Exploring lexical units related to energetics

inLibrary
Google Scholar
Журнал:
Выпуск:
Отрасль знаний
f
54-56
0

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Поделиться
Низомова, З., & Ахмедов, О. (2024). Exploring lexical units related to energetics. in Library, 1(1), 54–56. извлечено от https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/archive/article/view/54113
Зебо Низомова, Джизакский Государственный Педагогический Университет
Аспирант
Ойбек Ахмедов, Узбекский государственный университет мировых языков
Научный руководитель, д.б.н.
0
Цитаты
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Аннотация

This article provides a detailed examination of the lexical units related to energetics, focusing on the vocabulary used to describe energy, power, and related concepts. Through a comprehensive analysis of key terms, semantic fields, this study offers insights into the rich and diverse vocabulary associated with the field of energetics.


background image

54

4. Smith, A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. W. Strahan

and T. Cadell. 1994. p. 73.

5. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/

EXPLORING LEXICAL UNITS RELATED TO ENERGETICS

Nizomova Zebo,

Postgraduate student

Jizzakh state pedagogical university

Scientific supervisor,

Ahmedov Oybek

DSc, USWLU

Abstract.

This article provides a detailed examination of the lexical units related to

energetics, focusing on the vocabulary used to describe energy, power, and related concepts.
Through a comprehensive analysis of key terms, semantic fields, this study offers insights into
the rich and diverse vocabulary associated with the field of energetics.

Keywords:

Energetics, energy, power, vocabulary, lexical units, semantic fields, linguistic

analysis.

Introduction.

Energetics, as a multidisciplinary field encompassing physics, chemistry,

engineering, and environmental science, relies on a diverse array of lexical units to describe
and discuss energy-related phenomena. This article aims to explore the lexical richness of the
vocabulary associated with energetics, examining key terms, semantic fields, and linguistic
features that characterize this specialized domain. This study aims to explore the origin and
evolution of words related to energetics in English, examining key terms, semantic nuances,
and conceptual frameworks that characterize this specialized domain. By tracing the historical
roots and semantic development of these words, we gain insights into the dynamic interplay
between language, culture, and scientific thought.

The exploration of the origin and evolution of words related to energetics in English offers

a unique perspective on the historical development of scientific language and conceptual
frameworks

7

. By examining the linguistic, historical, and scientific dimensions of these terms,

we gain a deeper understanding of the rich and diverse vocabulary that underpins the study of
energy and its transformations.

The origin and evolution of words related to energetics in English reflect the historical

development of scientific thought, technological innovation, and linguistic adaptation. These
terms have undergone semantic shifts and conceptual refinements over time, mirroring the
advancement of human understanding in the study of energy and its transformations

8

.

The analysis begins by identifying core concepts and key terms central to the field of

energetics, including “energy,” “power,” “work,” “heat,” “kinetic energy,” “potential energy,”
and “entropy.” These terms serve as foundational elements in discussions about energy
transformation, conservation, and utilization.

7

Seborg, D. E., Edgar, T. F., Mellichamp, D. A., & Doyle III, F. J. Process dynamics and control. John Wiley &

Sons. 2010. p. 39.

8

Çengel, Y. A., & Boles, M. A. Thermodynamics: An engineering approach. McGraw-Hill Education. 2014. p.

79


background image

55

The origin and evolution of words related to energetics in English reflect the historical

development of scientific understanding, technological advancements, and linguistic borrowing
from various languages. Below is a detailed overview of the origin and evolution of key terms
in energetics:

1. Energy:

- Origin: The term “energy” derives from the Greek word “energeia,” meaning activity or

operation, which was introduced by Aristotle in his works on metaphysics and natural
philosophy.

- Evolution: The modern usage of “energy” emerged in the 17th and 18th centuries with

the rise of natural philosophy and the scientific revolution. The concept of energy evolved
through the works of scientists such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who introduced the idea of
vis viva (living force), and James Prescott Joule, who formulated the principle of conservation
of energy.

2. Power:

- Origin: The term “power” has its roots in the Latin word “potere,” meaning to be able or

have authority, which was later adapted into Old French as “povoir” and Middle English as
“pouer.”

- Evolution: In the context of energetics, “power” evolved to denote the rate at which

energy is transferred or converted, as quantified by the amount of work done per unit time. The
concept of power became central to the study of mechanical, electrical, and thermal systems,
leading to the development of various power units such as horsepower and watt.

3. Work:

- Origin: The term “work” originates from the Old English word “weorc,” which referred

to physical or mental activity, effort, or labor.

