Authors

  • Bekzod Iskandarov
    Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.jmsi.123881

Abstract

Today, the rapid economic development of the construction industry is explained by the increasing role of this sector in the country's economy, including in the gross domestic product. We used the vertical analysis method to analyze the economic indicators of this sector.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 5, 2025

932

IN UZBEKISTAN CONSTRUCTION WORKS STATUS ANALYSIS

Iskandarov Bekzod Abdujalilovich

teacher at Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service

Abstract

: Today, the rapid economic development of the construction industry is explained by

the increasing role of this sector in the country's economy, including in the gross domestic

product. We used the vertical analysis method to analyze the economic indicators of this sector.

Keywords

: research level, technical capacity of the enterprise

From the analysis of the data in the following table, it can be seen that the information on

housing units commissioned in our country in the period under study 2012-2021 and the

coefficient of change in their total area are presented in Table 3.4. From the data in this table, it

can be seen that during the ten years under analysis, it has been increasing since 2017, and only

in 2019 and 2020, as a result of the impact of the current situation (pandemic), we can see a

decrease in the indicators. It can be observed that the average interest coefficient of the total

number of houses built during the period under study was 1.04, which is also explained by the

significant development in the construction sector and its high development indicators.

Table 3.4
By housing units launched
information

1

(coefficient of change of total area of housing units)

201

2

201

3

201

4

201

5

201

6

201

7

201

8

201

9

202

0

202

1

Averag

e

coeffici

ent of

variati

on

Coefficient

of

change in the

total number of

apartments built

1.13 1.03 1.05 0.99 0.9

3

1.15 1.14 1.13 0.73 1.01 1.01

Including:

state

0.60 1.67 1.20 2.33 0.4

3

1.33 1.38 5.45 0.58 0.85 0.96

non-

governmental

1.13 1.03 1.05 0.98 0.9

4

1.15 1.14 1.09 0.74 1.02 1.01

1

Compiled by the author based on data from the State Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 5, 2025

933

In cities

Coefficient

of

change in the

total number of

apartments built

1.16 1.03 1.12 1.17 0.8

9

1.16 1.39 1.23 0.68 1.12 1.06

Including:

state

1.61 1.32 0.67 2.23 0.6

4

1.11 1.80 2.75 0.19 1.21 0.78

non-

governmental

1.15 1.02 1.14 1.14 0.9

0

1.16 1.38 1.17 0.72 1.12 1.06

In rural areas

Coefficient

of

change in the

total number of

apartments built

1.12 1.04 1.04 1.02 0.9

6

0.96 1.07 1.11 0.93 1.03 1.02

Including:

state

1.06 0.22 49.2

5

2.29 0.2

3

0.70 0.28 1.52 75.1

3

1.05 0.59

non-

governmental

1.12 1.04 1.04 1.01 0.9

6

0.96 1.07 1.11 0.91 1.03 1.02

From the data in the table, it can be seen that the average coefficient of interest in the

construction works carried out by ownership forms was somewhat higher in the state network

(0.96), and the average coefficient of interest in the construction works carried out in urban and

rural areas was almost the same, with coefficients of 1.06 and 1.02. All quantitative data on this

table can be found in Appendix 3.
According to the data in the table below, the average coefficient of interest change in the number

of apartments built in our country by ownership form between 2012 and 2021 was 1.02, with

1.01 in the public sector and 1.02 in the private sector, and there is no sharp difference between

these indicators. It should also be noted that if 99.6 percent of the apartments built in 2012 were

in the private sector, and the remaining 0.4 percent were in the public sector, then by the end of

2021 this indicator was 94.9 percent, and 5.1 percent were in the public sector (Table 3.5).

Table 3.5
Information about apartments built according to ownership forms

2

(coefficient of variation)

2

Compiled by the author based on data from the State Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 5, 2025

934

2012 201

3

201

4

201

5

201

6

201

7

201

8

201

9

202

0

202

1

Averag

e

coeffici

ent of

variati

on

Coefficient

of

change in the

total number of

apartments built

1.13 1.03 1.05 0.99 0.9

3

1.1

5

1.14 1.13 0.7

3

1.15 1.02

Including
by

ownership

form:

state

0.60 1.67 1.20 2.33 0.4

3

1.3

3

1.38 5.45 0.5

8

1.46 1.01

non-

governmental

1.13 1.03 1.05 0.98 0.9

4

1.1

5

1.14 1.09 0.7

4

1.13 1.02

In conclusion, it can be said that in recent years, the indicator of the number of apartments being

built by the public sector has been increasing. Data with all quantitative indicators according to

this table are presented in Appendix 4.
Table 3.6 below presents the interest indices of data on housing units commissioned in the

Republic of Karakalpakstan, regions and the city of Tashkent from all sources. It can be seen

from this table that detailed information on housing units completed and commissioned in our

country during the analyzed period 2012-2021 is presented according to the interest index.

