Content from this work may be used under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence
. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
AGRITECH-III-2020
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 548 (2020) 022070
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022070
1
Some issues related to the study of brucellosis in Uzbekistan
A D Ulugmuradov and M A Uzimurodov
Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Samarkand, Uzbekistan
E-mail: nivi@vetgov.uz
Abstract
. This article provides some points on the fight against brucellosis in Uzbekistan as well
as independent research on epizootology, chronology, characterization of anti-brucellosis
vaccines and the properties of brucella strains with different species and virulence.
The research
results allow us to replenish the collection of standards of industrial crops of brucella that are
necessary for the development of domestic production of anti-brucellosis vaccines and
diagnosticums, as well as create national reference strains of brucella designed to control their
quality. Knowledge of the properties of epizootic strains of brucella circulating in a particular
territory allows us to classify farms and assess the degree of tension of epizootic and epidemic
processes, to establish the fact of migration of brucella from one animal species to another, to
identify pathways of pathogen distribution, and the choice of tactics for conducting antiepizootic
measures. The presented comparative characteristic of anti-brucellosis vaccines enables
specialists to choose the most effective and acceptable when carrying out measures for the
prevention and elimination of this disease.
1.
Introduction
The primary tasks that any government and state set are to increase the production of livestock products
since they are of great strategic importance related to food safety.
In turn, the safety of livestock products directly depends on the provision by the veterinary service
of the epizootic well-being of livestock for infectious diseases and, in particular, for brucellosis.
Brucellosis causing enormous damage to animal husbandry due to abortion, lack of offspring,
stillbirth, barrenness, reduced productivity of sick animals, increased costs of activities associated with
their recovery and prevention is of great economic importance.
In Uzbekistan, with the transition to a market economy, the introduction of livestock production has
fundamentally changed. At present, about 96% of cattle and 94% of small cattle in Uzbekistan are
located in the introduction of private farms and citizens. With the increase in the number of farms and
private farmsteads the danger of the spread of brucellosis has sharply increased.
Nowadays, horses, pigs and camels in the epizootology of brucellosis spread in the republic are not
significant due to their insignificant number and the lack of evidence of brucellosis among them.
However, recently the number of farms engaged in camel breeding, horse breeding and goat breeding
has been increasing.
Animal brucellosis is currently a global problem on a global scale, both for medicine and veterinary
medicine.
The complete elimination of brucellosis is almost impossible. What is necessary is the complete
destruction (disappearance) of the biological species of the pathogen, in this case brucella. Basically,
this is impossible since brucellosis has a species diversity, i.e. there are main pathogens of brucellosis
AGRITECH-III-2020
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 548 (2020) 022070
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022070
2
parasitizing on certain types of animals. So, on cattle- the species Br.abortus, on sheep and goats -
Br.melitensis, on pigs - Br.suis, etc.
Most species of brucella migrate from one animal species to another
and thereby complicate the epizootological situation. Therefore, even if we remove the source of the
pathogen and carry out all veterinary and sanitary measures in full, anyway, this regional territory will
have an unstable state.
In this regard, studying the pathogen epizootology, biotypic affiliation; improving the means,
methods of diagnosis and specific prophylaxis; searching for new highly effective ways to combat
brucellosis are urgent tasks of veterinary science and practice not only in Uzbekistan but also in other
countries.
2.
Independent research
Brief epizootology of brucellosis.
Animal brucellosis continues to be recorded with different intensities
in the USA, Germany, Holland, Denmark, France, China, Russia, South Korea and other developed
countries.
Brucellosis caused by Br.abortus is now officially considered eradicated in Canada, Australia, Japan
and Northern Europe.
In the USA and Northern European countries that have made significant progress in controlling
brucellosis for the past 50 years they used the strategy of compulsory vaccination of livestock in the
beginning and, gradually, as the incidence among animals decreased, instead of vaccination the policy
was “detection of brucellosis in animals and immediately slaughter” (test slaughter) which made it
possible to practically eradicate brucellosis among farm animals. An important role was played by the
state financial compensation to farmers and owners for the slaughtered animal.
The most endemic regions for brucellosis are the countries of the Mediterranean and the Middle East.
According to recent publications a high incidence of brucellosis and its growth is noted in China, in
almost all countries of South / Southeast Asia. In Central Asia the most endemic are Kyrgyzstan and
Azerbaijan.
In Uzbekistan, brucellosis is sporadically recorded everywhere. According to our data the average
prevalence in the republic is approximately: among cattle (cows) - 0.01% and among small cattle -
0.04% (These approximate figures have been preserved over the past 3 years).
