The article examines the problem of centralization and decentralization of the budget. Budget decentralization is interconnected with the processes of geographical decentralization and decentralization of the system of administrative decision-making. Decentralization of the system of making and executing administrative decisions implies a wider delegation of authority to local divisions of the central executive authority. The article also states that the main goal of decentralization is to create a closer relationship between the control system and the population, and this requires strengthening the financial system of local governments. The task of decentralization is to provide the regions and local governments with certain powers in the field of taxation and expenditure of funds, as well as the ability to independently determine the parameters and structure of the budget expenditures. The article substantiates the advantages and disadvantages of budget centralization. Attempts were made to cover all arguments for and against decentralization.
The article studies the problem of centralization and decentralization of the budget. An attempt was made to cover all arguments for and against decentralization. A comparative analysis of the benefits of fiscal centralization and decentralization.
The increased attention to the problem of “centralization – decentralization” in the last decade has been caused by a serious practical interest, which is connected with the transition from unitary to federal government, and the vigorous development of relations of fiscal federalism.
The problem of financial resources and powers decentralization is attracted a lot of scientific researches, but none of them revealed the criterion for determining the optimal level of centralization or decentralization of budget funds in the revenue part of the local budget. To answer the question, what is better: fiscal centralization or decentralization, the theory of fiscal federalism is intended. Fiscal federalism is one of the main objects of research in the public sector of economy and reflects a complex pattern of relations between budgets of different levels.
This article is devoted to assessing the impact of the processes of decentralization of powers and responsibilities from the central government level to elected authorities at the subnational level, and also calculates the various degrees of accountability upwards and downwards, and various ranges of control from the central government.
This article deals with the problem of decentralization in the private sector. The advantages and disadvantages of decentralization are determined. With the decentralization of the private sector organization, the horizontal and vertical interaction of the levels of the organization's structure is of great importance. The study showed that segmenting income statements provide an opportunity to analyze the profitability of segments and measure the effectiveness of segment managers. Decentralized companies divide their business segments into specialized centers depending on the responsibility of segment managers.
The article is devoted to the process of reforming the system of the representative body of state power on the ground in Uzbekistan and to the problem of assessing the factors influencing the efficiency. Factors influencing the quality of activity of representative bodies of state power are classified.
The article considers the legal aspects of the activities of representative bodies of state power in the field, analyzes a number of objective and subjective indicators for assessing the effectiveness of this activity.
The development of modern approaches and the development of a model for the new Public Management of the economy is aimed at reducing the low efficiency of the bureaucratic management system, the state share in the economy, and improving the efficiency of the public management mechanism.
This article examines the concept of decentralization in the context of modernizing publicadministration system, various approaches to understanding this concept and the effective use of modern management methods in the process of democratization of public administration.
This article presents two analytical notes on sociological questionnaires on the topic of
a scientific grant concerning the problem of developing a decentralization mechanism as a factor in increasing the stability of the revenue base of local budgets and the social development of regions. The conclusions given in the data of the analytical note can be used in the development and implementation of budgetary policy.
The article is devoted to the process of reforming the system of the representative body of state power on the ground in Uzbekistan and to the problem of assessing the factors influencing the efficiency. Factors influencing the quality of activity of representative bodies of state power are classified.