51
PHENOMENON OF DISCOURSE IN THE THEORY OF
INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION. DEFINITIONS
AND TYPOLOGIES OF DISCOURSE
Guzal ZOKHIDOVA
Student of International Journalism faculty, UzSWLU
Abstract
. This article is about the role of discourse in the theory of intercultural
communication. In our world phenomenon of discourse is the main aspect of
collaboration and its value in this field is precious. In short discourse analyses how,
what and why we say our speech. Very beginning of humanity started with discourse
which is not available in our life now. Discourse can be defined as a way of talking or
writing about a particular subject or issue, and it is
not just the words that are used
but also the underlying meanings and social implications of those words.
In this research, we will explore the different definitions and typologies of
discourse, and how they are relevant in the context of intercultural communication. We
will also examine the ways in which discourse is used to construct and maintain power
relations, as well as the ways in which it shapes our understanding of different cultures
and societies. Additionally, we will explore the different methods of discourse analysis
and the role it plays in understanding the complexities of intercultural communication,
speech.
Key words
:
discourse,
Intercultural
communication,
typologies,comprehension,
international
discourse,
multifaceted
concept,
communication.
The notion of discourse refers to the ways in which language, communication, and
social practices shape our understanding of the world. It encompasses a wide range of
topics, including language, power, knowledge, and identity.
Interpersonal discourse serves as the primary means by which communication is
typically realized in social interaction. Social action may make implicit or explicit
claims about the numerous related collectivisms that participants in a given
communicative event may belong to, some of which may be at odds with one another
9
.
One key aspect of discourse is the way in which language is used to convey meaning
and shape our understanding of the world. This includes not only the words we use, but
also the underlying grammar, semantics, and pragmatics that allow us to convey
meaning in different contexts. Discourse analysis, a method used to study discourse, is
a way to analyse the use of language in different contexts, such as in conversations,
texts, or media, to reveal hidden meanings and power relations. Another key aspect of
9
Cf.Scollon 2001
52
discourse is the way in which it is used to construct and maintain power relations.
Discourse can be used to reinforce or challenge existing power structures, such as those
based on race, class, gender, or nationality. For example, the use of certain language or
communication patterns can reinforce stereotypes and marginalize certain groups,
while other forms of discourse can challenge these power structures and promote social
change. Discourse is also closely tied to the production and dissemination of
knowledge. The way in which knowledge is constructed, presented, and received is
shaped by the discourse that surrounds it. For example, scientific discourse is different
from legal discourse, and the way in which knowledge is presented and received in
these fields is shaped by the discourse that surrounds them.
The notion of discourse is a complex and multifaceted concept that encompasses
a wide range of topics, including language, power, knowledge, and identity. It is a
crucial tool to understand how we communicate and how communication shapes our
understanding of the world. Discourse analysis is a way to study the use of language in
different contexts, revealing hidden meanings and power relations. The study of
discourse can provide insights into the way in which we talk and write about ourselves,
others, and the world around us, and how it shapes our understanding of who we are
and our place in the world.
Modes and types of discourse refer to the different ways in which language and
communication are used to convey meaning and shape our understanding of the world.
These modes and types can include spoken, written, visual, and nonverbal forms of
communication, each with their own unique characteristics and functions. Visual
discourse is another mode of discourse, which refers to the ways in which meaning is
conveyed through visual forms such as images, videos, and photographs. Visual
discourse can be studied through the analysis of visual semiotics, which is the study of
visual signs and symbols, and the ways in which they convey meaning. Nonverbal
discourse is another mode of discourse, which refers to the ways in which meaning is
conveyed through nonverbal forms such as facial expressions, div language, and
gestures. Nonverbal discourse can also include forms of communication such as
proxemics, which is the study of how people use space in communication.
Interpersonal discourse in the context of intercultural communication refers to the
53
ways in which individuals use language and communication to interact with each other
in cross-cultural settings. This can include verbal and nonverbal communication, as
well as the various cultural norms and expectations that shape these interactions.
One important aspect of interpersonal discourse in intercultural communication is
the role of language. In many cross-cultural interactions, individuals may not share a
common first language, leading to potential misunderstandings and communication
barriers. Additionally, language can also be used to construct and reinforce cultural
identities and power dynamics. For example, the use of a dominant language in a
multilingual setting can marginalize individuals who do not speak that language.