This relative prosperity
for brucellosis can be maintained due to the fact that there is no concentration of a large number of
livestock in business and private farms, therefore sanitary cleaning in these categories of farms gives its
positive results. Farms with large livestock of 500, 1000 or more and that of often graze on seasonal
pastures remain problematic. In such categories of farms the problem of brucellosis is associated mainly
with cattle regrouping and untimely serodiagnosis.
Under these conditions the primary task facing veterinary specialists was to protect the health of the
population from brucellosis, i.e. its social significance has increased.
Therefore, the main methods for the control and prevention of brucellosis aimed at artificially
reducing the incidence of animals to a relatively low level when it occurs or spread within areas are
recording and registering, chipping and compensation
issues
for animal owners when removing
livestock.
Since these issues are one of the forms of solving the problem of brucellosis and other zoonotic
animal diseases in Uzbekistan they are considered at the government level.
The control of brucella species and biovars today in Uzbekistan also allows to classify foci, to carry
out their accounting and registration. This allows us to assess the degree of tension of epizootic and
epidemic processes, to establish the fact of migration of brucella from one animal species to another, to
identify the pathway of the pathogen, to choose the tactics for antiepizootic measures.
Currently, it is customary in the country to determine the degree of disadvantage of herds and farms
taking into account the level of distribution of brucellosis among animals:
•
limited - in case of disease within one year, up to 2% of the animals from the presence in the
herd (farm);
•
significant - with the disease, up to 10% of the animals from the presence in the herd (farm);
AGRITECH-III-2020
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 548 (2020) 022070
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022070
3
•
mass - with a disease of more than 10% of the animals from the presence in the herd (farm).
Based on this, control over the well-being of farms is carried out with the help of:
•
annual planned diagnosis of livestock, including young animals older than 2-3 months. (RBP,
KR, RA, IFA and, if necessary, RSK);
•
the presence of a veterinary certificate or certificate for new animals;
•
quarantine newly arrived animals, within 30 days period they must conduct a physical
examination and serological tests;
•
the issuance of each prosperous farm a special certificate.
2.1. Chronology of the fight against brucellosis in Uzbekistan:
•
1925-1952 - campaign for checking and slaughtering cattle, sheep and goats.
•
1953 - CDP vaccination campaign along with screening and slaughter.
•
1991 - privatization of livestock farms, the creation of small livestock farms and the expansion
of private farms. (Disruption of surveillance, increase in prevalence among animals).
•
1996 - change in the vaccination campaign of the cc: full dose for 3-6 month old calves,
revaccination of heifers with small doses of the vaccine from strain-19.
•
1998-2007 - for the first time, vaccination of sheep and goats with a vaccine from a strain - 19.
•
2007- application of Rev-1 vaccines for sheep and goats on selected farms.
This system of anti-brucellosis measures used in Uzbekistan with the use of vaccines in certain regions
of the country significantly improved the epizootic situation in brucellosis of cattle and small cattle.
Despite this, the search for new vaccines is ongoing and schemes for their use are being improved.
2.2.
Brief description of anti-brucellosis vaccines:
Currently recognized and widely used are vaccines from strains of Br.abortus 19 and Br.melitensis Rev-
1.
The vaccine from the strain Br.abortus 19, known since 1934 and is the most highly effective vaccine
among all anti-brucellosis vaccines in the world, it is harmless, sharply reduces the number of abortions
and positively reacting sick animals. The vaccine does not reduce milk yield, does not migrate from
vaccinated to unvaccinated animals. The vaccine prevents animals from naturally becoming infected,
although immunity may be insufficient in herds with the acute course of brucellosis.
Immunity tension is about 71.4–87.5% for 338 days. (Period of own observations). Revaccination
12 months later, including a small dose after immunization, enhances the immune state of the div by
12.5–29.6%.
The main disadvantage of the vaccine is that the blood serum of the vaccinated animals retains
agglutinins and complement-binding antibodies for a long time, which makes it impossible to
distinguish animals vaccinated with brucellosis and to give an objective assessment of the epizootic
situation in the country.
At the same time, when a small dose of the vaccine from strain 19 is revaccinated
the immunity of the same strength is created in cows and heifers as with a standard dose, it does not
interfere with the normal course of pregnancy and cause short-term seropositivity in vaccinated animals.
In Uzbekistan, this vaccine has been widely used for many years and its application schemes (including
a small dose) have been developed.
In 1953, American scientists Elberg and Herzberg selected a streptomycin-dependent mutant from a
virulent culture of strain Br.melitensis 6056. Then, on its basis, a reverse mutant was obtained, which
grew without streptomycin. The new variant they obtained was called Br.melitensis Rev-1.
