Artificial intelligence-assisted cephalometric analysis versus manual tracing in distal occlusion treatment: a comparative clinical study using webceph and cephx platforms

Abstract

Traditional manual cephalometric analysis remains the gold standard in orthodontic diagnosis despite being time-consuming and operator-dependent.. Artificial intelligence (Al) platforms offer automated solutions that may enhance accuracy and efficiency in orthodontic treatment planning. Objective: To compare the accuracy, reliability and clinical efficiency of Al-assisted cephalometric analysis using WebCeph and CephX platforms versus conventional manual tracing methods in patients with distal occlusion (Class II malocclusion).

Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2020
inLibrary
Google Scholar
CC BY f
249-249

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Nigmatov, R., & Ruziev, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted cephalometric analysis versus manual tracing in distal occlusion treatment: a comparative clinical study using webceph and cephx platforms . in Library, 1(2), 249–249. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/archive/article/view/130019
Rakhmatulla Nigmatov, Tashkent State Dental Institute

Department of Orthodontics and Dental Prosthetics. Professor. Head of the department.

Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

Traditional manual cephalometric analysis remains the gold standard in orthodontic diagnosis despite being time-consuming and operator-dependent.. Artificial intelligence (Al) platforms offer automated solutions that may enhance accuracy and efficiency in orthodontic treatment planning. Objective: To compare the accuracy, reliability and clinical efficiency of Al-assisted cephalometric analysis using WebCeph and CephX platforms versus conventional manual tracing methods in patients with distal occlusion (Class II malocclusion).


background image

The International Congress on Health Studies

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ASSISTED CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS VERSUS
MANUAL TRACING IN DISTAL OCCLUSION TREATMENT: A COMPARATIVE

CLINICAL STUDY USING WEBCEPH AND CEPHX PLATFORMS

Sherzodbek Ruziev (Kokand University Andijan Branch); Nigmatov Rakhmatulla (Tashkent State
Dental Institute); Nigmatova Iroda (Tashkent State Dental Institute)

Background: Traditional manual cephalometric analysis remains the gold standard in orthodontic
diagnosis despite being time-consuming and operator-dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms
offer automated solutions that may enhance accuracy and efficiency in orthodontic treatment
planning.

Objective: To compare the accuracy, reliability, and clinical efficiency of AI-assisted cephalometric
analysis using WebCeph and CephX platforms versus conventional manual tracing methods in patients
with

distal

occlusion

(Class

II

malocclusion).

Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted with 20 patients (mean age 14.2 ± 2.3 years)
diagnosed with Class II malocclusion. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed using three
methods: manual tracing, WebCeph automated analysis, and CephX automated analysis. Seventeen
cephalometric parameters were measured, including angular (SNA, SNB, ANB, GoGn-SN, U1-SN, L1-
MP) and linear measurements. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests, intraclass correlation
coefficients

(ICC),

and

Bland-Altman

plots.

Results: AI-assisted platforms demonstrated high correlation with manual measurements (ICC > 0.85
for most parameters). WebCeph showed superior performance in angular measurements (mean
difference < 1.2°), while CephX excelled in linear measurements (mean difference < 0.8mm). Analysis
time was significantly reduced: manual (45.2 ± 8.1 minutes), WebCeph (3.4 ± 0.6 minutes), CephX (2.8
± 0.5 minutes). Both AI platforms showed excellent intra-examiner reliability (ICC > 0.90).

Conclusions: AI-assisted cephalometric analysis platforms provide clinically acceptable accuracy with
significant time savings compared to manual methods. These technologies can enhance orthodontic
workflow efficiency while maintaining diagnostic precision in distal occlusion treatment planning.

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Cephalometrics, Orthodontics, Class Ii Malocclusion, Digital Diagnosis,

Webceph, Cephx