Another important aspect of interpersonal discourse in intercultural
communication is the role of nonverbal communication. Nonverbal cues, such as facial
expressions and div language, can convey meaning and convey cultural norms and
expectations. However, these cues can also be misinterpreted across cultural
boundaries, leading to misunderstandings and miscommunication.
The study of cultural differences in oral and written discourse is a crucial aspect
of intercultural communication. Oral discourse refers to spoken language and
communication, while written discourse refers to written language and communication.
Both forms of discourse can be used to convey meaning and shape our understanding
of the world, but they are also influenced by the cultural norms and expectations of the
society in which they are used.
One key cultural difference in oral discourse is the use of language. Different
cultures may have different languages, and even within a culture, different dialects or
registers may be used in different contexts. For example, in some cultures, it is common
to use formal language in business or academic settings, while in other cultures,
informal language may be more appropriate. Additionally, different cultures may have
different expectations for the use of direct or indirect language, and the use of certain
words or phrases may have different connotations across cultures.
Another key cultural difference in oral discourse is the use of nonverbal
communication. Nonverbal cues, such as facial expressions, gestures, and div
language, can convey meaning and convey cultural norms and expectations. However,
these cues can also be misinterpreted across cultural boundaries, leading to
54
misunderstandings and miscommunication. For example, in some cultures, direct eye
contact is seen as a sign of respect and attentiveness, while in other cultures, it may be
seen as impolite or aggressive.
In conclusion, the phenomenon of discourse in the theory of intercultural
communication is a complex and multifaceted concept that encompasses a wide range
of topics, including language, power, knowledge, and identity. It is a crucial tool to
understand how we communicate and how communication shapes our understanding
of the world. Discourse can take many forms, including spoken, written, and multi-
modal discourse, and serve many functions, including narrative, expository,
argumentative, and performative discourse.
Discourse can be studied at different levels, from the individual, to the group, to
the societal level, and can be classified by its mode, type, level of formality,
interactivity, and contextuality. Understanding the different definitions and typologies
of discourse is crucial in order to understand how it shapes our understanding of
different cultures and societies. Additionally, understanding the cultural differences in
oral and written discourse is also crucial for effective intercultural communication.
Studying discourse in the context of intercultural communication can provide
insights into the ways in which language, communication, and social practices shape
our understanding of the world, and how we can use this understanding to facilitate
effective communication across cultures. The importance of this topic lies in the fact
that our world is becoming more globalized and diverse, and effective communication
across cultures is becoming increasingly important for personal and professional
success.
References
1.
researchgate.net
2.
Cultural identities in international, interorganisational meetings: a corpus-
informed discourse analysis of indexical we Source: Informa UK Limited.
55
3.
Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts Source: Oxford
University Press (OUP).
4.
http://www.communicaid.com/cross-cultural-training/cultural- diversity.php
5.
An advanced resource book for students Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined
communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, London: Verso.
6.
Тешабаева, Дилфуза, and Гульбахор Абдухалилова. "ТУРИЗМ
СОҲАСИГА ОИД СЎЗ ВА ИБОРАЛАРНИ ПРЕФИКСЛАР ЁРДАМИДА
ЯСАЛИШИ." Ижтимоий-гуманитар
фанларнинг
долзарб
муаммолари/Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук/Actual
Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences. 3.9 (2023).
7.
Тешабаева, Дилфуза Муминовна. "Медиа Тилининг Шаклланиши:
Ахборот Узатиш Ва Қабул Қилиш Жараёнида Лисоний Коммуникация." Miasto
Przyszłości 34 (2023): 198-202.
8.
Тешабаева, Дилфуза Муминовна. "ҲАРБИЙЛАШГАН ТАЪЛИМ
КУРСАНТЛАРИГА ХОРИЖИЙ ТИЛЛАРНИ ЎҚИТИШДА КОММУНИКАТИВ
КОМПЕТЕНЦИЯНИ ШАКЛЛАНТИРИШДА АКТНИНГ ЎРНИ." Journal of
Universal Science Research 1.4 (2023): 235-242.
9.
Валиева, Наргизахон. "Военные образы в поэзии Александра
Файнберга." Science and Education 3.3 (2022): 610-613.