A vaccine
made from this strain is the most immunogenic of all anti-brucellosis vaccines in the world. This vaccine
for immunization of sheep and goats is used by all countries of the world where there is brucellosis of
small cattle. A single vaccination of the rodents and goats with the vaccine from the strain Rev-1
AGRITECH-III-2020
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 548 (2020) 022070
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022070
4
provides intense and long-lasting immunity (observation period is 5 years), and therefore there is no
need to revaccinate adult animals (Ulasevich P.S. et al., 1974, 1975; Ivanov N M.M. et al., 1981, 1988;
Alton GG, 1987).
According to other researchers, in farms where a single vaccination was carried out
with a vaccine from the strain Rev-1, cases of brucellosis in animals were observed after 2.5 - 3 years.
Reimmunization of sheep with the vaccine from Rev-1 strain helps to preserve post-vaccination
antibodies for a long time, which makes it difficult to differentiate animals vaccinated and patients with
brucellosis (Sultonov A.A., Ivanov N.P. et al., Yagudin R.G. and other).
The disadvantage of this vaccine is its high residual virulence, agglutinogenicity and not rarely
abortogenicity. (own research).
Noteworthy is the vaccine from the strain Br.abortus 104M selected in 1950 by Soviet scientists from
a culture isolated from an aborted cow fetus.
The strain Br.abortus 104M is in a stable S-form, is weakly virulent, has pronounced antigenic and
higher immunogenic properties than strain 19. It is easy to control and differentiate from other strains
since it has only its own marker (does not produce H2S), non-abortogenous and does not migrate from
vaccinated animals to unvaccinated, less antigenic than strain 19.
The vaccine from strain 104M passed a wide test with a positive result in production conditions on
cattle and deer (Shumilov K.V., Klimanov A.I., Mikhailov N.A., Kalmykov V.V., Sklyarov O.D. and
other).
From the latest new means of specific prophylaxis is known the vaccine from the strain Br.abortus
RB51 obtained by Schurig and officially recognized in 1996 in the United States and in 2002 by the
European Union: an assessment by various authors interprets it differently, many indicate weak
immunogenicity and tension of the immune system.
In Uzbekistan, over the years, domestic vaccines have been developed from the strain Br.melitensis
Nevsky-12 (R-form) which was a derivative of the Nevsky-13 (RS-form) and Nevsky-14 (S-form)
vaccines (Abidzhanov M., Vafakulov A.Kh., Grinko V.K., Yaraev R.G. et al.). The most promising and
more studied is the vaccine from strain Nevsky-13. The disadvantage of this live vaccine along with the
lack of immunity is the quality control of its manufacture in connection with the variability of this strain
(instability).
The adjuvant vaccine from this strain turned out to be more preferable compared to live,
however, it had more pronounced reactogenic properties. (Shumilov K.V., Klimanov A.I., Grinko V.K.
et al.). The vaccine from Nevsky-14 strain has not been adequately studied although it has been fully
studied as a single brucellosis antigen for RA, RSK, RDSK, and the possibility of its use as a
diagnosticum has been established provided that its activity is standardized for the international
agglutinating serum anti-brucella abortus. (Shumilov K.V., Klimanov A.I., Ruzimurodov M.A.).
Thus, knowing the polytropy of the causative agent of brucellosis the multiplicity of factors for its
transmission from a healthy patient, the route of infection, etc., we conducted research on the basis of
the Research Institute of Virology (RIV) to restore the collection of standards for production strains of
brucella.
Based on the results of studying the archival materials of the brucella collection museum strains of
Br.abortus 104M, 19, B.B. melitensis Rev-1 as well as 10 epizootic strains of the abortus type were
selected (51, 92.114, 126, 207, 278, 337, 338, 604, 1 / 2017UZ) and melitensis (4, 30, 193, 9, 81, 653,
88, 84, 452, 95 UZ) to study their cultural morphological, biochemical, tinctorial, virulent and other
properties.
The main purpose of these studies was to establish the possibility of using individual strains
from the museum's collection as reference preparations and standards for the production of domestic
vaccines and diagnosticums.
The results of studies of the properties of 10 epizootic cultures of the abortus and melitensis species
in comparison with the reference strains of Br.abortus 544, Br. suis 1330, Br.melitensis Novocherkassk-
102 (All-Russian State Center for Quality and Standardization of Medicines for Animals and Feed)
showed that despite the length of reseeding and storage all strains retained good growth properties and
do not have pronounced persistent signs of dissociation.
So, in the sample with acriflafin (1: 1000), with R and S brucellosis sera (1:10), and the White-
Wilson method signs of dissociation were detected in the colonies of the primary generations; later, in
AGRITECH-III-2020
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 548 (2020) 022070
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022070
5
the 3-4 generation cultures these signs were absent. The results of the study in tests with penicillin (0.5;
5; 10; 50 U/ml) showed that all selected cultures of field strains are not sensitive to this antibiotic at its
concentration in MPPGA 50 U/ml.