Table 3.6
Information on housing units commissioned by the Republic of Karakalpakstan, regions

and the city of Tashkent from all sources

3

(coefficient of variation)

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Average

coefficient of

variation

Republic

of

Uzbekistan

1.13 1.04 1.06 1.06 0.94 1.02 1.17 1.16 0.83 1.03 1.03

Republic

of

Karakalpakstan

1.29 0.95 1.02 0.99 0.78 1.18 1.24 1.45 0.61 1.01 0.99

regions

3

Compiled by the author based on data from the State Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 5, 2025

935

Andijan

0.91 1.21 1.05 0.97 1.08 0.98 1.34 1.08 1.17 1.03 1.07

Bukhara

1.09 1.01 1.06 1.08 0.98 1.05 1.55 1.02 1.02 1.04 1.08

Jizzakh

1.08 1.06 1.06 0.94 1.25 0.83 1.15 0.99 0.81 1.07 1.00

Kashkadarya

1.00 1.02 1.04 1.11 1.08 1.06 1.00 0.89 0.97 1.03 1.02

Navoi

0.92 1.07 1.13 1.09 1.01 1.06 1.09 1.00 0.95 1.03 1.03

Namangan

1.15 0.91 1.11 1.02 1.10 0.93 1.11 1.40 0.76 1.01 1.03

Samarkand

1.05 1.11 1.06 1.08 0.70 1.03 1.11 0.93 0.76 1.04 0.96

Surkhandarya

1.11 1.07 0.99 1.12 1.01 0.88 1.12 0.95 1.11 1.04 1.03

Syrdarya

1.11 0.98 0.76 0.85 0.84 0.90 0.87 1.73 1.65 1.04 1.00

Tashkent

1.57 1.10 1.25 0.91 0.99 1.04 1.12 1.40 0.79 1.01 1.09

Fergana

1.01 1.07 1.05 1.07 0.75 1.04 1.45 0.99 0.83 1.03 1.00

Khorezm

1.20 0.95 1.07 1.23 0.98 0.77 1.12 0.93 0.98 1.03 1.01

Tashkent city

1.66 0.97 1.13 1.22 0.72 1.33 1.29 1.66 0.36 1.10 0.94

According to it, we can see that the average coefficient of change in the interest rate of housing

units launched in the republic was 1.03 and that over the last 4 years, that is, since 2017, it has

been decreasing slightly, and since 2021, the coefficient of interest has increased. During the

analysis, the decrease in housing construction indicators between 2017 and 2020 is also

explained by the current situation during the pandemic. Before that, that is, until 2017, it can be

seen that it increased by small amounts. We can see that the lowest indicator of this indicator by

region was in Tashkent city (0.94) and the highest indicator was in Tashkent region (1.09). These

indicators are explained by the fact that in these regions, including Tashkent region, the need for

housing and high incomes of the population are high, while the low indicator for Tashkent city

can be explained by the relatively slow population growth in Tashkent city in previous periods.

Data with quantitative indicators for this table are presented in Appendix 5.
The following table shows the coefficient of change in the number of apartments built in the

Republic of Karakalpakstan , regions and the city of Tashkent. Analysis of the data in this table

shows that, unlike the table above, this table provides information on apartments, that is,

residential housing, built in the regions of our country.

Reference

1. Anchishkin A. Prognozirov a nie​ really socialist economic - M.: Ekonomika , 1973.
2. Gorbunov E. Economic potency a l developed socialist society // Questions Economics ,

1981, No. 9.
3. Kholboyev UX Theoretical issues of increasing the competitiveness of the service sector.

Journal of Management Values & Ethics. August 24 Special Issue, ISSN-2249-9512, page 291-

296.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 5, 2025

936

4. Kholboyev UX Competitiveness in the service sector regulatory documents aimed at ensuring

and improving. Bulletin news in NewScience Society International Scientific Journal. Vol 1

Issue 6, 2024, pages 276-279.

References

Anchishkin A. Prognozirov a nie​ really socialist economic - M.: Ekonomika , 1973.

Gorbunov E. Economic potency a l developed socialist society // Questions Economics , 1981, No. 9.

Kholboyev UX Theoretical issues of increasing the competitiveness of the service sector. Journal of Management Values & Ethics. August 24 Special Issue, ISSN-2249-9512, page 291-296.

Kholboyev UX Competitiveness in the service sector regulatory documents aimed at ensuring and improving. Bulletin news in NewScience Society International Scientific Journal. Vol 1 Issue 6, 2024, pages 276-279.