- Evolution: In the realm of energetics, “work” came to represent the transfer of energy

from one system to another through the application of force over a distance. The concept of
work underwent refinement and formalization in the fields of mechanics and thermodynamics,
becoming a fundamental quantity in the study of energy conversion and conservation.

4. Heat:

- Origin: The term “heat” traces its origins to the Old English word “hǣtu,” which referred

to the sensation of warmth or the quality of being hot.

- Evolution: In the context of energetics, “heat” evolved to signify the transfer of thermal

energy between systems due to temperature differences. The study of heat and its effects on
matter led to the development of thermodynamics as a distinct branch of science, with concepts
such as heat capacity, latent heat, and heat transfer playing central roles.

5. Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy:

- Origin: The terms “kinetic” and “potential” derive from the Greek words “kinētikos”

(meaning motion) and “potential” (meaning power), respectively.

- Evolution: In the context of energetics, “kinetic energy” and “potential energy” emerged

as fundamental concepts in the study of mechanical systems and gravitational fields. The
distinction between kinetic energy (energy of motion) and potential energy (energy of position)
laid the groundwork for understanding energy transformation and conservation principles

9

.

6. Entropy:

9

Sandler, S. I. Chemical and engineering thermodynamics. John Wiley & Sons. 2010. p.163.


background image

56

- Origin: The term “entropy” was coined by Rudolf Clausius in the mid-19th century,

combining the Greek words “en” (in) and “trope” (transformation).

- Evolution: In the field of thermodynamics, “entropy” became a key concept representing

the measure of disorder or randomness in a system. The concept of entropy, along with the
second law of thermodynamics, introduced the notion of irreversibility and the directionality of
energy flow in natural processes

10

.

Energetics encompasses a wide range of thematic clusters and semantic fields, each

characterized by a distinct set of lexical units. These semantic fields may include
thermodynamics, electromagnetism, fluid dynamics, and renewable energy sources. By
examining the semantic relationships between lexical units within these fields, researchers gain
insights into the interconnectedness of energy-related concepts

11

.

There are several specialized terminology and technical jargon related to energetics which

are the objects of our study as well. Energetics employs specialized terminology and technical
jargon to describe complex phenomena and mathematical relationships. Terms such as
“efficiency,” “enthalpy,” “entropy,” “exergy,” and “calorimetry” are examples of technical
vocabulary used to quantify and measure energy properties and processes.

Conclusion.

The lexical units related to energetics represent a rich and diverse vocabulary

that reflects the complexity and interdisciplinary nature of the field. By examining core
concepts, semantic fields, specialized terminology, and linguistic features, researchers gain a
deeper understanding of the language used to describe energy-related phenomena. This analysis
underscores the importance of linguistic precision and clarity in scientific discourse, facilitating
effective communication and knowledge dissemination within the field of energetics.

In conclusion, the semantic analysis of lexical units related to energetics in English has

provided valuable insights into the historical, conceptual, and linguistic dimensions of energy-
related language. By unraveling the semantic intricacies and linguistic trajectories of key terms,
this study contributes to our understanding of the dynamic interplay between language and
science, enriching our appreciation for the complexities of energetics as a multidisciplinary
field.

Through rigorous analysis and interpretation, this study has shed light on the semantic

nuances and conceptual frameworks that underpin the vocabulary of energetics in English,
paving the way for further research, exploration, and interdisciplinary dialogue in this
fascinating domain.

REFERENCES

1. Çengel, Y. A., & Boles, M. A. Thermodynamics: An engineering approach. McGraw-

Hill Education. 2014. p. 79.

2. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. The Feynman lectures on physics (Vol.

1). Basic books. 2010. p. 128.

3. Sandler, S. I. Chemical and engineering thermodynamics. John Wiley & Sons. 2010.

p.163.

4. Seborg, D. E., Edgar, T. F., Mellichamp, D. A., & Doyle III, F. J. Process dynamics and

control. John Wiley & Sons. 2010. p. 39.

10

Van Wylen, G. J., Sonntag, R. E., Borgnakke, C., & Sonntag, B. Fundamentals of thermodynamics. John Wiley

& Sons. 2013. p. 48.

11

Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. The Feynman lectures on physics (Vol. 1). Basic books. 2010. p.

128.

Библиографические ссылки

£engel, Y. A., & Boles, M. A. Thermodynamics: An engineering approach. McGraw-Hill Education. 2014. p. 79.

Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B„ & Sands, M. The Feynman lectures on physics (Vol. 1). Basic books. 2010. p. 128.

Sandler, S. I. Chemical and engineering thermodynamics. John Wiley & Sons. 2010. p. 163.

Seborg, D. E., Edgar, T. F., Mellichamp, D. A., & Doyle III, F. J. Process dynamics and control. John Wiley & Sons. 2010. p. 39.