Whereas the vaccine strain of Br. Abortus 19 was sensitive to a
concentration of 0.5 U/ml and the strains of Br. Abortus 104M and Br. Melitensis Rev-1 to a
concentration of 5 and 10 Units/ml. respectively. All cultures of reference strains (Br.abortus 544,
Br.melitensis Novocherkassk-102, and Br.wuis 1330) were also not sensitive to penicillin and grew well
when it was kept in MPPGA at a concentration of 50 U/ml.
On a medium with erythritol (1: 1000) all cultures of the studied field strains grew well in a sowing
dose of 100 microns. cells/ml. The reference strains of Br.abortus 544, Br. Melitensis Novocherkassk-
102, and Br.suis 1330 were also not sensitive to erythritol at a dose of 100 μl/ml i.e. observed their rapid
growth. Vaccine strains of Br.abortus 19, 104M and Br. (microbial cells), but single colonies were noted
when plating the strain Br. melitensis Rev-1 with a dose of 1 million microns. class This indicates its
higher virulence compared with cultures of the species Br. Abortus 19 and 104M.
Thus, despite the long-term storage of museum epizootic strains of brucella at MPHGGA (meat-
peptone hepatic glucose-glycerin agar) and the periodicity of their reseeding for over 65 years, they all
retained their main species and type cultural morphological, biochemical, virulent and other properties
and remain stable and epizootically significant.
The agglutinable properties of the prepared antigens from each strain separately were studied in the
classical agglutination reaction to the limit titer. It was found that the titers of detectable antibodies with
antigens from field strains were lower than the titers in the same sera with antigens from vaccine strains
of brucella. However, this difference in credits was not statistically significant.
The results of agglutinable, virulent and biochemical properties of epizootic strains of Br.abortus N
92, 126, 207, 1/2017 UZ and Br.melitensis N 4, 9, 633 allow them to be used as domestic reference
drugs instead of the commercial reference strain Br.abortus-544 (Weybridge).
Domestic standards for vaccine strains of the type Br.abortus 19 UZ, 104M UZ and Br.melitensis
Rev-1 UZ were selected from individual cell clones of museum vaccine cultures 19, 104M, Rev-1 and
passports in the established form were compiled and deposited in the "Unique Collection of Animal
Microorganisms of RIV (the Research Institute of Virology) ". Studies of the vaccine properties of these
strains are ongoing.
3.
Conclusion
In Uzbekistan, taking into account animal husbandry, the implementation of recreational activities
should be based on seromonitoring and vaccination. Based on the results of seromonitoring, establish
farms and territories where it is advisable to use vaccines from strains 19 and Rev-1. In cases of the
prevalence of brucellosis among cattle below 2%, apply the strategy of "identification and destruction"
that will be economically justified.
It has been established that despite the long-term storage of museum, epizootic strains of brucella at
MPHGGA and the periodicity of their reseeding for over 65 years, they all retained their main species
and type properties and remained stable and epizootically significant.
The results of a study of the agglutinable, virulent and biochemical properties of epizootic strains of
Br.abortus N 92, 126, 207, 1 / 2017UZ and Br.melitensis N 4, 9, 633 indicate the possibility of their use
as domestic reference drugs instead of a commercial reference strain of Br. abortus-544 (Weybridge).
Based. on the data obtained for the strains of Br.abortus 19 UZ biotype-1, Br.abortus 104M-variant
UZ biotype-6 and Br.melitensis Rev-1-variant UZ biotype-1, passports are drawn up in the established
form on the basis of which they included in the depository of the "Unique Collection of Animal
Microorganisms of RIV".
References
[1]
Zdradovsky P F 1963
Brucellosis
(Moscow: Medghiz) p 244
[2]
Vershilova P A
et al.
1974
Pathogenesis and immunology of brucellosis
(Moscow: Medicine)
p 30-6
AGRITECH-III-2020
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 548 (2020) 022070
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022070
6
[3]
Avilov V M, Seliverstov V V, Shumilov K V
et al
. 1997
J. Veterinary Medicine
7
3-6
[4]
Kosilov I A 1992
Brucellosis of farm animals (
Novosibirsk) p 260
[5]
Shumilov K V
et al.
2000
Sat. scientific VGNKI (
Moscow) p 160-3
[6]
Abidjanov M S 1963
Proceedings of the Institute UzNIVI
15
p 59-62
[7]
Ahmed W
et al.
2018
J
.
Microbial Pathogenesis
118
118-35
[8]
Alsaf M
et al
. 2018
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 8
393-403
[9]
Barton C and Lomme J 1980
J. Am. VETER.med.Ass.
12
1218-20
[10]
Martiyon I and Grillo M 2004
Vet. Research
.
35
1-28
[11]
Nicoletti P 2005
58
th
Brucellosis research Conference
(Mexico) p 1-5
[12]
World Health Organization annual report 2017
