STARS International University
157
Abstract:
Why do representatives of different cultures understand and perceive the
world so differently?
The most obvious differences are observed in European and Asian ethnic formations.
Oriental culture is mostly characterized by contemplation, while Western culture is iden-
tified by dynamics where culture should fill human life with new knowledge and beauty.
In fact, the differences between two societies are quite stark. One way or another, but
Western and Oriental culture enters into a certain conflict situation in contact with each
other. Then the differences between cultures are worthy to study thoroughly and draw a
line between the differences. Or maybe these are all false beliefs that are no longer valid
in modern society?
Key words:
selection matrix; the principle of variability; west; Orient; culture; the princi-
ple of integrity; cross-cultural learning.
Why do representatives of different cultures understand and perceive the world
so differently?
The most obvious differences are observed in European and Asian ethnic for-
mations. In 2003, Richard E. Nisbett (Professor at the University of Michigan) pub-
lished results on differences in perceptual functions between Western and Orien-
tal cultures.
At the heart of the Western worldview is culture of ancient Greece. And the
East is covered with esoteric incense of ancient China.
The participants of his experiment were students from the USA, China, Korea
and Japan. His assistant showed color scenes of underwater animal life. In each
film, there was one fish that moved much faster which was larger or brighter than
Abduganieva Mukaddas,
third year student of
Jizzakh branch of
National University
ofuzbekistan
named after Mirzo
Ulugbek
Nizamov Bekhruz,
third year student of
Jizzakh branch of National
University ofuzbekistan
named after Mirzo
Ulugbek
Alimov Normurat,
Docent of Psychology
Department of,
Jizzakh branch of
National University
ofuzbekistan named
after Mirzo Ulugbek
CULTURE
OF WESTERN
AND ORIENTAL
COUNTRIES
https://doi.org/10.47689/STARS.university-pp157-159
Global dunyoda ilm-fan va ta‘limdagi innovatsion
rivojlanishning zamonaviy trendlari 15 dekabr, 2022 yil.
158
the rest. And when the participants were asked to describe the scene they saw,
the Americans mentioned this particular fish based on natural law. The Japanese,
on the other hand, paid less attention to significant fish, stones at the bottom,
plants, and other less significant details. The differences were very sharp. Rep-
resentatives of Asian cultures paid attention to unimportant details and which
includes 70% more often than Americans.
At the second stage of experiment, the subjects were shown objects separately,
and not as part of the big picture.
Americans recognized them regardless of whether the subject was in the orig-
inal scene or not. The Japanese, on the other hand, did a better job of recogniz-
ing if they had previously seen an object in context with other objects. They did
not perceive, and remembered it better precisely in conjunction with the outside
world. This means that people living in the East perceive the world more holistical-
ly. It means that they view the world inseparably from context. At the same time,
representatives of Western traditions see the surrounding reality as the sum of
parts. In addition, there is another very solid conclusion. Contrary to the prevailing
ideas, the function of perceiving a picture of the world is not at all universal. And
the key to the formation of subjective reality is national culture.
In the middle-seventeenth century, the French philosopher Brilliance Pascal for-
mulated his famous theory that believing what the Christian church teaches is
more profitable than not believing. And in his reasoning, he used an approach that
in modern decision theory is called becoming a matrix in a win.
The bottom line is that a person has two options: to believe in God, or not to
believe. And the reality is that humanity does not know if he exists.
And here again two possibilities are realized:
If there is no God, then human life is finite. He final minus of religiosity in the
form of observance of thecommandments and self-restraint, and the bonuses of
freedom that unbelief provides with it -i, on the contrary, God exists, then the soul
of the righteous will be saved, and the soul of the sinner will be eternal damnation.
And it is clearer that in such a situation it is much more profitable to live with faith.
Pascal’s decision theory became the basis of all subsequent concepts.
At the same time, it is worth taking into account some important details that
people often forget in everyday life. It must be said that in fact, the differences be-
tween two societies are starting large. Even if you look at the perception of death
between the Western and Eastern worlds.
In the East, death and burial is a rites. First of all, this is a theatrical act, where
each relative must show respect to the deceased, where women must cry, throw
themselves on the coffin, tear their hair and shout “who did you leave us for?”,
Even if she is a widow and she is not sad, she should still do it. And in the west, on
the contrary, a funeral is an event where you definitely need to save your face. Ev-
eryone should mourn quietly, and most importantly, with dignity. Crying, scream-
ing and hysteria at a funeral means losing your face. Therefore, Western funerals
are always sad, in black and tasteful.
Although, a rather fashionable trend has recently appeared in science, a new
view, according to which the conflict situation of the two West-Eastern cultures
is highly exaggerated. And lately culturologists have been proving that a dialogue
between these two cultures is not only possible, but also necessary and even use-
STARS International University
159
ful. And in fact, these are only external differences. And if you look inside each
person, then in fact everyone is the same and everyone wants the same thing.
CONCLUSION
Thus, cross-cultural perception is unlikely, and unlikely to be due to genetics.
After all, culture, in fact, should fill human life with new knowledge and beauty.
And depending on the change of place of residence, it is possible for a person to
change his culture.
REFERENCES
1. “Philosophy of Culture” – Alexander Dobrokhotov, 2021, LitRes publishing
house.
2. Burkhanovna, Khaidarova Dilfuza, Makhmudov Rashid Alisherovich, and Ni-
zomov Behruz Umar Ugli. “Communication as the main source of personality de-
velopment”. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 11.
5 (2021): 75–80.
3. “Philosophy of culture. Textbook for universities” – Vasily Pivoev, 2009, Aca-
demic Project Publishing House.
4. “Philosophy and culture”. – Ilyenkov Evald Vasilyevich, 2012, Moscow publish-
ing house.
5. “Culturology: Textbook”. – T. Yu. Bystrova, 2014, publishing house of the Ural
University.
6. Murotmusayev, Komiljon, and Bexruz Nizomov. “Internet tarmog‘ida yolg‘izlik
va psixik jarayonlar”. Zamonaviy innovatsion tadqiqotlarning dolzarb muammolari
va rivojlanish tendensiyalari: yechimlar va istiqbollar 1. 1 (2022): 457–460.
7. Nosirovich A. N., & Umarovich N. B. (2022). Cyberspace in the real world.
Journal of Academic Research and Trends in Educational Sciences, 1(10),
410–414.
