999
Uzbekistan applied 3-level VAT rate of 20, 15 and 10%. Only 3 items â export,
mineral fertilizers and oil for agricultural needs and goods (services) realized by
diplomats were imposed the VAT at zero rate. The VAT at 15% rate was levied on
flour, bread, meat, milk and dairy products and imported cattle and grain. Since 2000
up to now 20% rate and zero rated have been applied in Uzbekistan.
The VAT is levied at each stage of the process of purchase, production,
distribution and realization of goods, rendering services from the value added. In
practice if the government or the enterprise are the final consumers the total tax
burden of this tax falls on the enterprise. In these cases economic entities pay the
VAT not from the value added but from the overall turnover. We should always keep
in mind that the value added is the overall turnover for the final consumer. Taking it
into consideration we can make a conclusion that the VAT is the tax imposed on the
value (turnover) added in the process of production, offering services or sale because
as we have mentioned above if the final consumer is a legal person, the VAT is
considered to be the tax levied on the overall turnover.
If we generalize the points of view of scientists mentioned above, we can make
a conclusion that the VAT is an indirect tax, its burden is shifted to the taxpayers by
others, and its real burden falls on the consumer at the end. We will try to analyze the
impact of the amount of tax on the financial position of any enterprise and to give our
opinion on this point.
While analyzing the factors influencing on the amount of taxes it is
recommended to consider the impact of the amount of the VAT on financial position
of the enterprise. Nowadays the higher share of the VAT in the budget revenue is the
more dependents budget has. The followings can be referred to the dependent:
âÐÒÑиÑодиÑÑ Ð²Ð° инноваÑион ÑÐµÑ Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸ÑлаÑâ илмий ÑлекÑÑон жÑÑнали. â 4, иÑлÑ-авгÑÑÑ, 2015 йил
4
www.iqtisodiyot.uz
ï·
Due to the non-accurate organization of the order of charging the VAT giving
tax benefits to some enterprises will lead to the increase of the amount of the VAT
paid;
ï·
Non-compliance between advance payments of the VAT and the time of its
charging from consumers.
While analyzing the VAT we should take into account the following:
ï·
impact of the VAT on the funds of the enterprise and results of its financial
activity;
ï·
Reduction of turnover funds (advance payments for raw materials and
inventories). We are going to give our opinion on the following problem basing on
the analysis of the following table.
Table 1.
Order of analyzing impact of the VAT on the financial position of the company
on the basis of the turnover
Indicators
A
enterprise
B
enterprise
Difference
(+; -)
1
2
3
4
Cost of the commodities and raw
materials purchased, thousand UZS
800000
1000000
+200000
Amount of the VAT paid, thousand UZS
160000
200000
+40000
Period of production, days
30
30
-
Quantity of goods produced, kg.
1500
1800
+300
Money spent on one item, thousand UZS
700
750
+50
Total value of production, thousand UZS
1050000
1350000
+300000
Cost of sales, thousand UZS
1200000
1500000
+300000
Calculated amount of the VAT, thousand
UZS
240000
300000
+60000
Proceeds from the sale of the product,
total
1440000
1800000
+360000
VAT paid to the budget, thousand UZS
(8-2)
80000
100000
+20000
Source: Developed by the author basing on the results of the research.
If we analyze the figures stated in the table no impact of the VAT during the
process of production is supposed to be observed. However, the period of
manufacturing accounts for 30 days and circulation of turnover funds influences on
the financial position of the enterprise in the process of charging the VAT from the
consumers and remitting them to the budget. This enterprise is not considered to be
the final consumer so we are proposing the following analysis:
1.
If we divide the cost of sales of products into a number of goods produced
we will get a market price for one item.
âAâ enterprise:
âÐÒÑиÑодиÑÑ Ð²Ð° инноваÑион ÑÐµÑ Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸ÑлаÑâ илмий ÑлекÑÑон жÑÑнали. â 4, иÑлÑ-авгÑÑÑ, 2015 йил
5
www.iqtisodiyot.uz
M
P
= C
S
/ Q
G
.
where
M
P
= market price for one item;
C
S
= cost of sales of the overall
production;
Q
G
= quantity of goods produced; so:
M
P
= 1200000 / 1500 = 800 UZS.
Cost of sales for one item differs from the cost of production of one item by
100 (800 â 700) thousand UZS.
âBâ enterprise:
M
P
=C
S
/ Q
G.
where
M
P
= market price for one item;
C
S
= cost of sales of the overall
production;
Q
G
= quantity of goods produced; so:
M
P
= 1500000 / 1800 = 833.3 UZS.
Cost of sales for one item differs from the cost of production of one item by 83
(833 â 750) thousand UZS.
2.
If we divide advance payment of the VAT (A
VAT
) into the cost of production
of one item (C
P
)we will get quantity of conditionally produced goods (QCPG):
QCPG = A
VAT
/ C
P
â
Aâ enterprise:
QCPG = 160000 / 700 = 228.6
Profit of company = QCPG * Profit = 228.6 * 100 = 22860 thousand UZS;
â
Bâ enterprise: QCPG = 200000 / 750 = 266.6
Profit of company = QCPG * Profit = 266.6 * 83.3 = 22207.8 thousand UZS.
So if we analyze intermediary activity of the enterprise by the VAT we can see
that profit of âAâ enterprise reduced by 22860 thousand UZS, âBâ enterprise - by
22207.8 thousand UZS. As a conclusion we can say if the VAT didnât exist at all
profit of the enterprise would be higher.
In the result of calculations the profit of âAâ enterprise accounts for 150000
thousand UZS, the loss in relation to profit occurred during the period of circulation
of turnover funds due to the VAT equals to 15. 24 per cent (22860 / 150000 * 100),
while of âBâ enterprise amounts to 14.8 per cent (22207.8 / 150000 * 100).
We can observe reduction of the VAT by 15% from the profit. This process
considerably impacts on financial position of the large manufacturing enterprises,
companies involved in export operations, and agricultural companies.
Therefore it is rather difficult to say that the VAT paid by the enterprises
doesnât influence on the financial position of the enterprise. In the enterprises with
quick turnover this influence is slightly less.
On the other hand, while analyzing tax burden usually only really paid taxes
are taken into account. In many scientific papers the VAT is considered to be an
indirect tax and its burden completely falls on the final consumer.
âÐÒÑиÑодиÑÑ Ð²Ð° инноваÑион ÑÐµÑ Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸ÑлаÑâ илмий ÑлекÑÑон жÑÑнали. â 4, иÑлÑ-авгÑÑÑ, 2015 йил
6
www.iqtisodiyot.uz
Basing on the data stated above, we can make the following conclusions:
1.
In our opinion, when the enterprise which doesnât pay the VAT purchases
fixed assets or intangible assets the VAT added to their value should be taken into
account while analyzing taxes and calculating the tax burden. The reason for it is that
irrespective of the terms of payment of the VAT, anyway, it is transferred to the
budget.
2.
In our opinion, each taxpayer feels the burden of the VAT impact.
3.
It is necessary to take into account analytical information when accounting
the VAT at the economic entities. We believe that timely and correct preparation of
the accounting balance and income statement, accounts of the VAT will facilitate
analysis of the VAT, and, as a result, timely provision the revenue part of the state
budget with the taxes.
Reference
1.
A. Nachalov. Tax Dictionary. Moscow. Tax â Info, 2004. - 102 p. (in
Russian)
2.
A. Chernika. Taxes. Moscow. Finance and statistics, 1996. â 17-18 p. (in
Russian).